P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

被引:0
|
作者
Khan, Nazmun N. [1 ]
Sweet, Taylor [1 ]
Harvey, Chase A. [1 ]
Warschausky, Seth [2 ]
Huggins, Jane E. [3 ,4 ]
Thompson, David E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Mike Wiegers Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Brain & Body Sensing Lab, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Adapt Cognit Assessment Lab, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Direct Brain Interface Lab, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Biomed Engn, Direct Brain Interface Lab, Ann Arbor, MI USA
来源
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
MENTAL PROSTHESIS;
D O I
10.3791/64959
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Performance estimation is a necessary step in the development and validation of Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) systems. Unfortunately, even modern BCI systems are slow, making collecting sufficient data for validation a time-consuming task for end users and experimenters alike. Yet without sufficient data, the random variation in performance can lead to false inferences about how well a BCI is working for a particular user. For example, P300 spellers commonly operate around 1-5 characters per minute. To estimate accuracy with a 5% resolution requires 20 characters (4-20 min). Despite this time investment, the confidence bounds for accuracy from 20 characters can be as much as +/- 23% depending on observed accuracy. A previously published method, Classifier-Based Latency Estimation (CBLE), was shown to be highly correlated with BCI accuracy. This work presents a protocol for using CBLE to predict a user's P300 speller accuracy from relatively few characters (similar to 3-8) of typing data. The resulting confidence bounds are tighter than those produced by traditional methods. The method can thus be used to estimate BCI performance more quickly and/or more accurately.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of Feedback Latency on P300-based Brain-computer Interface
    Arvaneh, Mahnaz
    Ward, Tomas E.
    Robertson, Ian H.
    [J]. 2015 37TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2015, : 2315 - 2318
  • [2] A P300-based brain-computer interface
    Karlovskii D.V.
    Konyshev V.A.
    Selishchev S.V.
    [J]. Biomedical Engineering, 2007, 41 (1) : 29 - 33
  • [3] Improving the Performance of P300-based Brain-Computer Interface
    Garakani, Golnoosh
    Amiri, Mahmood
    Menhaj, Mohammad Bagher
    [J]. 2016 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, INSTRUMENTATION, AND AUTOMATION (ICCIA), 2016, : 329 - 332
  • [4] MsCNN: A Deep Learning Framework for P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller
    Kundu, Sourav
    Ari, Samit
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIONICS, 2020, 2 (01): : 86 - 93
  • [5] A P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI)
    Donchin, E
    Spencer, K
    Wijesinghe, R
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 36 : S15 - S16
  • [6] An improved P300-based brain-computer interface
    Serby, H
    Yom-Tov, E
    Inbar, GF
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2005, 13 (01) : 89 - 98
  • [7] The MindGame: A P300-based brain-computer interface game
    Finke, Andrea
    Lenhardt, Alexander
    Ritter, Helge
    [J]. NEURAL NETWORKS, 2009, 22 (09) : 1329 - 1333
  • [8] A P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface for Improving Attention
    Arvaneh, Mahnaz
    Robertson, Ian H.
    Ward, Tomas E.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 12
  • [9] An adaptive P300-based online brain-computer interface
    Lenhardt, Alexander
    Kaper, Matthias
    Ritter, Helge J.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2008, 16 (02) : 121 - 130
  • [10] P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface for Internet Browsing
    Sirvent, Jose L.
    Azorin, Jose M.
    Ianez, Eduardo
    Ubeda, Andres
    Fernandez, Eduardo
    [J]. TRENDS IN PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF AGENTS AND MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, 2010, 71 : 615 - 622