Multisectoral interventions for urban health in Africa: a mixed-methods systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Thondoo, Meelan [1 ,2 ,12 ]
Mogo, Ebele R. I. [1 ,2 ]
Tatah, Lambed [1 ]
Muti, Monica [3 ]
van Daalen, Kim R. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Muzenda, Trish [1 ]
Boscott, Rachel [1 ]
Uwais, Omar [1 ]
Farmer, George [1 ]
Yue, Adelaide [1 ]
Dalzell, Sarah [1 ]
Mukoma, Gudani [3 ,7 ]
Bhagtani, Divya [1 ]
Matina, Sostina [3 ]
Dambisya, Philip M. [8 ,9 ]
Okop, Kufre [10 ]
Ebikeme, Charles [11 ]
Micklesfield, Lisa [3 ]
Oni, Tolu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, MRC Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge, England
[2] Barcelona Inst Global Hlth ISGlobal, Ctr Res Environm Epidemiol CREAL, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Witwatersrand, Dept Paediat, Sch Clin Med, SA MRC Wits Dev Pathways Hlth Res Unit,Fac Hlth Sc, Johannesburg, South Africa
[4] Univ Cambridge, British Heart Fdn Cardiovasc Epidemiol Unit, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England
[5] Univ Cambridge, Victor Phillip Dahdaleh Heart & Lung Res Inst, Cambridge, England
[6] Barcelona Supercomp Ctr BSC, Dept Earth Sci, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Univ Venda, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Biokinet Recreat & Sport Sci, Thohoyandou, South Africa
[8] Univ Cape Town, Sch Publ Hlth & Family Med, Hlth Policy & Syst Div, Cape Town, South Africa
[9] Univ Cape Town, Ctr Innovat Learning & Teaching, Cape Town, South Africa
[10] Univ Cape Town, Dept Med, Chron Dis Initiat Africa CDIA, Cape Town, South Africa
[11] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Hlth Policy, LSE Hlth, London, England
[12] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, MRC Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
关键词
Urban health; multisectoral action; Africa; cities; non-communicable diseases; COMMUNITY NUTRITION PROJECT; SOUTH-AFRICA; CAPE-TOWN; HYPERTENSION; POLICY; FOOD; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; PROGRAM; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1080/16549716.2024.2325726
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Increasing evidence suggests that urban health objectives are best achieved through a multisectoral approach. This approach requires multiple sectors to consider health and well-being as a central aspect of their policy development and implementation, recognising that numerous determinants of health lie outside (or beyond the confines of) the health sector. However, collaboration across sectors remains scarce and multisectoral interventions to support health are lacking in Africa. To address this gap in research, we conducted a mixed-method systematic review of multisectoral interventions aimed at enhancing health, with a particular focus on non-communicable diseases in urban African settings. Africa is the world's fastest urbanising region, making it a critical context in which to examine the impact of multisectoral approaches to improve health. This systematic review provides a valuable overview of current knowledge on multisectoral urban health interventions and enables the identification of existing knowledge gaps, and consequently, avenues for future research. We searched four academic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Global Health) for evidence dated 1989-2019 and identified grey literature from expert input. We identified 53 articles (17 quantitative, 20 qualitative, 12 mixed methods) involving collaborations across 22 sectors and 16 African countries. The principle guiding the majority of the multisectoral interventions was community health equity (39.6%), followed by healthy cities and healthy urban governance principles (32.1%). Targeted health outcomes were diverse, spanning behaviour, environmental and active participation from communities. With only 2% of all studies focusing on health equity as an outcome and with 47% of studies published by first authors located outside Africa, this review underlines the need for future research to prioritise equity both in terms of research outcomes and processes. A synthesised framework of seven interconnected components showcases an ecosystem on multisectoral interventions for urban health that can be examined in the future research in African urban settings that can benefit the health of people and the planet.Paper ContextMain findings: Multisectoral interventions were identified in 27.8% of African countries in the African Union, targeted at major cities with five sectors present at all intervention stages: academia or research, agriculture, government, health, and non-governmental.Added knowledge: We propose a synthesised framework showcasing an ecosystem on multisectoral interventions for urban health that can guide future research in African urban settings.Global health impact for policy and action: This study reveals a crucial gap in evidence on evaluating the long-term impact of multisectoral interventions and calls for partnerships involving various sectors and robust community engagement to effectively deliver and sustain health-promoting policies and actions.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A mixed-methods systematic review of suicide prevention interventions involving multisectoral collaborations
    Tania Pearce
    Myfanwy Maple
    Sarah Wayland
    Kathy McKay
    Alan Woodward
    Anna Brooks
    Anthony Shakeshaft
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 20
  • [2] A mixed-methods systematic review of suicide prevention interventions involving multisectoral collaborations
    Pearce, Tania
    Maple, Myfanwy
    Wayland, Sarah
    McKay, Kathy
    Woodward, Alan
    Brooks, Anna
    Shakeshaft, Anthony
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [3] Asynchronous digital health interventions for reviewing asthma: A mixed-methods systematic review protocol
    Uzzaman, Md Nazim
    Hammersley, Vicky
    McClatchey, Kirstie
    Sheringham, Jessica
    Habib, G. M. Monsur
    Pinnock, Hilary
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (02):
  • [4] Asynchronous digital health interventions (aDHI) for reviewing asthma: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Uzzaman, Nazim
    Hammersley, Vicky
    Mcclatchey, Kirstie
    Sheringham, Jessica
    Habib, Monsur
    Pinnock, Hilary
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2023, 62
  • [5] Asynchronous digital health interventions (aDHI) for reviewing asthma: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Uzzaman, Nazim
    Hammersley, Vicky
    McClatchey, Kirstie
    Sheringham, Jessica
    Habib, Monsur
    Pinnock, Hilary
    [J]. RESPIROLOGY, 2023, 28 : 100 - 101
  • [6] A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Interventions to Address Incivility in Nursing
    Olsen, Jeanette M.
    Aschenbrenner, Ann
    Merkel, Rachel
    Pehler, Shelley-Rae
    Sargent, Linda
    Sperstad, Rita
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2020, 59 (06) : 319 - +
  • [7] Telehealth and mobile health interventions in adults with inflammatory bowel disease: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Davis, Suja P.
    Ross, Megan Suzanne Hardin
    Adatorwovor, Reuben
    Wei, Holly
    [J]. RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2021, 44 (01) : 155 - 172
  • [8] Interventions to prevent elder abuse in the community: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Regis de Sousa, Rute Costa
    Nascimento de Araujo-Monteiro, Gleicy Karine
    Souto, Rafaella Queiroga
    dos Santos, Renata Clemente
    Amado Monteiro Leal, Claudia Quezia
    Nascimento, Neyce de Matos
    [J]. REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2021, 55 : 1 - 11
  • [9] Impact of dance interventions on the symptoms of dementia: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Manji, Irfan
    Wells, Sarah
    Dal Bello-Haas, Vanina
    Fallavollita, Pascal
    [J]. ARTS & HEALTH, 2024, 16 (01) : 64 - 88
  • [10] Health supplements for allergic rhinitis: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Pellow, Janice
    Nolte, Anna
    Temane, Annie
    Solomon, Elizabeth M.
    [J]. COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2020, 51