Presumptive Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Based on Neuroimaging Findings: A Referral Pattern Study

Background:Radiologic findings of intracranial hypertension (RAD-IH) are common in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) patients. Paralleling the increasing rates of obesity, the burden of IIH is growing. Urgent neuro-ophthalmology consultations for possible IIH in patients with incidentally detected RAD-IH are increasing, with many patients receiving unnecessary lumbar punctures (LPs) and treatments. This retrospective observational study aimed to determine the prevalence of neuro-ophthalmology consultations for RAD-IH, rate of funduscopic examination by referring providers, prevalence of papilledema, outcomes after neuro-ophthalmic evaluation, and rates of misdiagnosis.Methods:Records of 1,262 consecutive new patients seen in one neuro-ophthalmology clinic from January 2019 to January 2020 were reviewed. We identified patients who were: 1) referred with concern for IIH because of findings of RAD-IH; 2) referred for "papilledema"; 3) referred with a diagnosis of IIH; and 4) referred for spontaneous cranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. In addition to basic demographic profiles for all groups, detailed information was collected for patients referred solely for RAD-IH, including referral patterns, prior history of IIH, previous LPs, prior medical or surgical treatment(s), risk factors for increased intracranial pressure (ICP), presenting symptoms, radiologic features observed on neuroimaging, and final disposition. When available, the neuroimaging was reviewed by an expert neuroradiologist.Results:Of 1,262 consecutive new patients, 66 (5%) were referred specifically for RAD-IH; most referrals came from neurologists (58%); 8/66 (12%) patients had papilledema; 16/66 (24%) patients had prior LP and 13/66 (20%) were already treated based on MRI findings; and 22/66 (33%) patients had <= 2 RAD-IH. Only 34/66 (52%) of patients referred for RAD-IH had prior funduscopic examinations. We confirmed papilledema in 26/82 (32%) patients referred for "papilledema." Only 29/83 (35%) patients referred with a diagnosis of IIH had active papilledema, and 3/16 (19%) patients with spontaneous CSF leaks had papilledema. In total, 247/1,262 (20%) new patients were referred to our clinic over 1 year with concern for IIH, among whom only 66 (27%) were confirmed to have active IIH with papilledema.Conclusions:One in 5 new patient referrals seen in our neuro-ophthalmology clinic were referred because of concern for increased ICP, but only 1/4 had active papilledema. Most patients referred for isolated RAD-IH do not have papilledema, many having undergone unnecessary LPs and treatments. The burden of these "rule-out IIH" consultations is overwhelming and will only continue to increase with the concurrent rise of obesity and IIH, straining the already limited neuro-ophthalmologic resources available in the US.