Multi-criteria assessment of inland and offshore carbon dioxide transport options

被引:7
|
作者
Oeuvray, Pauline [1 ]
Burger, Johannes [1 ]
Roussanaly, Simon [2 ]
Mazzotti, Marco [1 ]
Becattini, Viola [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Energy & Proc Engn, Sonneggstr 3, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] SINTEF Energy Res, Sem Saelandsvei 11, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
CO2 supply chains; CO2; transport; networks; CCS; Hard to abate sectors; CO2; TRANSPORT; PIPELINE TRANSPORT; TECHNOECONOMIC EVALUATION; FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION; SUPPLY CHAIN; CAPTURE; OPTIMIZATION; STORAGE; CCS; BENCHMARKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140781
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Transport is a key element of carbon dioxide (CO2) capture, transport, and storage (CCTS) supply chains. Early movers, particularly inland emitters (e.g., in continental Europe), do not yet have access to a fully developed CO2 network infrastructure connecting them with the offshore storage hubs (e.g., in the European northern seas, as these belong to the first wave of storage infrastructure that will be developed in Europe). Therefore, specific source -to -sink CCTS supply chains combining and integrating different transport options must be developed and deployed first. In this work we analyse such transport options, which include (i) tank containers that can be transported by trucks, trains, barges, or ships, (ii) dedicated tanks permanently integrated into trucks, trains, barges, or ships, and (iii) pipelines. We develop general and portable methods, criteria, and correlations to determine the cost of transport through any given connection between two nodes in a CO2 network infrastructure, using any of the modes of transport above, as a function of distance and capacity. In particular, the correlations are based on real data collected through interviews with service providers and stakeholders. Based on the associated techno-economic assessment and the consideration of additional performance indicators of a more holistic nature, we carry out a multi -criteria assessment of the different transport options. Such multi -criteria approach allows for a holistic and transparent comparative assessment of the different alternatives for a whole CCTS supply chain, as illustrated with reference to a very specific connection.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Towards a multi-criteria methodology for assessment of geological carbon storage options
    Gough, Clair
    Shackley, Simon
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2006, 74 (1-3) : 141 - 174
  • [2] Towards a Multi-Criteria Methodology for Assessment of Geological Carbon Storage Options
    Clair Gough
    Simon Shackley
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2006, 74 : 141 - 174
  • [3] Multi-criteria approach for the environmental impact assessment of inland aquaculture
    Mancini, Laura
    Aulicino, Francesca Anna
    Marcheggiani, Stefania
    D'Angelo, Anna Maria
    Pierdominici, Elio
    Puccinelli, Camilla
    Scenati, Raffaele
    Tancioni, Lorenzo
    [J]. ANNALI DELL ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITA, 2010, 46 (03): : 317 - 322
  • [4] Multi-criteria improvement of options
    Imoussaten, Abdelhak
    Montmain, Jacky
    Trousset, Francois
    Labreuche, Christophe
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR FUZZY LOGIC AND TECHNOLOGY (EUSFLAT-2011) AND LFA-2011, 2011, : 1030 - 1037
  • [5] Multi-criteria assessment of offshore wind turbine support structures
    Lozano-Minguez, E.
    Kolios, A. J.
    Brennan, F. P.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (11) : 2831 - 2837
  • [6] A multi-criteria port suitability assessment for developments in the offshore wind industry
    Akbari, Negar
    Irawan, Chandra A.
    Jones, Dylan F.
    Menachof, David
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 102 : 118 - 133
  • [7] A multi-criteria decision analysis assessment of waste paper management options
    Hanan, Deirdre
    Burnley, Stephen
    Cooke, David
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 33 (03) : 566 - 573
  • [8] Multi-Criteria Sustainability Assessment in Transport Planning for Recreational Travel
    Chow, Joseph Y. J.
    Hernandez, Sarah V.
    Bhagat, Ankoor
    McNally, Michael G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION, 2014, 8 (02) : 151 - 175
  • [9] Multi-criteria Decision Model for the Assessment of Offshore Wind Energy Potential of Tunisia
    Zahmoul, Houda
    El Sayed, Ahmad
    Poyrazoglu, Gokturk
    [J]. 2021 SIXTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL VEHICLES AND RENEWABLE ENERGIES (EVER), 2021,
  • [10] Multi-criteria evaluation for CHP system options
    Pilavachi, P. A.
    Roumpeas, C. P.
    Minett, S.
    Afgan, N. H.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 47 (20) : 3519 - 3529