Organizational Factors in Clinical Data Sharing for Artificial Intelligence in Health Care

被引:6
|
作者
Youssef, Alaa [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Ng, Madelena Y. [2 ]
Long, Jin [3 ]
Hernandez-Boussard, Tina [2 ,4 ]
Shah, Nigam [2 ,4 ]
Miner, Adam [5 ]
Larson, David [1 ]
Langlotz, Curtis P. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Biomed Informat Res, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Stanford, CA USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Stanford, CA USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Stanford Ctr Artificial Intelligence & Med Imaging, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, 1701 Page Mill Rd,Mail code 5467, Stanford, CA 94304 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48422
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Limited sharing of data sets that accurately represent disease and patient diversity limits the generalizability of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in health care.Objective To explore the factors associated with organizational motivation to share health data for AI development.Design, Setting, and Participants This qualitative study investigated organizational readiness for sharing health data across the academic, governmental, nonprofit, and private sectors. Using a multiple case studies approach, 27 semistructured interviews were conducted with leaders in data-sharing roles from August 29, 2022, to January 9, 2023. The interviews were conducted in the English language using a video conferencing platform. Using a purposive and nonprobabilistic sampling strategy, 78 individuals across 52 unique organizations were identified. Of these, 35 participants were enrolled. Participant recruitment concluded after 27 interviews, as theoretical saturation was reached and no additional themes emerged.Main Outcome and Measure Concepts defining organizational readiness for data sharing and the association between data-sharing factors and organizational behavior were mapped through iterative qualitative analysis to establish a framework defining organizational readiness for sharing clinical data for AI development.Results Interviews included 27 leaders from 18 organizations (academia: 10, government: 7, nonprofit: 8, and private: 2). Organizational readiness for data sharing centered around 2 main constructs: motivation and capabilities. Motivation related to the alignment of an organization's values with data-sharing priorities and was associated with its engagement in data-sharing efforts. However, organizational motivation could be modulated by extrinsic incentives for financial or reputational gains. Organizational capabilities comprised infrastructure, people, expertise, and access to data. Cross-sector collaboration was a key strategy to mitigate barriers to access health data.Conclusions and Relevance This qualitative study identified sector-specific factors that may affect the data-sharing behaviors of health organizations. External incentives may bolster cross-sector collaborations by helping overcome barriers to accessing health data for AI development. The findings suggest that tailored incentives may boost organizational motivation and facilitate sustainable flow of health data for AI development.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial intelligence and knowledge sharing: Contributing factors to organizational performance
    Olan, Femi
    Arakpogun, Emmanuel Ogiemwonyi
    Suklan, Jana
    Nakpodia, Franklin
    Damij, Nadja
    Jayawickrama, Uchitha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 145 : 605 - 615
  • [2] Patient Perceptions on Data Sharing and Applying Artificial Intelligence to Health Care Data: Cross-sectional Survey
    Aggarwal, Ravi
    Farag, Soma
    Martin, Guy
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    Darzi, Ara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (08)
  • [3] The Role of the Sharing Economy and Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Opportunities and Challenges
    Wu, Huailiang
    Chan, Nga-Kwo
    Zhang, Casper J. P.
    Ming, Wai-Kit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (10)
  • [4] Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Health Care Applications: Viewpoint
    van Hartskamp, Michael
    Consoli, Sergio
    Verhaegh, Wim
    Petkovic, Milan
    van de Stolpe, Anja
    [J]. INTERACTIVE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (02):
  • [5] Artificial Intelligence Capability and Organizational Creativity: The Role of Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Cohesion
    Li, Na
    Yan, Yapeng
    Yang, Yuting
    Gu, Anwei
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [6] Artificial intelligence in health care: data protection concerns in Malaysia
    Dhali, Mohsin
    Hassan, Shafiqul
    Zulhuda, Sonny
    Bt Ismail, Suzi Fadhilah
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL DATA PRIVACY LAW, 2022, 12 (02) : 143 - 161
  • [7] Learning from Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Health Care
    Ricco, Jean-B.
    Guetarni, Farid
    Kolh, Philippe
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 59 (06) : 868 - 869
  • [8] Data Pulse: A Brief Tour of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care
    Manson, Lesley
    [J]. FAMILIES SYSTEMS & HEALTH, 2021, 39 (01) : 153 - 154
  • [9] Artificial intelligence in health care
    Isaacs, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2020, 56 (10) : 1493 - 1495
  • [10] Practical guidance on artificial intelligence for health-care data
    Ghassemi, Marzyeh
    Naumann, Tristan
    Schulam, Peter
    Beam, Andrew L.
    Chen, Irene Y.
    Ranganath, Rajesh
    [J]. LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2019, 1 (04): : E157 - E159