Bullshit consumption: What lockdowns tell us about work-and-spend lives and care-full alternatives

被引:1
|
作者
Molesworth, Mike [1 ,4 ]
Grigore, Georgiana [2 ]
Patsiaouras, Georgios [2 ]
Moufahim, Mona [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, England
[2] Univ Leicester, Sch Business, Leicester, England
[3] Stirling Univ, Stirling Management Sch, Stirling, Scotland
[4] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Business Sch, Univ House, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
关键词
Bullshit; care; consumption; lockdown; work-and-spend; CONSUMERS;
D O I
10.1177/14705931241230047
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
COVID-19 disrupted 'non-essential' work and consumption, providing an unparalleled opportunity to examine work-and-spend culture, which we do via 44 in-depth interviews that capture experiences and reflections during UK lockdowns. Deploying Graeber's conceptualisation of 'bullshit jobs' and related critiques of consumption, we first consider the possibility that contemporary work-and-spend lifestyles may deny the normative separation of work as worthy toil and consumption as its pleasurable opposite. Within such experience, and in addition to Graeber's bullshit jobs, we find a parallel in bullshit consumption at work, in order to work, and because of work. Yet our findings also highlight that when freed from bullshit, participants engage in more caring practices for the self, others, and their possessions. We propose that much of our work-and-spend lives might be bullshit: routines that promise status, virtue, freedom, and pleasure, but feel meaningless, while displacing satisfying experiences of care. We conclude that a focus on subtractive logics - cutting the bullshit! - can activate both new critiques and optimism about societal arrangements.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] Interprofessional learning at work: what spatial theory can tell us about workplace learning in an acute care ward
    Gregory, Linda Rosemary
    Hopwood, Nick
    Boud, David
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2014, 28 (03) : 200 - 205