Learning Spatial Regularization Correlation Filters With the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion in RKHS for UAV Tracking

被引:6
|
作者
An, Zhiyong [1 ]
Wang, Xiumin [1 ]
Li, Bo [1 ]
Fu, Jingyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Technol & Business Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Yantai 264005, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Target tracking; Correlation; Feature extraction; Information filters; Gray-scale; Training; Autonomous aerial vehicles; Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion (HSIC); object tracking; reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS); spatial regularization; unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV);
D O I
10.1109/TIM.2023.3265106
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) object tracking has been widely used in military and civilian tasks and is very challenging due to factors such as aerial view, low resolution (LR), background clutter (BC), and small scale. Currently, many correlation filter (CF) methods for UAV object tracking introduce predefined regularization terms to improve the discriminative power. However, the predefined spatial constraints neither exploit the changing foreground and background information during tracking nor adapt to complex video attributes, such as BC, illumination variation (IV), and viewpoint change (VC). In this work, a novel CF tracking model is proposed to learn the spatial regularization CFs with the Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion (HSIC_SRCF) in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) for UAV tracking. First, HSIC _SRCF learns the high confidence spatial weight coefficient for the filters, which encourages the filters to focus on the more reliable region. Second, the alternative direction method of multipliers (ADMM) can be used to optimize the proposed model, and the subproblems of the model have closed-form solutions. Third, the model update scheme uses RKHS and the peak-to-sidelobe ratio (PSR) to obtain the confidence of the object bounding box and reduce the effect of background noise for the UAV object. The ablation study shows that the proposed approach achieves a precision of 0.699 and a success rate of 0.607, which are 2.8% higher and 2.2% higher, respectively, than the baseline AutoTrack on the UAV123@10fps. Experimental results on four popular UAV datasets, including VisDrone2018-test-dev, UAV123@10fps, UAV123, and UAVDT, show that our approach performs favorably compared with current state-of-the-art methods.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robust Learning with the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion
    Greenfeld, Daniel
    Shalit, Uri
    25TH AMERICAS CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS (AMCIS 2019), 2019,
  • [2] Kernel Learning with Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion
    Wang, Tinghua
    Li, Wei
    He, Xianwen
    PATTERN RECOGNITION (CCPR 2016), PT I, 2016, 662 : 720 - 730
  • [3] Robust Learning with the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion
    Greenfeld, Daniel
    Shalit, Uri
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 119, 2020, 119
  • [4] Kernel learning and optimization with Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion
    Wang, Tinghua
    Li, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, 2018, 9 (10) : 1707 - 1717
  • [5] Learning with Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion: A review and new perspectives
    Wang, Tinghua
    Dai, Xiaolu
    Liu, Yuze
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2021, 234
  • [6] Local tangent space alignment based on Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion regularization
    Zheng, Xinghua
    Ma, Zhengming
    Li, Lei
    PATTERN ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 23 (02) : 855 - 868
  • [7] Sequence Alignment with the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion
    Campbell, Jordan
    Lewis, J. P.
    Seol, Yeongho
    PROCEEDINGS CVMP 2018: THE 15TH ACM SIGGRAPH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON VISUAL MEDIA PRODUCTION, 2018,
  • [8] Sensitivity maps of the Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion
    Perez-Suay, Adrian
    Camps-Valls, Gustau
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 70 : 1054 - 1063
  • [9] Nystrom M -Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion
    Kalinke, Florian
    Szabo, Zoltan
    UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 216 : 1005 - 1015
  • [10] Sparse Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion Regression
    Poignard, Benjamin
    Yamada, Makoto
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 108, 2020, 108 : 538 - 547