Ecological Niche Models using MaxEnt in Google Earth Engine: Evaluation, guidelines and recommendations

被引:10
|
作者
Campos, Joao C. [1 ,5 ]
Garcia, Nuno [1 ]
Alirio, Joao [2 ]
Arenas-Castro, Salvador [4 ]
Teodoro, Ana C. [2 ,3 ]
Sillero, Neftali [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Sci, CICGE Ctr Invest Ciencias Geoespaciais, Alameda Monte Virgem, P-4430146 Vila Nova De Gaia, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Sci, Dept Geosci Environm & Land Planning, P-4169007 Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Earth Sci Inst ICT, Pole FCUP, P-4169007 Porto, Portugal
[4] Univ Cordoba, Fac Sci, Dept Bot Ecol & Plant Physiol, Area Ecol, Campus Rabanales, Cordoba 14014, Spain
[5] Univ Porto, Fac Sci, Ctr Invest Ciencias Geoespaciais, Alameda Monte Virgem, P-4430146 Vila Nova De Gaia, Portugal
关键词
Cloud-based platform; Correlative models; Environmental predictors; Habitat suitability models; Maximum entropy; Species distribution models; SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS; SAMPLING BIAS; RESOLUTION; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102147
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Google Earth Engine (GEE) has revolutionized geospatial analyses by fast-processing formerly demanding ana-lyses from multiple research areas. Recently, maximum entropy (MaxEnt), the most commonly used method in ecological niche models (ENMs), was integrated into GEE. This integration can significantly enhance modeling efficiency and encourage multidisciplinary approaches of ENMs, but an evaluation assessment of MaxEnt in GEE is lacking. Herein, we present the first MaxEnt models in GEE, as well as its first statistical and spatial evaluation. We also identify the limitations of the approach, providing guidelines and recommendations for its easier applicability in GEE.We tested MaxEnt in GEE using 11 case studies. For each case, we used species of different taxa (insects, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals) distributed across global and regional extents. Each species occupied habitats with distinct environmental characteristics (nine terrestrial and two marine species) and within diver-gent ecoregions across five continents. The models were performed in GEE and Maxent software, and both ap-proaches were contrasted for their model discrimination performance (assessed by eight evaluation metrics) and spatial consistency (correlation analyses and two measures of niche overlap/equivalency).MaxEnt in GEE allows setting several parameters, but important analyses and outputs are unavailable, such as automatic selection of background data, model replicates, and analyses of variable importance (concretely, jackknife analyses and response curves). GEE provided MaxEnt models with high discrimination performance (area under the curve mean between all species models of 0.90) and with spatial equivalency in relation to Maxent software outputs (Hellinger's I mean between all species models >0.90).Our work demonstrates the first application and assessment of MaxEnt in GEE at global and regional scales. We conclude that the GEE modeling method provides ENMs with high performance and reliable spatial pre-dictions, comparable to the widely used Maxent software. We also acknowledge important limitations that should be integrated into GEE in the future, particularly those related to the assessment of variable importance. We expect that our guidelines, recommendations and potential solutions to surpass the identified limitations could help researchers easily apply MaxEnt in GEE across different research fields.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] kuenm: an R package for detailed development of ecological niche models using Maxent
    Cobos, Marlon E.
    Peterson, A. Townsend
    Barve, Narayani
    Osorio-Olvera, Luis
    PEERJ, 2019, 7
  • [2] Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and Maxent
    Peterson, A. Townsend
    Papes, Monica
    Eaton, Muir
    ECOGRAPHY, 2007, 30 (04) : 550 - 560
  • [3] Assessment of Ecological Cumulative Effect due to Mining Disturbance Using Google Earth Engine
    Yang, Wenfu
    Mu, Yao
    Zhang, Wenkai
    Wang, Wenwen
    Liu, Jin
    Peng, Junhuan
    Liu, Xiaosong
    He, Tingting
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (17)
  • [4] Implementation of species distribution models in Google Earth Engine
    Crego, Ramiro D.
    Stabach, Jared A.
    Connette, Grant
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2022, 28 (05) : 904 - 916
  • [5] An evaluation of transferability of ecological niche models
    Qiao, Huijie
    Feng, Xiao
    Escobar, Luis E.
    Peterson, A. Townsend
    Soberon, Jorge
    Zhu, Gengping
    Papes, Monica
    ECOGRAPHY, 2019, 42 (03) : 521 - 534
  • [6] Evaluation of Urban Ecological Environment Quality Based on Google Earth Engine: A Case Study in Xi'an, China
    Yang, Shuo
    Su, Hao
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2023, 32 (01): : 927 - 942
  • [7] EXPLORING GOOGLE EARTH ENGINE FOR NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS
    Anita, G.
    Bharath, H. A.
    Joshi, P. K.
    IGARSS 2023 - 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2023, : 2910 - 2913
  • [8] Classification of Indian cities using Google Earth Engine
    Agarwal, Shivani
    Nagendra, Harini
    JOURNAL OF LAND USE SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (4-6) : 425 - 439
  • [9] Drought Analysis of an Area Using Google Earth Engine
    Adapa, Jyothsna Devi
    Venkatareddy, Keesara
    DEVELOPMENTS AND APPLICATIONS OF GEOMATICS, DEVA 2022, 2024, 450 : 123 - 141
  • [10] Using the Google Earth Engine to rapidly monitor impacts of geohazards on ecological quality in highly susceptible areas
    Yan, Yuyan
    Zhuang, Qingwei
    Zan, Chanjuan
    Ren, Juan
    Yang, Liao
    Wen, Yan
    Zeng, Shuai
    Zhang, Qun
    Kong, Lu
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 132