Fact-checking of political information about the Russo-Ukrainian conflict

被引:0
|
作者
Savolainen, Reijo [1 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ, Fac Informat Technol & Commun Sci, Tampere, Finland
关键词
Disinformation; Fact-checking; Political disinformation; Political information; Russo-Ukrainian conflict; Validity of information; EPISTEMOLOGY;
D O I
10.1108/JD-10-2023-0203
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
PurposeTo elaborate the nature of fact-checking in the domain of political information by examining how fact-checkers assess the validity of claims concerning the Russo-Ukrainian conflict and how they support their assessments by drawing on evidence acquired from diverse sources of information.Design/methodology/approachDescriptive quantitative and qualitative content analysis of 128 reports written by the fact-checkers of Snopes - an established fact-checking organisation - during the period of 24 February 2022 - 28 June, 2023. For the analysis, nine evaluation grounds were identified, most of them inductively from the empirical material. It was examined how the fact-checkers employed such grounds while assessing the validity of claims and how the assessments were bolstered by evidence acquired from information sources such as newspapers.FindingsOf the 128 reports, the share of assessments indicative of the invalidity of the claims was 54.7%, while the share of positive ratings was 26.7%. The share of mixed assessments was 15.6%. In the fact-checking, two evaluation grounds, that is, the correctness of information and verifiability of an event presented in a claim formed the basis for the assessment. Depending on the topic of the claim, grounds such as temporal and spatial compatibility, as well as comparison by similarity and difference occupied a central role. Most popular sources of information offering evidence for the assessments include statements of government representatives, videos and photographs shared in social media, newspapers and television programmes.Research limitations/implicationsAs the study concentrated on fact-checking dealing with political information about a specific issue, the findings cannot be extended to concern the fact-checking practices in other contexts.Originality/valueThe study is among the first to characterise how fact-checkers employ evaluation grounds of diverse kind while assessing the validity of political information.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 97
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fact-checking in war: Types of hoaxes and trends from a year of disinformation in the Russo-Ukrainian war
    Magallon-Rosa, Raul
    Fernandez-Castrillo, Carolina
    Garriga, Miriam
    PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2023, 32 (05):
  • [2] Cultural Heritage in the Russo-Ukrainian War: a Victim in the Conflict
    Ivanysko, Svitlana
    Kazakevych, Gennadii
    Shydlovskyi, Pavlo
    COMPLUTUM, 2024, 35 (01) : 191 - 214
  • [3] Fact-checking as a deterrent? A conceptual replication of the influence of fact-checking on the sharing of misinformation by political elites
    Ma, Siyuan
    Bergan, Daniel
    Ahn, Suhwoo
    Carnahan, Dustin
    Gimby, Nate
    McGraw, Johnny
    Virtue, Isabel
    HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2023, 49 (03) : 321 - 338
  • [4] The limits of live fact-checking: Epistemological consequences of introducing a breaking news logic to political fact-checking
    Steensen, Steen
    Kalsnes, Bente
    Westlund, Oscar
    NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2023,
  • [5] The epistemic status of reproducibility in political fact-checking
    Alejandro Fernández-Roldan
    David Teira
    European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2024, 14
  • [6] Assessing the consistency of fact-checking in political debates
    Lelo, Thales
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2023, 73 (06) : 587 - 600
  • [7] The epistemic status of reproducibility in political fact-checking
    Fernandez-Roldan, Alejandro
    Teira, David
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [8] About Fact-Checking of Online Scientific Publications
    N. G. Inshakova
    I. A. Pankeev
    Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 2022, 49 : 269 - 274
  • [9] About Fact-Checking of Online Scientific Publications
    Inshakova, N. G.
    Pankeev, I. A.
    SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2022, 49 (04) : 269 - 274
  • [10] The facts about Facebook's fact-checking
    Lu, Donna
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2019, 243 (3241) : 9 - 9