Evaluation of the Fracture Resistance of Conservative and Ultraconservative Access Cavity Designs with Different Treatment Modalities: An In Vitro Study

被引:1
|
作者
Shirani, Farzaneh [1 ]
Saatchi, Masoud [2 ]
Shirani, Mehrangiz [3 ]
Jafari, Niloufar [4 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Dent Res Ctr, Sch Dent, Dent Res Inst,Dept Restorat Dent, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Dent Res Ctr, Sch Dent, Dent Res Inst,Dept Endodont, Esfahan, Iran
[3] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Esfahan, Iran
[4] Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Rafsanjan, Iran
关键词
ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH; INSTRUMENTATION EFFICACY; RESTORATION; PREMOLARS; STRENGTH; BEHAVIOR; POST; MOLARS;
D O I
10.1155/2023/7247375
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Introduction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular molars using traditional and conservative access cavity preparation. Materials and Methods. In this in vitro study, 100 extracted healthy human mandibular molars were selected and divided into 10 groups (n = 10). Healthy teeth in one group were considered the control group. In three groups, traditional access cavity preparation was done (groups A) without two marginal ridges (A1), with one marginal ridge (A2), and with two marginal ridges (A3). In three groups (group B), two separate access cavities with a dentinoenamel roof without two marginal ridges (B1), with one marginal ridge (B2), and with two marginal ridges (B3) were prepared. In three other groups (groups C), two separate access cavities were prepared only with a dentinal roof without two marginal ridges (C1), with one marginal ridge (C2), and with two marginal ridges (C3), on which root canal treatment was performed afterward. Then, these teeth were subjected to force until fracture. The fracture force and fracture mode of each tooth were recorded and compared between groups by ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc, and chi-square tests using SPSS ver. 23 (IBM, Somers, NJ, USA). Results. The control teeth had the highest mean fracture force (2804:5 +/- 338:5 N), followed by a conservative access cavity with a dentinoenamel roof and two marginal ridges (2360:4 +/- 181:72 N) and a conservative access cavity with a dentinoenamel roof and one marginal ridge (1812:8 +/- 263:9 N), respectively. The lowest mean fracture force was found for the conventional access cavity group without two marginal ridges (399:4 +/- 95:2 N). Conclusion. In the condition of this study, with two separate access cavities in mandibular molars and maintenance of the marginal ridges, it is possible to provide teeth with higher fracture resistance against occlusal forces.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth With Traditional Endodontic Access Cavity, Conservative Endodontic Access Cavity, Truss Endodontic Access Cavity, and Ninja Endodontic Access Cavity Designs: An In Vitro Study
    Patil, Prasad
    Newase, Pooja
    Pawar, Swapnil
    Gosai, Hasmukh
    Shah, Dharmendra
    Parhad, Sameer M.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [2] Comparative Evaluation of Different Endodontic Access Cavity Designs with Different Burs-An in vitro Experimental Insight into the Aspect of Fracture Resistance
    Langaliya, Akshayraj K.
    Parmar, Girish
    Panchal, Drashti
    Thakkar, Jainish
    Shah, Jinali
    Patel, Rushvi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : S821 - S824
  • [3] Comparative Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Conventional and Conservative Endodontic Access Cavity Designs on Pericervical Dentin Thickness and Fracture Resistance of Teeth: An In-vitro Study
    Patel, Aashray
    Parekh, Vaishali
    Joshi, Chintan
    Kinariwala, Niraj
    Thumar, Sweety
    Somani, Mona
    Khunt, Ankita
    Desai, Neelam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 17 (01) : ZC20 - ZC25
  • [4] Finite Element Analysis of Fracture Resistance of Mandibular Molars with Different Access Cavity Designs
    Rahmatian, Mohammadreza
    Jafari, Zahra
    Moghaddam, Kiumars Nazari
    Dianat, Omid
    Kazemi, Ali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2023, 49 (12) : 1690 - 1697
  • [5] Fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular first molars with conservative access cavity and different restorative techniques: An invitro study
    Al Amri, Mohammad D.
    Al-Johany, Sulieman
    Sherfudhin, Haneef
    Al Shammari, Badar
    Al Mohefer, Sami
    Al Saloum, Mohammed
    Al Qarni, Hatem
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2016, 42 (03) : 124 - 131
  • [6] Evaluation of the Fracture Resistance of Different Designs of All-Resin Post and Core Systems: An In Vitro Study
    Altassan, Mosa
    Alsulimani, Osamah
    Alzahrani, Bashayer M.
    Alghanemi, Abdulmajeed
    Abukhudhayr, Abdullah
    Alharbi, Shooq
    Munshi, Nabeel
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [7] Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Preparation Designs and Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Laminate Veneers: An In Vitro Study
    Soni, Pranjal S.
    Sanyal, Pronob
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [8] Comparison of Different Endodontic Access Cavity Designs on the Fracture Resistance of Tooth in WaveOne Gold and TruNatomy Instrumentation
    Kumar, Mukesh
    Rai, Rahul Kumar
    Shahi, Siddharth
    Singh, Anshdeep
    Aggarwal, Nidhi
    El-Shamy, Fahiem Mohammad Mohammad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : S780 - S782
  • [9] Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Different Access Cavity Designs
    Plotino, Gianluca
    Grande, Nicola Maria
    Isufi, Almira
    Ioppoio, Pietro
    Pedulla, Eugenio
    Bedini, Rossella
    Gambarini, Gianluca
    Testarelli, Luca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2017, 43 (06) : 995 - 1000
  • [10] Comparison of the Effect of Different Cavity Designs and Temporary Restoration Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Upper Premolars, Undergone Re-treatment: An In-Vitro Study
    Parnian Alavinejad
    Mohammad Yazdizadeh
    Ali Mombeinipour
    Ebrahim Karimzadeh
    [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 2024, 94 (3) : 677 - 683