A comparison of different metaheuristic optimization algorithms on hydrogen storage-based microgrid sizing

被引:3
|
作者
Long Phan-Van [1 ]
Takano, Hirotaka [2 ]
Tuyen Nguyen Duc [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hanoi Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Hanoi, Vietnam
[2] Gifu Univ, Dept Elect Elect & Comp Engn, Gifu, Japan
[3] Shibaura Inst Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Tokyo, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Hydrogen storage system; Hybrid renewable energy system; Microgrid; Metaheuristic algorithm; System optimizing; SYSTEM; PV;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2023.05.152
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Microgrids (MGs) with a high penetration of renewable energy are becoming increasingly popular, mainly due to the need for a sustainable and environmentally friendly power system. However, the stochastic characteristic of renewable energy sources makes it a considerable challenge when designing a microgrid. Appropriate installation of energy storage systems (ESSs) such as battery and hydrogen storage systems are needed to counter the intermittent nature of energy sources. This study presents a comparison and evaluation of eight different metaheuristic approaches for optimizing the size of a hydrogen storage-based microgrid, with the aims of minimizing the microgrid's cost and ensuring the ability to regulate the energy flow within the system. In addition, the optimization algorithm considers the power of the photovoltaic (PV) system, electrolyzer, fuel cell, and the capacity of the battery and hydrogen tank as decision variables. Results of numerical simulations proved that, under the above problem framework, the particle swarm optimization algorithm outperforms the rest. The algorithm is able to produce an optimized microgrid with a 25.3% lower annual system cost compared to the worst-performing algorithm. Its ability to escape the local optimum solution is also showcased. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under theCCBY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 549
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of different metaheuristic optimization algorithms on hydrogen storage-based microgrid sizing
    Phan-Van, Long
    Takano, Hirotaka
    Duc, Tuyen Nguyen
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2023, 9 : 542 - 549
  • [2] Comparison of Two Metaheuristic Algorithms on Sizing and Topology Optimization of Trusses and Mathematical Functions
    Mortazavi, Ali
    Togan, Vedat
    Daloglu, Ayse
    Nuhoglu, Ayhan
    [J]. GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2018, 31 (02): : 416 - 435
  • [3] Algorithms comparison for hydrogen storage predictive control on an islanded microgrid
    Gauche, Adrien
    Morin, David
    Chenouard, Raphael
    Ghanes, Malek
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2023, 56 (02): : 7966 - 7971
  • [4] Microgrid energy management using metaheuristic optimization algorithms
    Suresh, Vishnu
    Janik, Przemyslaw
    Jasinski, Michal
    M. Guerrero, Josep
    Leonowicz, Zbigniew
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 134
  • [5] Comparison of different metaheuristic algorithms based on InterCriteria analysis
    Roeva, Olympia
    Fidanova, Stefka
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2018, 340 : 615 - 628
  • [6] Application of Different Optimization Algorithms for Optimal Sizing of PV/Wind/Diesel/Battery Storage Stand-Alone Hybrid Microgrid
    Diab, Ahmed A. Zaki
    Sultan, Hamdy M.
    Mohamed, Ihab S.
    Oleg, Kuznetsov N.
    Ton Duc Do
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 119223 - 119245
  • [7] Planning of renewable and storage-based standalone microgrid for reliable electrification
    Asghar, Ali
    Kamal, Md Mustafa
    Ashraf, Imtiaz
    [J]. ENERGY STORAGE, 2023, 5 (04)
  • [8] Capacity optimization of CHP microgrid based on hydrogen energy storage
    Zhang J.
    Kan S.
    Hua Y.
    Zhang X.
    You G.
    Zhang Z.
    [J]. Taiyangneng Xuebao/Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2022, 43 (06): : 428 - 434
  • [9] Comparison of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms for Quadrotor PID Controllers
    Demir, Batikan Erdem
    Demir, Funda
    [J]. TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE, 2023, 30 (04): : 1096 - 1103
  • [10] Comparison of robustness of metaheuristic algorithms for steel frame optimization
    Alberdi, Ryan
    Khandelwal, Kapil
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2015, 102 : 40 - 60