Color stability in a giomer, a conventional glass ionomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer exposed to different pigment beverages: An in vitro comparative study

被引:2
|
作者
Alacote-Mauricio, Brian [1 ]
Gihuana-Aguilar, Cindy [1 ]
Castro-Ramirez, Leonor [1 ]
Cervantes-Ganoza, Luis [3 ]
Ladera-Castaneda, Marysela [2 ]
Dapello-Zevallos, Giannina [1 ]
Cayo-Rojas, Cesar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Privada San Juan Bautista, Sch Stomatol, Jose Antonio Lavalle Ave 302-304 Ex Hacienda Villa, Lima, Peru
[2] Univ Nacl Federico Villarreal, Fac Dent & Postgrad Sch, Res Team Salud Publ Salud Integral, Lima, Peru
[3] Univ Inca Garcilaso de la Vega, Fac Stomatol, Lima, Peru
来源
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ORAL HEALTH | 2023年 / 15卷 / 04期
关键词
Color variation; comparative study; dental materials; dentistry; giomer; ionomer; COMPOSITE RESINS; MICROHARDNESS; ROUGHNESS;
D O I
10.4103/jioh.jioh_93_23
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim: Discoloration in ionomeric materials occurs by absorption of substances, so color stability is important because these materials are of choice to restore class V. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the color stability of a giomer, a conventional glass ionomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer exposed to different beverages with different immersion times. Materials and Methods: This in vitro experimental and longitudinal study had 135 discs were sampled in total (2 mm thick x 8 mm in diameter) distributed in three equal groups (n = 45): Beautifil II, Vitremer, and Ketac Universal. Each group was divided into three equal subgroups (n = 15 each group) and immersed in three different staining solutions: coffee, Coca-Cola (R), and red wine. Color change was recorded with the Vita Easyshade (R) spectrophotometer after 1 h, 24 h, and 1 week of immersion. Measures of central tendency and dispersion were calculated. Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman nonparametric H tests were used to compare independent measures. The Bonferroni post hoc was used considering a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: Beautifil II (P <0.05) and Ketac Universal (P < 0.05) showed significant differences with respect to color variation (Delta E) when comparing exposure to Coca-Cola (R) versus exposure to coffee and red wine for 1 h, 24 h, and 1 week. Vitremer showed no significant differences when exposed to Coca-Cola (R), coffee, and red wine for 1 h, 24 h, and 1 week (P = 0.607, P = 0.276, and P = 0.134, sequentially). All three restorative materials, after 1 hour immersed in Coca-Cola (R), showed Delta E < 3.3 and Beautifil II obtained Delta E = 3.12 after 24 h immersed in the same beverage. Conclusion: Coffee and red wine significantly varied the color of Beautifil II and Ketac Universal over time. Beautifil II and Ketac Universal showed significantly more pigmentation with red wine and less with Coca-Cola (R) at 1 week immersion. Vitremer showed no significant differences when exposed to Coca-Cola (R), coffee, and red wine at all times tested. There were clinically acceptable variations for all three restorative materials immersed in Coca-Cola for 1 h. This clinical threshold was only maintained for the Beautifil II giomer up to 24 h of immersion in the same beverage.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 366
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Color stability of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement
    Yap, AUJ
    Sim, CPC
    Loganathan, V
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2001, 26 (06) : 591 - 596
  • [2] Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?: an in vitro evaluation
    Millett, DT
    Cummings, A
    Letters, S
    Roger, E
    Love, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2003, 25 (06) : 609 - 614
  • [3] An In Vitro Biocompatibility Study of Conventional and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cements
    Rodriguez, Ismael A.
    Rozas Ferrara, Carlos A.
    Campos-Sanchez, Fernando
    Alaminos, Miguel
    Uribe Echevarria, Jorge
    Campos, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2013, 15 (06): : 541 - 546
  • [4] Biocompatibility of a Conventional Glass Ionomer, Ceramic Reinforced Glass Ionomer, Giomer and Resin Composite to Fibroblasts: In vitro Study
    Tamilselvam, S.
    Divyanand, M. J.
    Neelakantan, P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2013, 37 (04) : 403 - 406
  • [5] Comparative evaluation of microleakage in Class V cavities restored with giomer, resin-modified glass ionomer, zirconomer and nano-ionomer: An In vitro study
    Salman, K. Mohammed
    Naik, Savitha B.
    Kumar, N. Kiran
    Merwade, Seema
    Brigit, Biji
    Jalan, Reshu
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL DENTAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION, 2019, 11 (01) : 20 - 25
  • [6] Caries inhibition by a resin-modified and a conventional glass ionomer cement, in vitro
    Dunne, SM
    Goolnik, JS
    Millar, BJ
    Seddon, RP
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1996, 24 (1-2) : 91 - 94
  • [7] Orthodontic band retention using microetching and resin-modified glass ionomer and conventional glass ionomer cements.
    Paras, T
    Dhuru, V
    Ferguson, D
    Gannon, M
    Niland, P
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 : 28 - 28
  • [8] Solubility of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement
    Quackenbush, BM
    Donly, KJ
    Croll, TP
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN, 1998, 65 (05): : 310 - +
  • [9] Cytotoxicity of resin-modified glass ionomer cements
    Chen, RCS
    Chiou, LR
    Chen, KH
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 812 - 812
  • [10] In situ anticariogenic potential of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cement
    Tabchoury, CPM
    Dalcico, R
    Del Cury, AAB
    Rosalen, PL
    Cury, JA
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A32 - A32