Medical optimization of osteoporosis for adult spinal deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art evidence-based review of current pharmacotherapy

被引:10
|
作者
Zhang, Andrew S. [1 ,3 ]
Khatri, Surya [2 ]
Balmaceno-Criss, Mariah [2 ]
Alsoof, Daniel [3 ]
Daniels, Alan H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Shreveport, LA 71105 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
Adult spinal deformity; Spine surgery; Osteoporosis; Optimization; Outcomes; Fusion; Hardware; Complications; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; VERTEBRAL FRACTURE RISK; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; PARATHYROID-HORMONE; ZOLEDRONIC ACID; DOUBLE-BLIND; ALENDRONATE TREATMENT; TURNOVER MARKERS; TERIPARATIDE;
D O I
10.1007/s43390-022-00621-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Osteoporosis is a common, but challenging phenomenon to overcome in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Several pharmacological agents are at the surgeon's disposal to optimize the osteoporotic patient prior to undergoing extensive reconstruction. Familiarity with these medications will allow the surgeon to make informed decisions on selecting the most appropriate adjuncts for each individual patient. Methods A comprehensive literature review was conducted in PubMed from September 2021 to April 2022. Studies were selected that contained combinations of various terms including osteoporosis, specific medications, spine surgery, fusion, cage subsidence, screw loosening, pull-out, junctional kyphosis/failure. Results Bisphosphonates, denosumab, selective estrogen receptor modulators, teriparatide, abaloparatide and romosozumab are all pharmacological agents currently available for adjunctive use. While these medications have been shown to have beneficial effects on improving bone mineral density in the osteoporotic patient, varying evidence is available on their specific effects in the context of extensive spine surgery. There is still a lack of human studies with use of the newer agents. Conclusion Bisphosphonates are first-line agents due to their low cost and robust evidence behind their utility. However, in the absence of contraindications, optimizing bone quality with anabolic medications should be strongly considered in preparation for spinal deformity surgeries due to their beneficial and favorable effects on fusion and hardware compared to the anti-resorptive medications.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 596
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Medical optimization of osteoporosis for adult spinal deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art evidence-based review of current pharmacotherapy
    Andrew S. Zhang
    Surya Khatri
    Mariah Balmaceno-Criss
    Daniel Alsoof
    Alan H. Daniels
    [J]. Spine Deformity, 2023, 11 : 579 - 596
  • [2] Correction: Medical optimization of osteoporosis for adult spinal deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art evidence-based review of current pharmacotherapy
    Andrew S. Zhang
    Surya Khatri
    Mariah Balmaceno-Criss
    Daniel Alsoof
    Alan H. Daniels
    [J]. Spine Deformity, 2023, 11 : 523 - 523
  • [3] Medical optimization of osteoporosis for adult spinal deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art evidence-based review of current pharmacotherapy (Dec, 10.1007/s43390-022-00621-6, 2022)
    Zhang, Andrew S.
    Khatri, Surya
    Balmaceno-Criss, Mariah
    Alsoof, Daniel
    Daniels, Alan H.
    [J]. SPINE DEFORMITY, 2023, 11 (02) : 523 - 523
  • [4] Preoperative medical assessment for adult spinal deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art review
    Arora, Ayush
    Cummins, Daniel D.
    Wague, Aboubacar
    Mendelis, Joseph
    Samtani, Rahul
    McNeill, Ian
    Theologis, Alekos A.
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Berven, Sigurd
    [J]. SPINE DEFORMITY, 2023, 11 (04) : 773 - 785
  • [5] Preoperative medical assessment for adult spinal deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art review
    Ayush Arora
    Daniel D. Cummins
    Aboubacar Wague
    Joseph Mendelis
    Rahul Samtani
    Ian McNeill
    Alekos A. Theologis
    Praveen V. Mummaneni
    Sigurd Berven
    [J]. Spine Deformity, 2023, 11 : 773 - 785
  • [6] State-of-the-art: outcome assessment in adult spinal deformity
    Jeffrey L. Gum
    Leah Y. Carreon
    Steven D. Glassman
    [J]. Spine Deformity, 2021, 9 : 1 - 11
  • [7] State-of-the-art: outcome assessment in adult spinal deformity
    Gum, Jeffrey L.
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    Glassman, Steven D.
    [J]. SPINE DEFORMITY, 2021, 9 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [8] Adult cervical spine deformity: a state-of-the-art review
    Brendan Jackson-Fowl
    Aaron Hockley
    Sara Naessig
    Waleed Ahmad
    Katherine Pierce
    Justin S. Smith
    Christopher Ames
    Christopher Shaffrey
    Claudia Bennett-Caso
    Tyler K. Williamson
    Kimberly McFarland
    Peter G. Passias
    [J]. Spine Deformity, 2024, 12 : 3 - 23
  • [9] Adult cervical spine deformity: a state-of-the-art review
    Jackson-Fowl, Brendan
    Hockley, Aaron
    Naessig, Sara
    Ahmad, Waleed
    Pierce, Katherine
    Smith, Justin S.
    Ames, Christopher
    Shaffrey, Christopher
    Bennett-Caso, Claudia
    Williamson, Tyler K.
    Mcfarland, Kimberly
    Passias, Peter G.
    [J]. SPINE DEFORMITY, 2024, 12 (01) : 3 - 23
  • [10] Self-image in spinal deformity: a state-of-the-art review
    Stone, Lauren E.
    Sindewald, Ryan
    Kelly, Michael P.
    [J]. SPINE DEFORMITY, 2024, 12 (05) : 1179 - 1202