Prophylactic ECMO Support during Elective Coronary Percutaneous Interventions in High-Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience

被引:2
|
作者
Ungureanu, Claudiu [1 ]
Blaimont, Marc [1 ]
Trine, Hugues [2 ]
Henin, Pierre [2 ]
Courcelle, Romain [2 ]
Laurent, Yves [2 ]
Van Ruyssevelt, Patrick [3 ]
Lepiece, Caroline [1 ]
Huberlant, Vincent [2 ]
机构
[1] Jolimont Hosp, Cardiovasc Dept, La Louviere, Belgium
[2] Jolimont Hosp, Intens Care Dept, La Louviere, Belgium
[3] Jolimont Hosp, Cardiothorac Surg Dept, La Louviere, Belgium
关键词
MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATOR; PROFOUND CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK; OUTCOMES; DEVICES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1155/2023/5332038
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction. Evidence regarding the impact of prophylactic implantation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is limited. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the outcome during index hospitalization and 3 years after interventions. Methods. This is an observational retrospective study including all patients undergoing elective, high-risk PCI and receiving VA-ECMO for cardiopulmonary support. Primary endpoints were in-hospital and 3- year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rates. Secondary endpoints were vascular complications, bleeding, and procedural success. Results. Nine patients were included in total. All patients were considered inoperable by the local heart team, and 1 patient had a previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). All patients were hospitalized for an acute heart failure episode 30 days before the index procedure. Severe left ventricular dysfunction was present in 8 patients. The main target vessel was the left main coronary artery in 5 cases. Complex PCI techniques were used: bifurcations with 2 stents in 8 patients, rotational atherectomy was performed in 3, and coronary lithoplasty in 1 case. PCI was successful in all of the patients with revascularization of all target and additional lesions. Eight of the 9 patients survived for at least 30 days after the procedure, and 7 patients survived for 3 years after the procedure. Regarding the complication rate, 2 patients suffered from limb ischemia and were treated by an antegrade perfusion, 1 patient had a femoral perforation that needed surgical repair, 6 patients had a hematoma, 5 patients had a significant drop in hemoglobin of more than 2 g/dl and received blood transfusions, 2 patients were treated for septicemia, and 2 patients needed hemodialysis. Conclusions. Prophylactic use of VA-ECMO in elective patients is an acceptable strategy for revascularization by high-risk coronary percutaneous interventions with good long-term outcomes for patients considered inoperable when a clear clinical benefit is expected. Regarding the potential risk of complications due to a VA-ECMO system, the selection of candidates in our series was based on a multiparameter analysis. The two main triggers in favor of prophylactic VA-ECMO in our studies were the presence of a recent heart failure episode and the high probability of periprocedural prolonged impairment of the coronary flow through the major epicardial artery.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcome of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for complex high-risk elective percutaneous coronary interventions: A single-center experience
    Tomasello, Salvatore Davide
    Boukhris, Marouane
    Ganyukov, Vladimir
    Galassi, Alfredo R.
    Shukevich, Dmitri
    Haes, Boris
    Kochergin, Nikita
    Tarasov, Roman
    Popov, Vadim
    Barbarash, Leonid
    [J]. HEART & LUNG, 2015, 44 (04): : 309 - 313
  • [2] Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Complex High-Risk Elective Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature
    Shaukat, Arslan
    Hryniewicz-Czeneszew, Katarzyna
    Sun, Benjamin
    Mudy, Karol
    Wilson, Kelly
    Tajti, Peter
    Stanberry, Larissa
    Garberich, Ross
    Sandoval, Yader
    Burke, M. Nicholas
    Chavez, Ivan
    Gossl, Mario
    Henry, Timothy
    Lips, Daniel
    Mooney, Michael
    Poulose, Anil
    Sorajja, Paul
    Traverse, Jay
    Wang, Yale
    Bradley, Steven
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 30 (12): : 456 - 460
  • [3] Impella support for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: A single-center experience
    Brandao, Mariana
    Caeiro, Daniel
    Pires-Morais, Gustavo
    Almeida, Joao Goncalves
    Teixeira, Pedro Goncalves
    Silva, Marisa Passos
    Ponte, Marta
    Dias, Adelaide
    Oliveira, Marco
    Rodrigues, Alberto
    Braga, Pedro
    [J]. REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2021, 40 (11) : 853 - 861
  • [4] In-Hospital and Mid-Term Outcomes of ECMO Support During Coronary, Structural, or Combined Percutaneous Cardiac Intervention in High-Risk Patients - A Single-Center Experience
    Brscic, Elvis
    Rovero, Gabriella
    Testa, Katiuscia
    Sori, Pierpaolo
    Iannaccone, Mario
    Decio, Alessandro
    Russo, Paolo
    Costa, Paolo
    Comoglio, Chiara
    Marra, Sebastiano
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2021, 32 : 63 - 67
  • [5] Single-Center Experience with the Tandem Heart Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device to Support Patients undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Al-Husami, Wael
    Yturralde, Frederick
    Mohanty, Guru
    Pastore, Christopher
    Lotun, Kapil
    Venesy, David
    Waxman, Sergio
    Pyne, Christopher
    Gossman, David
    Nesto, Richard
    Piemonte, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 20 (06): : 319 - 322
  • [6] Use of the Impella 2.5 for prophylactic circulatory support during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Alasnag, Mirvat A.
    Gardi, Delair O.
    Elder, Mahir
    Kannam, Hari
    Ali, Farhan
    Petrina, Mircea
    Kheterpal, Vipin
    Hout, Mariah S.
    Schreiber, Theodore L.
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (05) : 299 - 303
  • [7] Elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions supported by extracorporeal life support
    Vainer, Jindra
    van Ommen, Vincent
    Maessen, Jos
    Geskes, Gijs
    Lamerichs, Leon
    Waltenberger, Johannes
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 99 (06): : 771 - 773
  • [8] High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with the Tandem Heart and Impella Devices: A Single-Center Experience
    Schwartz, Bryan G.
    Ludeman, Daniel J.
    Mayeda, Guy S.
    Kloner, Robert A.
    Economides, Christina
    Burstein, Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 23 (10): : 417 - 424
  • [9] Percutaneous interventions of coronary artery fistulas: a single-center experience
    Ates, Ahmet Hakan
    Kivrak, Ahmet
    Sener, Yusuf Ziya
    Kilic, Gul Sinem
    Kaya, Ergun Baris
    Sahiner, Mehmet Levent
    Ozer, Necla
    Aytemir, Kudret
    [J]. POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2023, 19 (04): : 351 - 358
  • [10] Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in High-Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience with More than 350 Cases
    Nouralizadeh, Akbar
    Lashay, Alireza
    Ziaee, Seyed Amir Mohsen
    Ahanian, Ali
    Sharifi, Seyed Hossein Hosseini
    Nikkar, Mohammad Masoud
    Ojand, Ardalan
    Soltani, Mohammad Hossein
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2013, 90 (04) : 394 - 398