Clinical evaluation of thermo-viscous and sonic fill-activated bulk fill composite restorations

被引:0
|
作者
Morsy, Kholood El Saved [1 ]
Salama, Mirvat Mohamed [2 ]
Genaid, Thuraia Mohamed [2 ]
机构
[1] Tanta Univ, Restorat Dent, Tanta, Egypt
[2] Tanta Univ, Restorat Dent, Fac Dent, Tanta, Egypt
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY | 2023年 / 36卷 / 02期
关键词
RESIN-COMPOSITE; VOID FORMATION; VISCOSITY; DELIVERY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical performance of VisCalor and SonicFill versus the conventionally applied bulk fill composite restorations in Class I cavities over 18 -month follow-up periods. Methods: 60 posterior teeth were used in this study in 20 patients (age ranging from 25-40). They were randomly divided into three equal groups (n=20) based on the type of restorative material employed. Each resin composite restorative system with the recommended manufacturer's adhesive was applied and cured according to the manufacturer's instructions. All restorations were evaluated clinically at baseline (after 24 hours), 6, 12, and 18 months according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) by two examiners for retention, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, color match, and anatomical form. Results: All tested groups exhibited no significant difference regarding all the clinical evaluation criteria at all evaluation periods, except for marginal adaptation and discoloration. Marginal changes (Bravo score) were detected only after 12 months in 15% of Filtek bulk fill restorations (Group 1) only while all VisCalor bulk fill restorations in Group 2 and SonicFill 2 restorations in Group 3 recorded 100% Alpha scoring, with no statistically significant difference among the groups (P= 0.050). After 18 months, Bravo scores increased to 30% in Group 1, while 5 and 10% Bravo scores were recorded in restorations of Groups 2 and 3, respectively with a statistically significant difference (P= 0.049) among them. Marginal discoloration was observed after 12 months in Group 1 only, however, no statistically significant difference was found among the groups (P= 0.126). At 18 months, all tested groups had a statistically significant difference between them (P= 0.027). (Am J Dent 2023;36:81-85). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Reducing the composite viscosity either by thermo-viscous technology or by sonic activation can improve the material adaptation to the cavity walls and margins, thus improving the clinical performance.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 85
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The 24 months clinical evaluation of class II bulk fill composite restorations
    Akarsu, Serdar
    Cender, Ebru Uslu
    Yilmaz, Tugce
    Yildiz, Dilara
    Karademir, Sultan Aktug
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL HEALTH AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 13 (02): : 72 - 77
  • [2] Clinical and radiographic evaluation of high viscosity bulk-fill resin composite restorations
    Alves Berti, Luiza Salles
    Turssi, Cecilia Pedroso
    Botelho do Amaral, Flavia Lucisano
    Basting, Roberta Tarkany
    Cintra Junqueira, Jose Luiz
    Panzarella, Francine Kuhl
    Reis, Andre Figueiredo
    Gomes Franca, Fabiana Mantovani
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2020, 33 (04): : 213 - 217
  • [3] Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations
    Yazici, Ayse Ruya
    Kutuk, Zeynep Bilge
    Ergin, Esra
    Karahan, Sevilay
    Antonson, Sibel A.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (01) : 417 - 426
  • [4] Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations
    Ayse Ruya Yazici
    Zeynep Bilge Kutuk
    Esra Ergin
    Sevilay Karahan
    Sibel A. Antonson
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 417 - 426
  • [5] Evaluation of microleakage in class-II bulk-fill composite restorations
    Turkistani, Alaa
    Nasir, Adnan
    Merdad, Yasser
    Jamleh, Ahmed
    Alshouibi, Ehab
    Sadr, Alireza
    Tagami, Junji
    Bakhsh, Turki A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2020, 15 (04) : 486 - 492
  • [6] Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations
    Yazici, A. R.
    Antonson, S. A.
    Kutuk, Z. B.
    Ergin, E.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2017, 42 (05) : 478 - 485
  • [7] Evaluation of micro-CT in the assessment of microleakage under bulk fill composite restorations
    Daghrery, Arwa
    Yaman, Peter
    Lynch, Michelle
    Dennison, Joseph
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 35 (03): : 128 - 132
  • [8] Clinical Evaluation of Class II Restorations Made with Bulk-fill Restorative Materials
    Gurses, Merve
    Inan, Bahar
    Cobanoglu, Nevin
    [J]. BEZMIALEM SCIENCE, 2023, 11 (02): : 141 - 150
  • [9] Margin Integrity of Bulk-Fill Composite Restorations in Primary Teeth
    Paganini, Alina
    Attin, Thomas
    Tauboeck, Tobias T.
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (17)
  • [10] Stress distribution of bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations
    Ausiello, Pietro
    Ciaramella, Stefano
    Garcia-Godoy, Franklin
    Martorelli, Massimo
    Sorrentino, Roberto
    Gloria, Antonio
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2017, 30 (04): : 227 - 232