Scenario-Based Decision Analysis: Integrated scenario planning and structured decision making for resource management under climate change

被引:5
|
作者
Miller, Brian W. [1 ,6 ]
Eaton, Mitchell J. [2 ,3 ]
Symstad, Amy J. [4 ]
Schuurman, Gregor W. [5 ]
Rangwala, Imtiaz [6 ,7 ]
Travis, William R. [8 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, North Cent Climate Adaptat Sci Ctr, Boulder, CO USA
[2] North Carolina State Univ, Southeast Climate Adaptat Sci Ctr, US Geol Survey, Raleigh, NC USA
[3] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Appl Ecol, Raleigh, NC USA
[4] US Geol Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Res Ctr, Hot Springs, SD USA
[5] Natl Pk Serv, Climate Change Response Program, Ft Collins, CO USA
[6] Univ Colorado, North Cent Climate Adaptat Sci Ctr, UCB 611, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
[7] Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO USA
[8] Univ Colorado, Dept Geog, Boulder, CO USA
关键词
Adaptation; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Risk; Scenarios; Surprises; Uncertainty; ADAPTATION; CONSERVATION; UNCERTAINTY; FUTURE; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110275
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Managing resources under climate change is a high-stakes and daunting task, especially because climate change and associated complex biophysical responses engender sustained directional changes as well as abrupt transformations. This environmental non-stationarity challenges assumptions and expectations among scientists, managers, rights holders, and stakeholders. These challenges are anything but straightforward - a high degree of uncertainty impedes our ability to predict the environmental trajectory with confidence, and affected resources often span multiple governance jurisdictions or are subject to competing management objectives. Fortunately, tools exist to help grapple with such challenges. Two commonly used tools are scenario planning (SP) and structured decision making (SDM). SP is a well-established approach for assessing system response and facilitating decision making under a wide range of conditions that are uncertain and uncontrollable, such as those associated with adapting to climate change. However, SP lacks a defined structure for establishing objectives, quantifying tradeoffs, and evaluating the performance of candidate decisions to meet those objectives. SDM, on the other hand, is rooted in decision theory and focuses on explicit (often quantitative) assessment of the expected outcomes of choosing among a set of decision alternatives. SDM has been criticized for an inability to account for surprises and for imposing an overly narrow framing of problems to increase tractability. We discuss the strengths and limitations of SDM and SP as experienced through their application in various resource-management contexts, and then propose a new generalized framework - Scenario-Based Decision Analysis (SBDA) - that integrates these complementary approaches. SBDA structures resource management problems and solutions while considering uncertainties and surprises to inform resource management decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scenario-based evaluation of integrated urban water management framework: a decision making approach
    Maurya, Satya Prakash
    Ohri, Anurag
    Singh, Prabhat Kumar
    Singh, Ramesh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 22 (04) : 393 - 408
  • [2] Climate change scenario planning: A model for the integration of science and management in environmental decision-making
    Cobb, Ashley Noel
    Thompson, Jessica Leigh
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2012, 38 : 296 - 305
  • [3] Integration of Decision Analysis and Scenario Planning for Coastal Engineering and Climate Change
    Karvetski, Christopher W.
    Lambert, James H.
    Keisler, Jeffrey M.
    Linkov, Igor
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2011, 41 (01): : 63 - 73
  • [4] Distributed Scenario-Based Optimization for Asset Management in a Hierarchical Decision Making Environment
    Dalal, Gal
    Gilboa, Elad
    Mannor, Shie
    [J]. 2016 POWER SYSTEMS COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (PSCC), 2016,
  • [5] Scenario-based decision making for architectural variability in product families
    America, P
    Hamme, D
    Ionita, MT
    Obbink, H
    Rommes, E
    [J]. SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINES, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3154 : 284 - 303
  • [6] Fast Scenario-based Decision Making in Unbalanced Distribution Networks
    Bolognani, Saverio
    Dorfler, Florian
    [J]. 2016 POWER SYSTEMS COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (PSCC), 2016,
  • [7] A SCENARIO-BASED FRAMEWORK FOR MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS IN WATER-RESOURCES PLANNING
    STEWART, TJ
    SCOTT, L
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1995, 31 (11) : 2835 - 2843
  • [8] Improving decision-making with scenario planning
    Chermack, TJ
    [J]. FUTURES, 2004, 36 (03) : 295 - 309
  • [9] Using Simple, Decision-Centered, Scenario-Based Planning to Improve Local Coastal Management
    Norton, Richard K.
    Buckman, Stephen
    Meadows, Guy A.
    Rable, Zachary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2019, 85 (04) : 405 - 423
  • [10] Territorialities and Urbanities Transform: A Scenario-Based Approach to Local Planning and Decision Making in Inukjuak and Salluit, Nunavik
    Vachon, Genevieve
    Avarello, Mathieu
    Landry, Julien
    St-Jean, Laurence
    [J]. ETUDES INUIT STUDIES, 2020, 44 (1-2): : 207 - 236