Informing Methane Emissions Inventories Using Facility Aerial Measurements at Midstream Natural Gas Facilities

被引:4
|
作者
Brown, Jenna A. [1 ]
Harrison, Matthew R. [2 ]
Rufael, Tecle [2 ]
Roman-White, Selina A. [3 ]
Ross, Gregory B. [3 ]
George, Fiji C. [3 ]
Zimmerle, Daniel [4 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80524 USA
[2] SLR Int Corp, Houston, TX 77036 USA
[3] Cheniere Energy Inc, Houston, TX 77002 USA
[4] Colorado State Univ, Energy Inst, Ft Collins, CO 80524 USA
关键词
methane emissions; oil and gas; aerial measurements; measurement-informedinventories; bottom-up inventories; emission inventories; top-down measurements; OIL;
D O I
10.1021/acs.est.3c01321
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Increased interest in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including recent legislative action and voluntary programs, has increased attention on quantifying and ultimately reducing methane emissions from the natural gas supply chain. While inventories used for public or corporate GHG policies have traditionally utilized bottom-up (BU) methods to estimate emissions, the validity of such inventories has been questioned. Therefore, there is attention on utilizing full-facility measurements using airborne, satellite, or drone (top-down (TD)) techniques to inform, improve, or validate inventories. This study utilized full-facility estimates from two independent TD methods at 15 midstream natural gas facilities in the U.S.A., which were compared with a contemporaneous daily inventory assembled by the facility operator, employing comprehensive inventory methods. Estimates from the two TD methods statistically agreed in 2 of 28 paired measurements. Operator inventories, which included extensions to capture sources beyond regular inventory requirements and integration of local measurements, estimated significantly lower emissions than the TD estimates for 40 of 43 paired comparisons. Significant disagreement was observed at most facilities, both between the two TD methods and between the TD estimates and operator inventory. These findings have two implications. First, improving inventory estimates will require additional on-site or ground-based diagnostic screening and measurement of all sources. Second, the TD full-facility measurement methods need to undergo further testing, characterization, and potential improvement specifically tailored for complex midstream facilities.
引用
收藏
页码:14539 / 14547
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Natural gas facility methane emissions: measurements by tracer flux ratio in two US natural gas producing basins
    Yacovitch, Tara I.
    Daube, Conner
    Vaughn, Timothy L.
    Bell, Clay S.
    Roscioli, Joseph R.
    Knighton, W. Berk
    Nelson, David D.
    Zimmerle, Daniel
    Petron, Gabrielle
    Herndon, Scott C.
    [J]. ELEMENTA-SCIENCE OF THE ANTHROPOCENE, 2017, 5
  • [2] Measurements of Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Gathering Facilities and Processing Plants: Measurement Results
    Mitchell, Austin L.
    Tkacik, Daniel S.
    Roscioli, Joseph R.
    Herndon, Scott C.
    Yacovitch, Tara I.
    Martinez, David M.
    Vaughn, Timothy L.
    Williams, Laurie L.
    Sullivan, Melissa R.
    Floerchinger, Cody
    Omara, Mark
    Subramanian, R.
    Zimmerle, Daniel
    Marchese, Anthony J.
    Robinson, Allen L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (05) : 3219 - 3227
  • [3] Measurements of methane emissions from natural gas gathering facilities and processing plants: measurement methods
    Roscioli, J. R.
    Yacovitch, T. I.
    Floerchinger, C.
    Mitchell, A. L.
    Tkacik, D. S.
    Subramanian, R.
    Martinez, D. M.
    Vaughn, T. L.
    Williams, L.
    Zimmerle, D.
    Robinson, A. L.
    Herndon, S. C.
    Marchese, A. J.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2015, 8 (05) : 2017 - 2035
  • [4] Closing the methane gap in US oil and natural gas production emissions inventories
    Jeffrey S. Rutherford
    Evan D. Sherwin
    Arvind P. Ravikumar
    Garvin A. Heath
    Jacob Englander
    Daniel Cooley
    David Lyon
    Mark Omara
    Quinn Langfitt
    Adam R. Brandt
    [J]. Nature Communications, 12
  • [5] Closing the methane gap in US oil and natural gas production emissions inventories
    Rutherford, Jeffrey S.
    Sherwin, Evan D.
    Ravikumar, Arvind P.
    Heath, Garvin A.
    Englander, Jacob
    Cooley, Daniel
    Lyon, David
    Omara, Mark
    Langfitt, Quinn
    Brandt, Adam R.
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [6] Methane emissions measurements of natural gas components using a utility terrain vehicle and portable methane quantification system
    Johnson, Derek
    Heltzel, Robert
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 144 : 1 - 7
  • [7] Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories
    Neininger, Bruno G.
    Kelly, Bryce F. J.
    Hacker, Jorg M.
    Lu, Xinyi
    Schwietzke, Stefan
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2021, 379 (2210):
  • [8] Multiscale Methane Measurements at Oil and Gas Facilities Reveal Necessary Frameworks for Improved Emissions Accounting
    Wang, Jiayang Lyra
    Daniels, William S.
    Hammerling, Dorit M.
    Harrison, Matthew
    Burmaster, Kaylyn
    George, Fiji C.
    Ravikumar, Arvind P.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 56 (20) : 14743 - 14752
  • [9] Methane Emissions from Leak and Loss Audits of Natural Gas Compressor Stations and Storage Facilities
    Johnson, Derek R.
    Covington, April N.
    Clark, Nigel N.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (13) : 8132 - 8138
  • [10] Measurements of Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Gathering Facilities and Processing Plants: Measurement Results (vol 49, pg 3219, 2015)
    Mitchell, Austin L.
    Tkacik, Daniel S.
    Roscioli, Joseph R.
    Herndon, Scott C.
    Yacovitch, Tara I.
    Martinez, David M.
    Vaughn, Timothy L.
    Williams, Laurie
    Sullivan, Melissa
    Floerchinger, Cody
    Omara, Mark
    Subramanian, R.
    Zimmerle, Dan
    Marchese, Anthony J.
    Robinson, Allen L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (20) : 12602 - 12602