Background noise model of spaceborne photon-counting lidars over oceans and aerosol optical depth retrieval from ICESat-2 noise data

被引:4
|
作者
Yang, Jian [1 ]
Zheng, Huiying [2 ]
Ma, Yue [1 ]
Zhao, Pufan [1 ]
Zhou, Hui [1 ,3 ]
Li, Song [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Xiao Hua [4 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Elect Informat, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Geodesy & Geomat, Qingdao 266590, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Inst Quantum Technol, Wuhan 430206, Peoples R China
[4] Univ New South Wales, Sch Sci, Canberra, BC 2610, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Photon-counting lidar; Background noise; Noise model; Ocean surface; Aerosol optical depth; ICESat-2; ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTION ALGORITHM; SOLAR SPECTRAL MODEL; SURFACE; LAND; SCATTERING; MODIS; THICKNESS; CLOUD; REFLECTANCE; IRRADIANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2023.113858
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The ICESat-2 (Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2) photon-counting lidar is a revolutionary active remote sensing device and is extremely sensitive to both laser signal and solar background induced noise photons. The weak laser signals, such as aerosol and water subsurface backscattered laser photons, may be buried in noise in the daytime. A noise model for spaceborne photon-counting lidars is of vital importance in understanding and evaluating the performance of a lidar system, as well as in data processing and applications. From the reciprocity perspective, the main noise source for photon-counting lidars is solar background radiation, which in turn is the signal source of ocean color sensors. In the absence of clouds, it is possible to estimate the aerosol information using background noise data of ICESat-2 if the background noise is accurately modeled. In this study, a background noise model of photon-counting lidars over oceans is proposed that carefully considers the contributions of gas molecules, aerosol, water surface, subsurface, and detector dark noise. As the background rate from clouds are much larger than the sum of other factors, in this study, we only consider the cloudless atmosphere by using a cloud screening process. By inputting the system and environmental parameters, the theoretical predictions of noise level in six study areas have an average MAPE of similar to 5% compared with ICESat-2 measured noise data. The results also indicate that without clouds, the variation of aerosols dominates the variation of ICESat-2 total background noise in open ocean areas. Then, based on this noise model, a method to estimate aerosol optical depths (AODs) over oceans is proposed solely on the ICESat-2 product including background noise rate and environmental data. Validation against MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) daily AODs indicates that the average MAPE is <20% and the average correlation coefficient is 0.95 in six study areas. This method may provide a new AOD retrieval way over oceans in the daytime, when it is difficult to directly calculate AODs using lidar backscattered signal under strong background noise. In addition, the background noise of the ICESat-2 photon-counting lidar in its six channels (or pixels) has the potential to be regarded as the signal of an "ocean color camera" with only a single narrow green band. Based on this consideration, future works may be conducted to combine ocean color remote sensing with ICESat-2 photon-counting lidar.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Instrument Radiometric Correction of Laser Signals and Background Noise for ICESat-2 Photon-Counting Lidar
    Yang, Jian
    Zheng, Huiying
    Ma, Yue
    Liu, Xinyuan
    Li, Song
    [J]. IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2024, 21
  • [2] Derived Reflectance Over Open Oceans Using ICESat-2 Background Noise and Auxiliary Data
    Zheng, Huiying
    Yang, Jian
    Ma, Yue
    Ma, Yi
    Zhou, Hui
    Wang, Xiao Hua
    Li, Song
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 61
  • [3] A noise removal algorithm based on adaptive elevation difference thresholding for ICESat-2 photon-counting data
    Wang, Bikang
    Ma, Yi
    Zhang, Jingyu
    Zhang, Huanwei
    Zhu, Haitian
    Leng, Zihao
    Zhang, Xuechun
    Cui, Aijun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2023, 117
  • [4] A main direction-based noise removal algorithm for ICESat-2 photon-counting LiDAR data
    Pan, Jiya
    Gao, Fan
    Wang, Jinliang
    Zhang, Jianpeng
    Liu, Qianwei
    Deng, Yuncheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2024, 98 (09)
  • [5] A Density-Based Multilevel Terrain-Adaptive Noise Removal Method for ICESat-2 Photon-Counting Data
    Wang, Longyu
    Zhang, Xuqing
    Zhang, Ying
    Chen, Feng
    Dang, Songya
    Sun, Tao
    [J]. SENSORS, 2023, 23 (24)
  • [6] A Robust Density Estimation Method for Glacier-Height Retrieval From ICESat-2 Photon-Counting Data
    Chang, Ruijie
    Huang, Ronggang
    Jiang, Liming
    Dong, Zhen
    Wang, Hansheng
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 61
  • [7] A New Model for Elevation Change Estimation in Antarctica From Photon-Counting ICESat-2 Altimetric Data
    Li, Rongxing
    He, Youquan
    Li, Hongwei
    Gu, Yuanyuan
    Li, Guojun
    Qiao, Gang
    Xie, Huan
    Hao, Tong
    Cui, Xiangbin
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 62
  • [8] A Multi-Level Auto-Adaptive Noise-Filtering Algorithm for Land ICESat-2 Photon-Counting Data
    Liu, Jun
    Liu, Jingyun
    Xie, Huan
    Ye, Dan
    Li, Peinan
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (21)
  • [9] Applicability of an automatic surface detection approach to micropulse photon-counting lidar altimetry data: implications for canopy height retrieval from future ICESat-2 data
    Moussavi, Mahsa S.
    Abdalati, Waleed
    Scambos, Ted
    Neuenschwander, Amy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 35 (13) : 5263 - 5279
  • [10] Retrieval of Aerosol Optical Depth Over Land at 0.490 μm from Oceansat-2 Data
    A. K. Mishra
    Tirthankar Banerjee
    Yogesh Kant
    D. S. Shaik
    A. K. Singh
    [J]. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2018, 46 : 761 - 769