Benefits of Intelligent Fuzzy Controllers in Comparison to Classical Methods for Adaptive Optics

被引:2
|
作者
Costa, Victor [1 ]
Beccaro, Wesley [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Polytech Sch, Dept Elect Syst Engn, BR-05508010 Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
瑞典研究理事会; 巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
adaptive optics; intelligent controllers; instrumentation; simulation; wavefront sensors; point-spread functions;
D O I
10.3390/photonics10090988
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Adaptive Optics (AO) systems have been developed throughout recent decades as a strategy to compensate for the effects of atmospheric turbulence, primarily caused by poor astronomical seeing. These systems reduce the wavefront distortions using deformable mirrors. Several AO simulation tools have been developed, such as the Object-Oriented, MATLAB, and Adaptive Optics Toolbox (OOMAO), to assist in the project of AO. However, the main AO simulators focus on AO models, not prioritizing the different control techniques. Moreover, the commonly applied control strategies in ground-based telescopes are based on Integral (I) or Proportional-Integral (PI) controllers. This work proposes the integration of OOMAO models to Simulink to support the development of advanced controllers and compares traditional controllers with intelligent systems based on fuzzy logic. The controllers were compared in three scenarios of different turbulence and atmosphere conditions. The simulations were performed using the characteristics/parameters of the Southern Astrophysical Research (SOAR) telescope and assessed with the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM), Half Light Radius (HLR), and Strehl ratio metrics to compare the performance of the controllers. The results demonstrate that adaptive optics can be satisfactorily simulated in OOMAO adapted to Simulink and thus further increase the number of control strategies available to OOMAO. The comparative results between the MATLAB script and the Simulink blocks designed showed a maximum relative error of 3% in the Strehl ratio and 1.59% in the FWHM measurement. In the assessment of the control algorithms, the fuzzy PI controller reported a 25% increase in the FWHM metrics in the critical scenario when compared with open-loop metrics. Furthermore, the fuzzy PI controller outperformed the results when compared with the I and PI controllers. The findings underscore the constraints of conventional control methods, whereas the implementation of fuzzy-based controllers showcases the promise of intelligent approaches in enhancing control performance under challenging atmospheric conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of vibration mitigation controllers for adaptive optics systems
    Guesalaga, Andres
    Neichel, Benoit
    Rigaut, Francois
    Osborn, James
    Guzman, Dani
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2012, 51 (19) : 4520 - 4535
  • [2] Robust Adaptive Fuzzy logic controllers for Intelligent Universal Transformers in ADA
    Sadeghi, Maryam
    Gholami, Majid
    MEMS, NANO AND SMART SYSTEMS, PTS 1-6, 2012, 403-408 : 5038 - 5044
  • [3] A Comparison of Tuning Methods for PID-Controllers with Fuzzy and Neural Network Controllers
    Gross, Clemens
    Voelker, Hendrik
    CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS AND CONTROL, 2020, 95 : 74 - 86
  • [4] COMPARISON OF CLASSICAL AND FUZZY EDGE DETECTION METHODS
    Ozdemir, Gulcihan
    KONYA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2024, 12 (01):
  • [5] ADAPTIVE CONTROLLERS FOR INTELLIGENT MONITORING
    BELLAZZI, R
    SIVIERO, C
    STEFANELLI, M
    DENICOLAO, G
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 7 (06) : 515 - 540
  • [6] Intelligent Control Systems and Fuzzy Controllers. II. Trained Fuzzy Controllers, Fuzzy PID Controllers
    S. N. Vassilyev
    Yu. I. Kudinov
    F. F. Pashchenko
    I. S. Durgaryan
    A. Yu. Kelina
    I. Yu. Kudinov
    A. F. Pashchenko
    Automation and Remote Control, 2020, 81 : 922 - 934
  • [7] Intelligent Control Systems and Fuzzy Controllers. II. Trained Fuzzy Controllers, Fuzzy PID Controllers
    Vassilyev, S. N.
    Kudinov, Yu. I.
    Pashchenko, F. F.
    Durgaryan, I. S.
    Kelina, A. Yu.
    Kudinov, I. Yu.
    Pashchenko, A. F.
    AUTOMATION AND REMOTE CONTROL, 2020, 81 (05) : 922 - 934
  • [8] COMPARISON OF ADAPTIVE CONTROLLERS
    JACOBS, OLR
    SARATCHANDRAN, P
    AUTOMATICA, 1980, 16 (01) : 89 - 97
  • [9] Methods to Design Fuzzy Controllers
    Volosencu, Constantin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, MODELLING AND SIMULATION: CONTROLLING, MODELLING AND SIMULATION, 2009, : 378 - +
  • [10] An Intelligent Fuzzy-GPC Control for Agricultural Sprayers: Comparison Between GPC and PID Fuzzy Controllers
    Schutz, Deniver Reinke
    Mercaldi, Heitor, V
    Penaloza, Elmer A. G.
    Oliveira, Vilma A.
    Cruvinel, Paulo E.
    CONTROLO 2022, 2022, 930 : 272 - 284