Uptake of Genetic Research Results and Patient-Reported Outcomes With Return of Results Incorporating Web-Based Predisclosure Education

被引:1
|
作者
Kilbride, Madison [1 ]
Egleston, Brian L. [2 ]
Chung, Wendy K. [3 ]
Olopade, Olufunmilayo [4 ]
Maxwell, Kara N. [5 ]
Shah, Payal [5 ]
Churpek, Jane E. [4 ]
Fleisher, Linda [2 ]
Terry, Mary Beth [6 ,7 ]
Fetzer, Dominique [5 ]
Gaieski, Jill Bennett [5 ]
Bulafka, Jessica [6 ,7 ]
Espinal, Aileen [6 ,7 ]
Karpink, Kelsey [5 ]
Walser, Sarah [5 ]
Singleton, Davone [5 ]
Palese, Monica [4 ]
Siljander, Ilona [4 ]
Brandt, Amanda [5 ]
Clark, Dana [5 ]
Koval, Carrie [8 ]
Wynn, Julia [9 ]
Long, Jessica M. [5 ]
Mckenna, Danielle [5 ]
Powers, Jacquelyn [5 ]
Nielsen, Sarah [4 ]
Domchek, Susan M. [5 ]
Nathanson, Katherine L. [10 ]
Bradbury, Angela R. [5 ,11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Philosophy, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Temple Univ, Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, Herbert Irving Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Penn, Abramson Canc Ctr, Div Hematol Oncol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, Herbert Irving Comprehens Canc Ctr, New York, NY USA
[7] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, New York, NY USA
[8] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, New York, NY USA
[9] Columbia Univ, Dept Pediat, New York, NY USA
[10] Univ Penn, Div Translat Med & Human Genet, Philadelphia, PA USA
[11] Univ Penn, Dept Med Eth & Hlth Policy, Philadelphia, PA USA
[12] Dept Med Eth & Hlth Policy, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, 3 West Perelman,3400 Civ Ctr Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
OVARIAN-CANCER; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; HEREDITARY BREAST; GENOMIC BIOBANKS; PARTICIPANTS; FAMILIES; IMPACT; IMPLEMENTATION; INFORMATION; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.22.00516
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSEWe developed a web-based education intervention as an alternative to predisclosure education with a genetic counselor (GC) to reduce participant burden and provider costs with return of genetic research results.METHODSWomen at three sites who participated in 11 gene discovery research studies were contacted to consider receiving cancer genetic research results. Participants could complete predisclosure education through web education or with a GC. Outcomes included uptake of research results, factors associated with uptake, and patient-reported outcomes.RESULTSOf 819 participants, 178 actively (21.7%) and 167 passively (20.4%) declined return of results; 474 (57.9%) were enrolled. Most (60.3%) received results although this was lower than the 70% uptake we hypothesized. Passive and active decliners were more likely to be Black, to have less education, and to have not received phone follow-up after the invitation letter. Most participants selected web education (88.5%) as an alternative to speaking with a GC, but some did not complete or receive results. Knowledge increased significantly from baseline to other time points with no significant differences between those who received web versus GC education. There were no significant increases in distress between web and GC education.CONCLUSIONInterest in web-based predisclosure education for return of genetic research results was high although it did not increase uptake of results. We found no negative patient-reported outcomes with web education, suggesting that it is a viable alternative delivery model for reducing burdens and costs of returning genetic research results. Attention to attrition and lower uptake of results among Black participants and those with less formal education are important areas for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:4905 / +
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interest in and outcomes with web-based education for return of genetic research results for inherited susceptibility to breast cancer
    Bradbury, Angela R.
    Gaieski, Jill B.
    Egleston, Brian L.
    Patrick-Miller, Linda J.
    Chung, Wendy
    Olopade, Olufunmilayo I.
    Maxwell, Kara Noelle
    Walser, Sarah
    Fetzer, Dominique
    Brower, Jamie
    Brandt, Amanda C.
    Clark, Dana
    DiGiovanni, Laura
    Long, Jessica M.
    Powers, Jacquelyn
    Mckenna, Danielle
    Stopfer, Jill
    Weipert, Caroline M.
    Nathanson, Kate
    Domchek, Susan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [2] Implementation of a Web-Based Patient-Reported Outcomes Research Program
    Costello, Kathleen
    Foley, John
    Miller, Deborah
    Deering, Kathleen L.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2011, 76 (09) : A479 - A479
  • [3] Web-Based Return of Individual Patient-Reported Outcome Results Among Patients With Lymphoma: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Oerlemans, Simone
    Arts, Lindy Paulina Johanna
    Kieffer, Jacobien M.
    Prins, Judith
    Hoogendoorn, Mels
    van der Poel, Marjolein
    Koster, Ad
    Lensen, Chantal
    Stevens, Wendy Bernadina Catharina
    Issa, Djamila
    Pruijt, Johannes F. M.
    Oosterveld, Margriet
    van der Griend, Rene
    Nijziel, Marten
    Tick, Lidwine
    Posthuma, Eduardus F. M.
    van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (12)
  • [4] CREATION OF A WEB-BASED MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES RESEARCH PROGRAM
    Deering, K.
    Agarwal, S. S.
    Rajagopalan, K.
    Harshaw, Q.
    Shillington, A. C.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (03) : A208 - A208
  • [5] Research participants' experiences with return of genetic research results and preferences for web-based alternatives
    Gaieski, Jill B.
    Patrick-Miller, Linda
    Egleston, Brian L.
    Maxwell, Kara N.
    Walser, Sarah
    DiGiovanni, Laura
    Brower, Jamie
    Fetzer, Dominique
    Ganzak, Amanda
    McKenna, Danielle
    Long, Jessica M.
    Powers, Jacquelyn
    Stopfer, Jill E.
    Nathanson, Katherine L.
    Domchek, Susan M.
    Bradbury, Angela R.
    [J]. MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (09):
  • [6] Interpreting and reporting results based on patient-reported outcomes
    Revicki, Dennis A.
    Erickson, Pennifer A.
    Sloan, Jeff A.
    Dueck, Amylou
    Guess, Harry
    Santanello, Nancy C.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 : S116 - S124
  • [7] Analysis and interpretation of results based on patient-reported outcomes
    Sloan, Jeff A.
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    Erickson, Pennifer A.
    Guess, Harry
    Revicki, Dennis A.
    Santanello, Nancy C.
    Sloan, Jeff A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 : S106 - S115
  • [8] Are You Ready? Practical Considerations When Incorporating Web-based Electronic Data Capture Systems of Patient-reported Outcomes in Clinical Research
    Klagholz, Stephen
    Wehrlen, Leslie
    Ross, Alyson
    Stoops, Elyssa
    Wiener, Lori
    Zadeh, Sima
    Yang, Li
    Bevans, Margaret
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 24 : 166 - 167
  • [9] Genetic counselling experience in Iceland of web-based return of BRCA2 research results
    Stefansdottir, V.
    Thorolfsdottir, E. T.
    Gunnarsdottir, B. B.
    Ulfarsdottir, A.
    Jonsdottir, T.
    Hognason, H. B.
    Jonsson, J. J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 : 1124 - 1125
  • [10] Feasibility of conducting a web-based survey of patient-reported outcomes and rehabilitation progress
    Howard, Jennifer S.
    Toonstra, Jenny L.
    Meade, Amanda R.
    Conley, Caitlin E. Whale
    Mattacola, Carl G.
    [J]. DIGITAL HEALTH, 2016, 2