Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Xue, Mengchao [1 ]
Liu, Junjie [1 ]
Lu, Ming [1 ]
Zhang, Huiying [1 ]
Liu, Wen [1 ]
Tian, Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Dept Thorac Surg, Qilu Hosp, Jinan, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 13卷
关键词
da Vinci robot; robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy; esophageal cancer; surgery; minimally invasive esophagectomy; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; CANCER STATISTICS; OUTCOMES; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1293645
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Esophagectomy is the gold standard treatment for resectable esophageal cancer; however, there is insufficient evidence to indicate potential advantages over standard minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in treating thoracic esophageal cancer. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) bridges the gap between open and minimally invasive surgery. In this single-center retrospective review, we compare the clinical outcomes of EC patients treated with MIE and RAMIE. Method: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent surgery at Qilu Hospital between August 2020 and August 2022, including 159 patients who underwent MIE and 35 patients who received RAMIE. The intraoperative, postoperative, and preoperative patient characteristics in both groups were evaluated. Results: Except for height, the MIE and RAMIE groups showed no significant differences in preoperative features (P>0.05). Further, there were no significant differences in intraoperative indices, including TNM stage of the resected tumor, tumor tissue type, or ASA score, between the two groups. However, statistically significant differences were found in some factors; the RAMIE group had a shorter operative time, less intraoperative bleeding, and more lymph nodes removed compared to the MIE group. Patients in the RAMIE group reported less discomfort and greater chest drainage on the first postoperative day than patients in the MIE group; however, there were no differences in other features between the two datasets. Conclusion: By comparing the clinical characteristics and outcomes of RAMIE with MIE, this study verified the feasibility and safety of RAMIE for esophageal cancer. Overall, RAMIE resulted in more complete lymph node clearance, shorter operating time, reduced surgical hemorrhage, reduced postoperative discomfort, and chest drainage alleviation in patients. To investigate the function of RAMIE in esophageal cancer, we propose undertaking a future clinical trial with long-term follow-up to analyze tumor clearance, recurrence, and survival after RAMIE.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
    Till, Brian M.
    Grenda, Tyler R.
    Okusanya, Olugbenga T.
    Evans III, Nathaniel R.
    [J]. THORACIC SURGERY CLINICS, 2023, 33 (01) : 81 - 88
  • [2] Robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy
    Horgan, S
    Berger, RA
    Elli, EF
    Espat, NJ
    [J]. AMERICAN SURGEON, 2003, 69 (07) : 624 - 626
  • [3] Safety and efficacy of robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Moudgill, Neil
    Sharma, Priya
    Rosato, Ernest
    Chojnacki, Karen
    Weksler, Benny
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2010, 211 (03) : S39 - S39
  • [4] Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Weksler, B.
    Sharma, P.
    Moudgill, N.
    Chojnacki, K. A.
    Rosato, E. L.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2012, 25 (05) : 403 - 409
  • [5] Open Versus Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: What is the Best Approach? Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
    Shah, Rachit
    Jobe, Blair A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2011, 15 (09) : 1503 - 1505
  • [6] Open Versus Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: What is the Best Approach? Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
    Rachit Shah
    Blair A. Jobe
    [J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2011, 15
  • [7] Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy A Review
    Murthy, Raghav A.
    Clarke, Nicholas S.
    Kernstine, Kemp H., Sr.
    [J]. INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 13 (06) : 391 - 403
  • [8] Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: is it advantageous over thoracoscopic esophagectomy?
    Lin, Mong-Wei
    Lee, Jang-Ming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 (03) : 490 - 491
  • [9] Comparative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy
    Meredith, K.
    Huston, J.
    Briceno, P.
    Hoffe, S.
    Almhanna, K.
    Shridhar, R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 : S179 - S180
  • [10] Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy
    Meredith, Kenneth
    Blinn, Paige
    Maramara, Taylor
    Takahashi, Caitlin
    Huston, Jamie
    Shridhar, Ravi
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (02): : 814 - 820