Can we project well-being? Towards integral well-being projections in climate models and beyond

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Kedi [1 ]
Wang, Ranran [1 ]
Schrijver, Inge [1 ]
Hoekstra, Rutger [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Inst Environm Sci CML, Leiden, Netherlands
来源
关键词
HEALTH; TEMPERATURE; MORTALITY; IMPACT; FRAMEWORK; DISASTERS; SCENARIOS; HEAT; GDP;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-024-02941-6
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Scientists have proposed many "Beyond-GDP" indicators to replace the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in order to quantify genuine societal development. While GDP is regularly projected, research on future trajectories of Beyond-GDP indicators is lacking, failing to meet policymakers' needs. Focusing on the Human Development Index (HDI), this paper attempts to calculate one of the first global well-being projections for 161 countries by 2100 using the shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs), the socioeconomic inputs underlying global climate change scenarios. The results indicate a potential global well-being improvement from medium to very high level, depending on the SSPs, with most countries reaching high human development under SSPs 1&5. While serving as an initial step in well-being projection, the results highlight a crucial gap in existing climate change models which are used by the IPCC-they inadequately account for the feedback effects of climate change on well-being. This oversight results in counterintuitive or potentially misleading well-being projections. Therefore, we propose steps to improve this situation. By synthesizing climate change feedback effects on HDI determinants, this assessment delves into their implications for well-being and further underscores the necessity for interdisciplinary collaborations among well-being researchers, climate scientists and policy modelers to achieve sound integral well-being projections.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can we project well-being? Towards integral well-being projections in climate models and beyond
    Kedi Liu
    Ranran Wang
    Inge Schrijver
    Rutger Hoekstra
    [J]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11
  • [2] Subjective well-being is essential to well-being
    Diener, E
    Sapyta, JJ
    Suh, E
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 1998, 9 (01) : 33 - 37
  • [3] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING - COMPONENTS OF WELL-BEING
    GLATZER, W
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1987, 19 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [4] Existential Well-Being Spirituality or Well-Being?
    Visser, Anja
    Garssen, Bert
    Vingerhoets, Ad J. J. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 2017, 205 (03) : 234 - 241
  • [5] PROJECT CALLED WELL-BEING
    THOMAS, IE
    FLOWERS, P
    VARNER, LJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1969, 69 (06) : 1260 - 1263
  • [6] Climate Change and Well-Being
    Heap, Brian
    Comim, Flavio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC THEOLOGY, 2009, 3 (01) : 42 - 62
  • [7] Towards an economics of well-being
    McGregor, J. Allister
    Pouw, Nicky
    [J]. CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2017, 41 (04) : 1123 - 1142
  • [8] Pathways towards well-being
    Joshi, Heather
    [J]. LONGITUDINAL AND LIFE COURSE STUDIES, 2020, 11 (02): : 153 - 155
  • [9] Factors of Psychological Well-being and Models of ideal and real Psychological Well-being
    Kalvans, Eriks
    [J]. SOCIETY, INTEGRATION, EDUCATION 2012, VOL II, 2012, : 120 - 131
  • [10] Beyond the school environment: relation between children well-being and family well-being
    Reyes-Rojas, Monica
    Jaimes-Puentes, Yuly
    Patricia Bravo-Suarez, Angela
    [J]. DUAZARY, 2019, 16 (02) : 149 - 158