Ultrasonic bone curette in thoracic spinal decompression: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, F. Y. [1 ,2 ]
Wei, X. D. [1 ]
Yang, X. P. [1 ]
Yu, C. Q. [1 ]
Huang, S. Q. [1 ]
Ou, J. X. [1 ,2 ]
Mu, X. P. [1 ]
Wei, J. X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Acad Med Sci, Peoples Hosp Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Reg, Dept Spine Surg, Nanning, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Med Univ, Grad Sch, Nanning, Peoples R China
关键词
Ultrasonic bone curette; Thoracic spinal decom-pression; Thoracic spinal stenosis; Systematic review and meta-analysis; OSSIFIED LIGAMENTUM-FLAVUM; SYMPTOMATIC OSSIFICATION; OSTEOTOME; OUTCOMES; STENOSIS; MYELOPATHY; RESECTION; SAFETY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasonic bone curette (UBC) and conven-tional surgical instruments in thoracic laminec-tomy decompression (TLD) for the treatment of thoracic spinal stenosis (TSS) by meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two authors independently searched Medline via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang Database, and China National Knowl-edge Infrastructure for the period from the es-tablishment of the database until January 2023 to identify the studies on the safety and effica-cy of UBC vs. conventional instruments for TSS. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two researchers independently. We used RevMan 5.4 software (Review Manager Web, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) to analyze the data. RESULTS: Eight retrospective studies were included in the present work. This meta -anal-ysis revealed that no significant differences in the preoperative JOA scores, the JOA scores at the last follow-up, the improvement rate of JOA scores, and the incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leakage/dura injury were detected between the two groups (p>0.05). However, there were sig-nificant differences in the operative time and in-traoperative blood loss during single-level TLD [operative time: MD=-1.47, 95% CI (-1.86,-1.09), p<0.001; intraoperative blood loss: MD=-46.62, 95% CI (-53.83,-39.40), p<0.001], total opera-tive time [MD=-56.88, 95% CI (-69.66,-44.10), p<0.001], total intraoperative blood loss [MD= -143.52, 95% CI (-212.49,-74.54), p<0.001], the in-cidence of neurological deterioration/nerve root injury [RR= 0.29, 95% CI (0.09, 0.91), p=0.03] be-tween the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The application of UBC in TLD to treat TSS is safe and effective. UBC can significantly shorten operation time and reduce intraoperative blood loss compared to tradition-al surgical instruments. Moreover, it has the ad-vantage of reducing perioperative nerve injury.
引用
收藏
页码:4450 / 4461
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Ultrasonic Bone Curette in the Treatment of Thoracic Spinal Stenosis
    Lu, Xiang-dong
    Zhao, Yi-bo
    Zhao, Xiao-feng
    Qi, De-tai
    Yang, Xu
    Wang, Xiao-nan
    Zhou, Run-tian
    Jin, Yuan-zhang
    Zhao, Bin
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2019, 11 (06) : 1180 - 1186
  • [2] Decompression with fusion versus decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Bo
    Lv, Yao
    Wang, Zhi-Cui
    Guo, Xiu-Cheng
    Chao, Chu-Zhang
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (38) : E21973
  • [3] Effect of fusion following decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Liang, Lin
    Jiang, Wei-Min
    Li, Xue-Feng
    Wang, Heng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (09): : 14615 - 14624
  • [4] Endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Perez-Roman, Roberto J.
    Gaztanaga, Wendy
    Lu, Victor M.
    Wang, Michael Y.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2022, 36 (04) : 549 - 557
  • [5] Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wenli Chang
    Peizhi Yuwen
    Yanbing Zhu
    Ning Wei
    Chen Feng
    Yingze Zhang
    Wei Chen
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2017, 137 : 637 - 650
  • [6] Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chang, Wenli
    Yuwen, Peizhi
    Zhu, Yanbing
    Wei, Ning
    Feng, Chen
    Zhang, Yingze
    Chen, Wei
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2017, 137 (05) : 637 - 650
  • [7] Decompression versus decompression plus fusion for treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Peng
    Liu, Zhenxiu
    Liu, Hong
    Yu, Yaqiong
    Huang, Liqun
    Lu, Min
    Jin, Xiaohong
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2023, 23 (04) : 390 - 398
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of ultrasonic bone curette and high-speed drill in cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luan, Haopeng
    Peng, Cong
    Jia, Honglin
    Deng, Qiang
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 47 (06) : 2646 - 2648
  • [9] Percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Liu, Jianjun
    Zhang, Hongwei
    Zhang, Xiaogang
    He, Tao
    Zhao, Xiyun
    Wang, Zhipeng
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (20)
  • [10] Full-endoscopic versus microscopic spinal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review & meta-analysis
    Chin, Brian Zhaojie
    Yong, Jung Hahn
    Wang, Eugene
    Sim, Seth Ian
    Lin, Shuxun
    Wu, Pang Hung
    Hey, Hwee Weng Dennis
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 24 (06): : 1022 - 1033