Validity of an automated screening Dixon technique for quantifying hepatic steatosis in living liver donors

被引:2
|
作者
Song, Sangkeun [1 ]
Kim, Hokun [1 ]
Choi, Joon-Il [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Dong Hwan [1 ]
Kim, Bohyun [1 ]
Lee, Hyunsoo [3 ]
Lee, Jiwon [4 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, 222 Banpo Daero, Seoul 06591, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Canc Res Inst, 222 Banpo Daero, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Siemens Healthineers Ltd, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Chung Ang Univ, Red Cross Coll Nursing, 84 Heukseok Ro, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Liver; Steatosis; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Liver transplantation; DENSITY FAT FRACTION; DISEASE; SPECTROSCOPY; QUANTIFICATION; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-023-04009-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the validity of an automated screening Dixon (e-DIXON) technique for quantifying hepatic steatosis in living liver-donor patients by comparison with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) as a reference standard.Methods A total of 285 living liver-donor candidates were examined with the e-DIXON technique and single-voxel MRS to assess hepatic steatosis and iron deposition between January 2014 and February 2019. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of the e-DIXON technique for hepatic steatosis were calculated. The mean fat signal fractions obtained in MRS were compared between the donors diagnosed with hepatic steatosis and the normal group. The mean R2 values of donors with or without hepatic siderosis also were compared.Results The e-DIXON technique diagnosed normal in 133 (47%), fat in 124 (44%), iron in one (0.4%), and a combination of both fat and iron in 27 (10%) donors. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for diagnosing hepatic steatosis were 94%, 70%, 64%, and 96%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the mean fat signal fraction obtained in MRS between the steatosis and normal groups (p < 0.001), but R2 values were not significantly different between siderosis and normal groups (p = 0.11). The e-DIXON technique showed a strong correlation with MRS in fat measurement (r(2) = 0.92, p < 0.001).Conclusion The e-DIXON technique reliably screens for hepatic steatosis but may not accurate for detecting hepatic iron deposition.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 413
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity of an automated screening Dixon technique for quantifying hepatic steatosis in living liver donors
    Sangkeun Song
    Hokun Kim
    Joon-Il Choi
    Dong Hwan Kim
    Bohyun Kim
    Hyunsoo Lee
    Jiwon Lee
    Abdominal Radiology, 2024, 49 : 406 - 413
  • [2] SCREENING OF POTENTIAL LIVING DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANT DONORS FOR HEPATIC STEATOSIS
    Lin, Jessica
    Ghadimi, Maryam
    Kim, Ahyoung
    Wang, Jacqueline G.
    King, Elizabeth
    Wesson, Russell
    Woreta, Tinsay A.
    Kohli, Ruhail
    Kamel, Ihab
    Cameron, Andrew M.
    Philosophe, Benjamin
    Gurakar, Ahmet
    HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 74 : 865A - 865A
  • [3] MR Based Dixon Imaging and Spectroscopy Is an Accurate Technique for Evaluation of Hepatic Steatosis in Living Donors
    Krishan, Sonal
    Saraf, Neeraj
    Gautam, Dheeraj
    Goja, Sanjay
    Rastogi, Amit
    Menon, P. Balachandran
    Bhangui, Prashant
    Ramachandran, Sumanna
    Saigal, Sanjiv
    Baijal, Sanjay Saran
    Soin, Arvinder Singh
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 99 : 183 - 183
  • [4] Predictors of Hepatic Steatosis in Living Liver Donors
    Yalakanti, Raghavendra Babu
    Saraff, Neeraj
    Piplani, Tarun
    Gautam, Dheeraj
    Saigal, Sanjiv
    Mohanka, Ravi
    Rastogi, Amit
    Goja, Sanjay
    Menon, Balachandran
    Bhangui, Prashant
    Soin, Arvinder Singh
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 20 : S256 - S256
  • [5] PREDICTORS OF HEPATIC STEATOSIS IN LIVING LIVER DONORS
    Minina, M. G.
    Voronov, D. V.
    Nevredimov, A. A.
    Tenchurina, E. A.
    VESTNIK TRANSPLANTOLOGII I ISKUSSTVENNYH ORGANOV, 2022, 24 (04): : 118 - 123
  • [6] Predictors of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors
    Karasu, Z
    Tokat, Y
    Nart, D
    Celebi, A
    Arikan, C
    Kilic, M
    Akarca, US
    Sebnem, O
    Demirbas, T
    Gurgen, U
    Gunsar, F
    Ersoz, G
    Batur, Y
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2003, 38 : 149 - 149
  • [7] Biochemical and radiologic predictors of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors
    Karasu, Z
    Kilic, M
    Orguc, S
    Nart, D
    Kobat, A
    Akarca, U
    Aydogdu, S
    Demirbas, T
    Akyildiz, M
    Arikan, C
    Tokat, Y
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (06) : C82 - C82
  • [8] Is Body Mass Index as a predictor of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors?
    Bozkurt, B.
    Adali, G.
    Dayangac, M.
    Yuzer, Y.
    Tokat, Y.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 102 : 223 - 224
  • [9] Identification of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors by machine learning models
    Lim, Jihye
    Han, Seungbong
    Lee, Danbi
    Shim, Ju Hyun
    Kim, Kang Mo
    Lim, Young-Suk
    Lee, Han Chu
    Jung, Dong Hwan
    Lee, Sung-Gyu
    Kim, Ki-Hun
    Choi, Jonggi
    HEPATOLOGY COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 6 (07) : 1689 - 1698
  • [10] Effectiveness of MRI methods in the assessment of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors
    Oz, Digdem Kuru
    Ellik, Zeynep Melekoglu
    Coruh, Ayscommaegul Gursoy
    Adiguzel, Mehmet
    Gumussoy, Mesut
    Duman, Serkan
    Er, Ramazan Erdem
    Kirimker, Onur
    Balci, Deniz
    Gokcan, Hale
    Idilman, Ramazan
    Erden, Ayse
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 77 : S778 - S778