Exploring Capabilities of Large Language Models such as ChatGPT in Radiation

被引:4
|
作者
Dennstadt, Fabio [1 ]
Hastings, Janna [2 ,3 ]
Putora, Paul Martin [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Vu, Erwin [1 ]
Fischer, Galina F. [1 ]
Suveg, Krisztian [1 ]
Glatzer, Markus [1 ]
Riggenbach, Elena [4 ,5 ]
Ha, Hong-Linh [4 ,5 ]
Cihoric, Nikola [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kantonsspital St Gallen, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] Univ St Gallen, Sch Med, St Gallen, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Inst Implementat Sci Hlth Care, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Bern Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
[5] Univ Bern, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
ONCOLOGY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2023.101400
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Technological progress of machine learning and natural language processing has led to the development of large language models (LLMs), capable of producing well -formed text responses and providing natural language access to knowledge. Modern conversational LLMs such as ChatGPT have shown remarkable capabilities across a variety of fields, including medicine. These models may assess even highly specialized medical knowledge within specific disciplines, such as radiation therapy. We conducted an exploratory study to examine the capabilities of ChatGPT to answer questions in radiation therapy. Methods and Materials: A set of multiple-choice questions about clinical, physics, and biology general knowledge in radiation oncology as well as a set of open-ended questions were created. These were given as prompts to the LLM ChatGPT, and the answers were collected and analyzed. For the multiple-choice questions, it was checked how many of the answers of the model could be clearly assigned to one of the allowed multiple -choice -answers, and the proportion of correct answers was determined. For the open-ended questions, independent blinded radiation oncologists evaluated the quality of the answers regarding correctness and usefulness on a 5point Likert scale. Furthermore, the evaluators were asked to provide suggestions for improving the quality of the answers. Results: For 70 multiple-choice questions, ChatGPT gave valid answers in 66 cases (94.3%). In 60.61% of the valid answers, the selected answer was correct (50.0% of clinical questions, 78.6% of physics questions, and 58.3% of biology questions). For 25 open-ended questions, 12 answers of ChatGPT were considered as "acceptable," "good," or "very good" regarding both correctness and helpfulness by all 6 participating radiation oncologists. Overall, the answers were considered "very good" in 29.3% and 28%, "good" in 28% and 29.3%, "acceptable" in 19.3% and 19.3%, "bad" in 9.3% and 9.3%, and "very bad" in 14% and 14% regarding correctness/helpfulness. Conclusions: Modern conversational LLMs such as ChatGPT can provide satisfying answers to many relevant questions in radiation therapy. As they still fall short of consistently providing correct information, it is problematic to use them for obtaining medical information. As LLMs will further improve in the future, they are expected to have an increasing impact not only on general society, but also on clinical practice, including radiation oncology. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Large Language Models for Radiation Oncology Decision Support
    Putz, Florian
    Haderlein, Marlen
    Lettmaier, Sebastian
    Semrau, Sabine
    Fietkau, Rainer
    Huang, Yixing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2024, 118 (04): : 900 - 904
  • [2] Exploring the capabilities and limitations of large language models in the electric energy sector
    Majumder, Subir
    Dong, Lin
    Doudi, Fatemeh
    Cai, Yuting
    Tian, Chao
    Kalathil, Dileep
    Ding, Kevin
    Thatte, Anupam A.
    Li, Na
    Xie, Le
    JOULE, 2024, 8 (06) : 1544 - 1549
  • [3] ChatGPT: Where Is a Silver Lining? Exploring the realm of GPT and large language models
    Tikhonova, Elena
    Raitskaya, Lilia
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION, 2023, 9 (03): : 5 - 11
  • [4] ChatGPT and large language models in gastroenterology
    Sharma, Prateek
    Parasa, Sravanthi
    NATURE REVIEWS GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 20 (08) : 481 - 482
  • [5] ChatGPT and large language models in gastroenterology
    Prateek Sharma
    Sravanthi Parasa
    Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2023, 20 : 481 - 482
  • [6] Exploring the role of large language models in radiation emergency response
    Chandra, Anirudh
    Chakraborty, Abinash
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [7] LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (LLMS) AND CHATGPT FOR BIOMEDICINE
    Arighi, Cecilia
    Brenner, Steven
    Lu, Zhiyong
    BIOCOMPUTING 2024, PSB 2024, 2024, : 641 - 644
  • [8] Introspective Capabilities in Large Language Models
    Long, Robert
    JOURNAL OF CONSCIOUSNESS STUDIES, 2023, 30 (9-10) : 143 - 153
  • [9] Exploring ChatGPT Capabilities and Limitations: A Survey
    Koubaa, Anis
    Boulila, Wadii
    Ghouti, Lahouari
    Alzahem, Ayyub
    Latif, Shahid
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 118698 - 118721
  • [10] The Working Limitations of Large Language Models: Overestimating the capabilities of AI models like ChatGPT can lead to unreliable applications.
    Burtsev, Mikhail
    Reeves, Martin
    Job, Adam
    MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024, 65 (02)