Bull field fertility differences can be estimated with in vitro sperm capacitation and flow cytometry

被引:4
|
作者
Zoca, Saulo Menegatti [1 ,2 ]
Geary, Thomas W. [3 ]
Zezeski, Abigail L. [3 ]
Kerns, Karl C. [4 ]
Dalton, Joseph C. [5 ]
Harstine, Bo R. [6 ]
Utt, Matthew D. [6 ]
Cushman, Robert A. [7 ]
Walker, Julie A. [2 ]
Perry, George A. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Anim Sci, Knoxville, TN USA
[2] South Dakota State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Brookings, SD USA
[3] ARS, Ft Keogh Livestock & Range Res Lab, USDA, Miles City, MT USA
[4] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ames, IA USA
[5] Univ Idaho, Anim & Vet Sci Dept, Caldwell, ID USA
[6] Select Sires Inc, Plain City, OH USA
[7] ARS, Roman L Hruska US Meat Anim Res Ctr, USDA, Clay Ctr, NE USA
[8] Texas A&M AgriLife Res & Extens Ctr, Overton, TX 79403 USA
来源
关键词
bull fertility; capacitation; CD9; protein; flow cytometry; sperm; zinc signature; ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION; ACROSOME REACTION; SEMEN QUALITY; CHROMATIN-STRUCTURE; BOVINE SPERM; VIABILITY; MEMBRANE; FERTILIZATION; SPERMATOZOA; FUSION;
D O I
10.3389/fanim.2023.1180975
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
IntroductionThis study evaluated whether post in vitro capacitation changes in sperm could be used to estimate field fertility differences between bulls. MethodsFrozen-thawed semen from five bulls (two to four ejaculates per bull) previously identified as high (48.1% and 47.7%), intermediary (45.5%) or low (40.7% and 43.1%) fertility, based on pregnancy per AI (P/AI), were evaluated for total and progressive motility, sperm plasma membrane integrity (viability), acrosome integrity (viable sperm with an intact or disrupted acrosome), reactive oxygen species (ROS; viable sperm ROS+ or ROS-), mitochondrial membrane energy potential, zinc signatures (signatures 1-to-4) and CD9 protein populations at pre-wash and post-wash (only total and progressive motility), h0 (diluted with non-capacitation media), and at h0, h0 CM, h3, h6, and h24 after dilution with capacitation media (CM) and incubation at 37oC. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure as repeated measures in SAS with bull, time and the interaction as fixed effects. ResultsBull by time interaction was significant (P <= 0.03) for total motility, viability, viable sperm with disrupted acrosome, and zinc signature 3. There tended (P=0.06) to be a bull by time interaction for zinc signatures 1+2 combined. Time was significant (P <= 0.003) in all analyses, except viable ROS- (P=0.12). There was a significant effect of bull (P <= 0.03) for viability, viable sperm with disrupted acrosome, zinc signatures 1, 2 and 1+2, viable CD9- and dead CD9+. High and intermediary fertility bulls had greater (P <= 0.04) percentages of viable sperm, zinc signature 2 and zinc signature 1+2 compared to low fertility bulls. High and intermediary fertility bulls had decreased (P <= 0.05) percentage of dead CD9+ compared to low fertility bulls. Viable CD9+ differed (P=0.02) and viable sperm with an intact acrosome and viable CD9+ tended to differ (P=0.06) amongst bulls; however, association with field fertility was not observed. There was a positive correlation between P/AI and zinc signature 2 (P=0.04), and there tended to be a positive correlation between P/AI and viability (P=0.10), and zinc signature 1+2 (P=0.10). DiscussionIn summary, incubation of sperm in CM and flow cytometry analyses for viability, zinc signatures 2 and 1+2, and dead CD9+ seems promising to estimate in vivo fertility differences amongst bulls.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of boar and bull sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction using flow cytometry
    Purdy, Phillip H.
    Graham, James K.
    Azevedo, Hymerson C.
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2022, 246
  • [2] Use of computer-assisted sperm analyses (CASA) and flow cytometry to explain Angus bull field fertility differences
    Zoca, S. Menegatti
    Shafii, B.
    Price, W.
    Harstine, B.
    McDonald, K.
    Utt, M.
    Cruppe, L.
    DeJarnette, M.
    Peters, L.
    Moraes Vasconcelos, J.
    Dalton, J.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 : 55 - 56
  • [3] Effect of adding cholesterol to bull sperm membranes on sperm capacitation, the acrosome reaction, and fertility
    Purdy, PH
    Graham, JK
    BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2004, 71 (02) : 522 - 527
  • [4] Flow cytometry analysis of sperm chromatin structure assay and sperm viability assay and its association with bull fertility
    Kasimanickam, R
    Kasimanickam, V
    Nebel, R
    Pelzer, K
    Thatcher, C
    Purswell, B
    Cassell, B
    THERIOGENOLOGY, 2005, 64 (03) : 797 - 797
  • [5] Sperm apoptosis in fresh and cryopreserved bull semen detected by flow cytometry and its relationship with fertility
    Anzar, M
    He, LW
    Buhr, MM
    Kroetsch, TG
    Pauls, KP
    BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2002, 66 (02) : 354 - 360
  • [6] Commercial application of flow cytometry for evaluating bull sperm
    DeJarnette, J. M.
    Harstine, B. R.
    McDonald, K.
    Marshall, C. E.
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2022, 246
  • [7] INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN CAPACITATION OF BULL SPERMATOZOA BY HEPARIN INVITRO - RELATIONSHIP TO FERTILITY
    BLOTTNER, S
    NEHRING, H
    TORNER, H
    THERIOGENOLOGY, 1990, 34 (03) : 619 - 628
  • [8] In vitro sperm mucus penetration test to evaluate bull fertility
    Dev, S
    Pangawkar, GR
    Sharma, RK
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 1996, 66 (10): : 1021 - 1022
  • [9] Sperm Characteristics in Cryopreserved Buffalo Bull Semen and Field Fertility
    Mahmoud, K. G. M.
    El-Sokary, A. A. E.
    Abou El-Roos, M. E. A.
    Ghaffar, A. D. Abdel
    Nawito, M.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 3 (04): : 777 - 783
  • [10] Protein-leakage during heparin -: induced in-vitro capacitation of bull sperm
    Dhanju, Charanjit Kaur
    Kaur, Ravinder
    Cheema, Ranjna S.
    ARCHIV FUR TIERZUCHT-ARCHIVES OF ANIMAL BREEDING, 2006, 49 (05): : 426 - 433