LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT FOR EVALUATING MIXED FARMING SYSTEMS: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS

被引:0
|
作者
Ben Abdallah, Saker [1 ]
Gallego-Elvira, Belen [1 ]
Maestre-Valero, Jose
Popa, Dana [2 ]
Balanescu, Mihaela [3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Cartagena, Agr Engn Dpt, 48 Paseo Alfonso 13, Cartagena 30203, Spain
[2] Univ Agron Sci & Vet Med Bucharest, Fac Anim Prod Engn & Management, 59 Marasti Blvd, Bucharest 011464, Romania
[3] Beia Consult Int, R&D Dept, Bucharest 041386, Romania
来源
关键词
environmental sustainability; farm-level approach; interactions; mixed farming; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; FOOD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this work was twofold: i) to characterise the main applications of the life cycle assessment (LCA) for assessing and representing mixed farming systems (MFS), and then ii) to propose a general methodological framework for conducting a comparative LCA of a case study of an MFS versus a specialised system in Romania. For this purpose, the main applications of LCA to MFS have been analysed in all its phases. Overall, the reviewed LCA studies highlighted the potential of MFS to improve environmental sustainability, but scarcity of real data hindered the assessment process. In addition, some studies focused on a single product rather than taking into account all products (crops and livestock) when comparing MFS with specialised ones. This may exclude interactions between farm components in the MFS and therefore may not reflect the overall impact of these systems. Therefore, an LCA based on a farm-level approach is recommended to provide a fairer comparison of MFS versus specialised systems.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 258
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating environmental impacts of contrasting pig farming systems with life cycle assessment
    Dourmad, J. Y.
    Ryschawy, J.
    Trousson, T.
    Bonneau, M.
    Gonzalez, J.
    Houwers, H. W. J.
    Hviid, M.
    Zimmer, C.
    Nguyen, T. L. T.
    Morgensen, L.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2014, 8 (12) : 2027 - 2037
  • [2] Evaluating the impacts of different wheat farming systems through Life Cycle Assessment
    di Cristofaro, Marco
    Marino, Stefano
    Lima, Giuseppe
    Mastronardi, Luigi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 436
  • [3] Life cycle assessment at nanoscale: review and recommendations
    Gavankar, Sheetal
    Suh, Sangwon
    Keller, Arturo F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (03): : 295 - 303
  • [4] Life cycle assessment at nanoscale: review and recommendations
    Sheetal Gavankar
    Sangwon Suh
    Arturo F. Keller
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 17 : 295 - 303
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of Swiss farming systems: I. Integrated and organic farming
    Nemecek, Thomas
    Dubois, David
    Huguenin-Elie, Olivier
    Gaillard, Gerard
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2011, 104 (03) : 217 - 232
  • [6] Future scenarios and life cycle assessment: systematic review and recommendations
    Bisinella, V
    Christensen, T. H.
    Astrup, T. F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (11): : 2143 - 2170
  • [7] Future scenarios and life cycle assessment: systematic review and recommendations
    V. Bisinella
    T. H. Christensen
    T. F. Astrup
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 2143 - 2170
  • [8] Review of environmental performance of sheep farming using life cycle assessment
    Bhatt, Akul
    Abbassi, Bassim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 293
  • [9] A review evaluating the gaps in plastic impacts in life cycle assessment
    Sabate, Kealohi
    Kendall, Alissa
    [J]. CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 14
  • [10] Coupling big data and life cycle assessment: A review, recommendations, and prospects
    Li, Junjie
    Tian, Yajun
    Xie, Kechang
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 153