Shepherding parents to prepare for end-of-life decision-making: a critical phenomenological study of the communication approach of paediatricians caring for children with life-limiting conditions in Australia

被引:2
|
作者
Vemuri, Sidharth [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hynson, Jenny [1 ,2 ]
Williams, Katrina [3 ,4 ]
O'Neill, Jenny [5 ]
Gillam, Lynn [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Royal Childrens Hosp Melbourne, Victorian Paediat Palliat Care Program, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Neurodisabil & Rehabil, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Paediat, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[5] Royal Childrens Hosp Melbourne, Childrens Bioeth Ctr, Parkville, Vic, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 12期
关键词
PAEDIATRICS; PALLIATIVE CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; PALLIATIVE CARE; SIMULATION; CANCER; CONVERSATIONS; EXPERIENCES; DOCTOR; NEEDS; HOPE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075740
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/objectivesShared decision-making is widely accepted as the best approach for end-of-life decision-making for children with life-limiting conditions. Both paediatricians and parents find benefit in preparing for such decisions. However, little detail is known about this preparatory process. This study aims to explore how paediatricians prepare parents for end-of-life decision-making for a child with a life-limiting condition using clinical simulation.DesignIndividual, semistructured, post-simulation qualitative interviews of paediatricians and parent-actors.SettingAcute intensive and long-term outpatient paediatric care in Victoria, Australia.Participants18 purposively sampled paediatricians who treat children with life-limiting conditions and the two parent-actors involved in all simulations. Paediatricians were excluded if they assisted in the study design, worked within specialist palliative care teams or did not provide clinical care outside the neonatal period.ResultsThree key themes in a preparatory process (termed 'shepherding') were identified: (1) paediatricians aim to lead parents along a pathway to future end-of-life decisions, (2) paediatricians prefer to control the pace of these discussions and (3) paediatricians recognise they need to have courage to face risk with this preparation. Paediatricians use a variety of shepherding strategies to influence the pace, content and framing of discussions, which may help prepare parents to make the best end-of-life treatment decisions when the time comes.ConclusionsShepherding is a newly identified, subtle process intended to influence parents by guiding their understanding of their child's health and potential suffering in advance of decision-making. Shepherding does not fit within current descriptions of physicians' decision-making influence. Paced reflection, thinking and provision of information are shepherding strategies preferred by paediatricians, and these appear the same regardless of whether paediatricians intend to steer parents towards particular treatment decisions or simply prepare them for the process of decision-making. Further study about the intention of this influence and parental perception of this communication is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conceptualising paediatric advance care planning: a qualitative phenomenological study of paediatricians caring for children with life-limiting conditions in Australia
    Vemuri, Sidharth
    Hynson, Jenny
    Williams, Katrina
    Gillam, Lynn
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05): : e060077
  • [2] Decision-making approaches for children with life-limiting conditions: results from a qualitative phenomenological study
    Sidharth Vemuri
    Jenny Hynson
    Katrina Williams
    Lynn Gillam
    [J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 23
  • [3] Decision-making approaches for children with life-limiting conditions: results from a qualitative phenomenological study
    Vemuri, Sidharth
    Hynson, Jenny
    Williams, Katrina
    Gillam, Lynn
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [4] Navigating two 'truths': a qualitative study of physician-led end-of-life decision-making for children with life-limiting conditions
    Vemuri, Sidharth
    Hynson, Jenny
    Williams, Katrina
    Gillam, Lynn
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2023, 108 (09) : 725 - 729
  • [5] Communication Strategies in Shared Decision Making for Children With Life-Limiting Conditions
    Okhuysen-Cawley, Regina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2022, 64 (01) : 84 - 84
  • [6] A qualitative phenomenological study of nurses' experiences in caring for infants and children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions
    Bassola, Barbara
    Cilluffo, Silvia
    Ongari, Eleonora
    Terzoni, Stefano
    Targa, Alessia
    Destrebecq, Anne
    Lusignani, Maura
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2023, 71 : e148 - e153
  • [7] Communication strategies and persuasion as core components of shared decision-making for children with life-limiting conditions: A multiple case study
    Popejoy, Emma
    Almack, Kathryn
    Manning, Joseph C.
    Johnston, Bridget
    Pollock, Kristian
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 36 (03) : 519 - 528
  • [8] Parental experiences of end of life care decision-making for children with life-limiting conditions in the paediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative interview study
    Mitchell, Sarah
    Spry, Jenna L.
    Hill, Emma
    Coad, Jane
    Dale, Jeremy
    Plunkett, Adrian
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [9] What parents want from doctors in end-of-life decision-making for children
    Sullivan, J.
    Monagle, P.
    Gillam, L.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2014, 99 (03) : 216 - 220
  • [10] Enhancing Patient-Professional Communication About End-of-Life Issues in Life-Limiting Conditions: A Critical Review of the Literature
    Barnes, Sarah
    Gardiner, Clare
    Gott, Merryn
    Payne, Sheila
    Chady, Becky
    Small, Neil
    Seamark, David
    Halpin, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2012, 44 (06) : 866 - 879