Coding infant engagement in the Face-to-Face Still-Face paradigm using deep neural networks

被引:2
|
作者
Faltyn, Mateusz [1 ,6 ]
Krzeczkowski, John E. [2 ]
Cummings, Mike [3 ]
Anwar, Samia [4 ]
Zeng, Tammy [4 ]
Zahid, Isra [4 ]
Ntow, Kwadjo Otu-Boateng [5 ]
Van Lieshout, Ryan J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Math, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Math & Stat Undergraduate Program, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Integrated Biomed Engn & Hlth Sci Undergraduate Pr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Neurosci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] Univ British Columbia, Dept Math, 1984 Math Rd, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
来源
关键词
Machine learning; Deep neural networks; Face -to -Face Still -Face Task; Developmental psychology; Perinatal psychiatry; FACIAL EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101827
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Background: The Face-to-Face Still-Face (FFSF) task is a validated and commonly used observa-tional measure of mother-infant socio-emotional interactions. With the ascendence of deep learning-based facial emotion recognition, it is possible that common complex tasks, such as the coding of FFSF videos, could be coded with a high degree of accuracy by deep neural networks (DNNs). The primary objective of this study was to test the accuracy of four DNN image classi-fication models against the coding of infant engagement conducted by two trained independent manual raters.Methods: 68 mother-infant dyads completed the FFSF task at three timepoints. Two trained in-dependent raters undertook second-by-second manual coding of infant engagement into one of four classes: 1) positive affect, 2) neutral affect, 3) object/environment engagement, and 4) negative affect.Results: Training four different DNN models on 40,000 images, we achieved a maximum accuracy of 99.5% on image classification of infant frames taken from recordings of the FFSF task with a maximum inter-rater reliability (Cohen's kappa-value) of 0.993. Limitations: This study inherits all sampling and experimental limitations of the original study from which the data was taken, namely a relatively small and primarily White sample.Conclusions: Based on the extremely high classification accuracy, these findings suggest that DNNs could be used to code infant engagement in FFSF recordings. DNN image classification models may also have the potential to improve the efficiency of coding all observational tasks with ap-plications across multiple fields of human behavior research.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating the Nature of the Still-Face Effect in the Double Face-to-Face Still-Face Paradigm Using Different Comparison Groups
    DiCorcia, Jennifer A.
    Snidman, Nancy
    Sravish, Akhila V.
    Tronick, Ed
    INFANCY, 2016, 21 (03) : 332 - 352
  • [2] Differential distribution and lateralization of infant gestures and their relation to maternal gestures in the Face-to-Face Still-Face paradigm
    Montirosso, Rosario
    Cozzi, Patrizia
    Tronick, Ed
    Borgatti, Renato
    INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 35 (04): : 819 - 828
  • [3] Mother-Infant Vagal Regulation in the Face-To-Face Still-Face Paradigm Is Moderated by Maternal Sensitivity
    Moore, Ginger A.
    Hill-Soderlund, Ashley L.
    Propper, Cathi B.
    Calkins, Susan D.
    Mills-Koonce, W. Roger.
    Cox, Martha J.
    CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 80 (01) : 209 - 223
  • [4] Dynamic Infant-Parent Affect Coupling During the Face-to-Face/Still-Face
    Chow, Sy-Miin
    Haltigan, John D.
    Messinger, Daniel S.
    EMOTION, 2010, 10 (01) : 101 - 114
  • [5] Automated measurement of infant and mother Duchenne facial expressions in the Face-to-Face/Still-Face
    Ahn, Yeojin Amy
    Ertugrul, Itir Onal
    Chow, Sy-Miin
    Cohn, Jeffrey F.
    Messinger, Daniel S.
    INFANCY, 2023, 28 (05) : 910 - 929
  • [6] Effects of maternal depression and panic disorder on mother-infant interactive behavior in the face-to-face still-face paradigm
    Weinberg, M. Katherine
    Beeghly, Marjorie
    Olson, Karen L.
    Tronick, Edward
    INFANT MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (05) : 472 - 491
  • [7] Sympathetic nervous system functioning during the face-to-face still-face paradigm in the first year of life
    Klein, Louis
    Doyle, Frances L.
    Northam, Jaimie C.
    Eapen, Valsamma
    Frick, Paul J.
    Kimonis, Eva R.
    Hawes, David J.
    Moul, Caroline
    Richmond, Jenny L.
    Mehta, Divya
    Mendoza Diaz, Antonio
    Dadds, Mark R.
    DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2023, 35 (02) : 471 - 480
  • [8] Still-face redux: Infant responses to a classic and modified still-face paradigm in proximal and distal care cultures
    Broesch, Tanya
    Little, Emily E.
    Carver, Leslie J.
    Legare, Cristine H.
    INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 68
  • [9] Dyadic Flexibility during the Face-to-Face Still-Face Paradigm: A dynamic systems analysis of its temporal organization
    Sravish, Akhila V.
    Tronick, Edward
    Hollenstein, Tom
    Beeghly, Marjorie
    INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 36 (03): : 432 - 437
  • [10] Associations between Infant Behaviors during the Face-To-Face Still-Face Paradigm and Oppositional Defiant and Callous-Unemotional Behaviors in Early Childhood
    Nicholas J. Wagner
    W. Roger Mills-Koonce
    Cathi B. Propper
    Michael T. Willoughby
    Pete D. Rehder
    Ginger A. Moore
    Martha J. Cox
    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2016, 44 : 1439 - 1453