Mixed-mode surveys reveal shared regulatory preferences in an overfished recreational fishery

被引:0
|
作者
Smith, David R. [1 ]
Midway, Stephen R. [1 ,5 ]
Adriance, Jason W. [2 ]
Blanchet, Harry R. [3 ]
Caffey, Rex H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Oceanog & Coastal Sci, Baton Rouge, LA USA
[2] Louisiana Dept Wildlife & Fisheries, Off Fisheries, New Orleans, LA USA
[3] Louisiana Dept Wildlife & Fisheries, Off Fisheries, Baton Rouge, LA USA
[4] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness, Baton Rouge, LA USA
[5] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Oceanog & Coastal Sci, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
Harvest regulations; mixed-mode surveys; non-probabilistic survey; overfished; spotted seatrout; stakeholder engagement; SPOTTED SEA-TROUT; ATTITUDES; BAG;
D O I
10.1080/10871209.2024.2309356
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Population declines of spotted seatrout Cynoscion nebulosus have reached levels that warrant management action in Louisiana, USA waters. As regulatory adjustments are necessary to recover the stock, we evaluated the viability of recovery options while gathering preference data from respondents through three survey modes. The modes applied were: (1) a series of public scoping meetings, (2) a probability-based sample of fishing license-holders, and (3) an open-access online survey. Among survey modes, significant differences were seen in avidity, typical harvest, and perceptions of the fishery, indicating that we captured responses from three distinct user groups. Despite these differences, several common themes emerged among all three survey types. Respondents in all survey types indicated strong levels of support for regulations decreasing allowable harvest relative to regulations at the time of survey execution. Specifically, our study presents a viable recovery scenario while accounting for the preferences of multiple user groups.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Mode Effect in Mixed-Mode Surveys Mail and Web Surveys
    Borkan, Bengue
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2010, 28 (03) : 371 - 380
  • [2] Measuring birdwatchers preferences: A case for using online networks and mixed-mode surveys
    Guimaraes, Maria Helena
    Nunes, Luis Catela
    Madureira, Livia
    Santos, Jose Lima
    Boski, Tomasz
    Dentinho, Tomaz
    [J]. TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2015, 46 : 102 - 113
  • [3] Mode effects in concurrent mixed-mode surveys
    Baek, Jeeseon
    Min, Kyung A.
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2016, 29 (05) : 787 - 806
  • [4] ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES IN MIXED-MODE SURVEYS
    DILLMAN, DA
    TARNAI, J
    [J]. TELEPHONE SURVEY METHODOLOGY, 1988, : 509 - 528
  • [5] Response Rates and Mode Preferences in Web-Mail Mixed-Mode Surveys: A Meta-Analysis
    Shih, Tse-Hua
    Fan, Xitao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERNET SCIENCE, 2007, 2 (01) : 59 - 82
  • [6] A Method for Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-mode Surveys
    Vannieuwenhuyze, Jorre
    Loosveldt, Geert
    Molenberghs, Geert
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2010, 74 (05) : 1027 - 1045
  • [7] The Possibility of Mixed-Mode Surveys in Sociological Studies
    Hayashi, Takuya
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF JAPANESE SOCIOLOGY, 2007, 16 (01) : 51 - 63
  • [8] AN IMPUTATION APPROACH FOR HANDLING MIXED-MODE SURVEYS
    Park, Seunghwan
    Kim, Jae Kwang
    Park, Sangun
    [J]. ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2016, 10 (02): : 1063 - 1085
  • [9] Measurement Equivalence in Sequential Mixed-Mode Surveys
    Sakshaug, Joseph W.
    Cernat, Alexandru
    Silverwood, Richard J.
    Ploubidis, George B.
    Calderwood, Lisa
    [J]. SURVEY RESEARCH METHODS, 2022, 16 (01): : 29 - 43
  • [10] IMPROVING RESPONSE TO WEB AND MIXED-MODE SURVEYS
    Millar, Morgan M.
    Dillman, Don A.
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2011, 75 (02) : 249 - 269