Actualization of evidence-based nursing in primary, specialized, and social care settings-A cross-sectional survey

被引:1
|
作者
Lotta, Hamari [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Holopainen, Arja [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Johanna, Nyman [4 ]
Heidi, Pukkila [5 ]
Hannele, Siltanen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Heidi, Parisod [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Nursing Res Fdn, Asemamiehenkatu 2, Helsinki 00520, Finland
[2] Finnish Ctr Evidence Based Hlth Care, JBI Ctr Excellence, Helsinki, Finland
[3] WHO Collaborating Ctr Nursing, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Turku, Dept Nursing Sci, Turku, Finland
[5] Free Agent Statistician, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
evidence-based practice; nursing; primary healthcare; social care; specialized healthcare;
D O I
10.1111/wvn.12701
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
BackgroundBasing practice on evidence is a widely acknowledged requirement for nursing, but shortcomings still exist. An increased understanding of the actualization of evidence-based nursing (EBN) across different nursing contexts is needed to develop better support for EBN and promote uniform high-quality nursing.AimsThe aim of this study was to compare the actualization of EBN in different organizational contexts in Finland.MethodsData for this survey were collected in 2021. The actualization of EBN in primary, specialized, and social care organizations was evaluated with the Actualization of Evidence-Based Nursing instrument, nurses' version, which focuses on individual and organizational-level EBN support structures. Differences between (1) specialized and primary healthcare, and (2) different nursing practice settings were tested with Welch's two sample t-test, the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test.ResultsBased on nurse (n = 1020) evaluations, those working in specialized healthcare hold more positive attitudes toward EBN (p = .021) and evaluated their organization's methods for monitoring and evaluating nursing practices (p = .004) more positively than those working in primary healthcare. Regarding different nursing practice settings (n = 1241), the most positive results were observed within preventive healthcare where nurses evaluated their attitudes toward EBN, EBN competence, and personal evidence-based practices more positively compared to other nursing practice settings. The results were parallel regarding several organizational structures for EBN. Positive results were also observed within somatic units at university hospitals, and most negative results were within institutional care settings, health centers, and home care settings.Linking Evidence to ActionThere is a need for targeted support to strengthen EBN across different organizational contexts, with special attention to those contexts where nursing professionals with lower education levels work. Future research needs to focus on further analyzing the organizational differences and what can be learned, especially from preventive healthcare but also somatic units at university hospitals.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 147
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Social Media and Evidence-Based Maternity Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study
    Dekker, Rebecca L.
    King, Sarah
    Lester, Kara
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL EDUCATION, 2016, 25 (02): : 105 - 115
  • [2] Evidence-Based Practice in Primary Care Occupational Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Sweden
    Lindstrom, Ann-Charlotte
    Bernhardsso, Susanne
    OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY INTERNATIONAL, 2018,
  • [3] Nursing and midwifery use, perceptions and barriers to evidence-based practice: a cross-sectional survey
    Fry, Margaret
    Attawet, Jutharat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2018, 16 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [4] Effect of evidence-based nursing practices on individualised care: A cross-sectional descriptive study
    Ozdemir, Cevriye
    Sendir, Merdiye
    Eren, Rabia
    Bakir, Gizem Kubat
    Kizil, Hamiyet
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2025, 31 (01)
  • [5] Cross-sectional survey study of primary care clinics on evidence-based colorectal cancer screening intervention use
    Watanabe-Galloway, Shinobu
    Kim, Jungyoon
    LaCrete, Frantzlee
    Samson, Kaeli
    Foster, Jason
    Farazi, Paraskevi A.
    LeVan, Tricia
    Napit, Krishtee
    JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2022, 38 (04): : 845 - 854
  • [6] Predictors of Social Work Practitioner Engagement in Evidence-Based Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey
    Parrish, Danielle
    Lemmons, Brianna
    Washburn, Micki
    Oxhandler, Holly
    Sturdivant, Rodney
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED SOCIAL WORK, 2023, 20 (03) : 425 - 443
  • [7] Primary care nursing competencies in Canadian undergraduate nursing programs: A national cross-sectional survey
    Lukewich, Julia
    Mathews, Maria
    Poitras, Marie-Eve
    Tranmer, Joan
    Martin-Misener, Ruth
    Bryant-Lukosius, Denise
    Aubrey-Bassler, Kris
    Klassen, Treena
    Curnew, Deanne
    Bulman, Donna
    Leamon, Toni
    Ryan, Dana
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2023, 71
  • [8] Clinical decision support in promoting evidence-based nursing in primary healthcare: a cross-sectional study in Finland
    Hamari, Lotta
    Parisod, Heidi
    Siltanen, Hannele
    Heikkila, Kristiina
    Kortteisto, Tiina
    Kunnamo, Ilkka
    Pukkila, Heidi
    Holopainen, Arja
    JBI EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION, 2023, 21 (03): : 294 - 300
  • [9] Depression in primary care and the role of evidence-based guidelines: cross-sectional data from primary care physicians in Germany
    Lech, Sonia
    Herrmann, Wolfram
    Trautmann, Sebastian
    Schwantes, Ulrich
    Gellert, Paul
    Behr, Joachim
    Buspavanich, Pichit
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [10] Depression in primary care and the role of evidence-based guidelines: cross-sectional data from primary care physicians in Germany
    Sonia Lech
    Wolfram Herrmann
    Sebastian Trautmann
    Ulrich Schwantes
    Paul Gellert
    Joachim Behr
    Pichit Buspavanich
    BMC Health Services Research, 22