A review on the use of finite element simulations for structural analyses of coronary stenting: What can we do nowadays and what do we need to move forward?

被引:1
|
作者
Antonini, Luca [1 ]
Poletti, Gianluca [1 ]
Pennati, Giancarlo [1 ]
Petrini, Lorenza [2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Chem Mat & Chem Engn Giulio Natta, Lab Biol Struct Mech, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Politecn Milan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Coronary stent; Finite element simulation contexts of use; validation; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID-DYNAMICS; BALLOON-EXPANDABLE STENT; FATIGUE LIFE ANALYSIS; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; CORROSION MODEL; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; EXPANSION BEHAVIOR; ELUTING STENTS; ARTERY; BIFURCATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.105071
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
In silico studies to perform structural analyses of coronary stenting have attracted the attention of many researchers in the last 25 years. As a consequence, the finite element models used to describe the fundamental elements of stenting simulations, namely the delivery system (consisting of stent and balloon), the diseased artery, and the deployment procedure have had considerable development, paving the way for the application of numerical analyses in both manufacturing and clinical contexts. Indeed, in accordance with the logic of the 3Rs (refine, reduce, and replace), simulations can play a fundamental role in developing new devices and as a support tool for training/education and operational planning activities for clinical personnel. However, the application of such numerical methodologies in the aforementioned contexts of use requires an adequate level of credibility of the models with respect to the risk associated to their use in the decision-making process. Within this framework, this paper proposes a review of the modeling approaches available today for in silico stenting of coronary arteries and a discussion of their actual or potential application areas. In particular, the attention is focused on the different levels of credibility required by the presented contexts of use with respect to the validation activities of numerical models developed up to now.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What do we need to move enzybiotic bioinformatics forward?
    Baldysz, Sophia
    Dabrowska, Krystyna
    Barylski, Jakub
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [2] Quantification in PET: What is it? Can we do it? Do we need it?
    Marsden, PK
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2004, 25 (07) : 635 - 636
  • [3] Chlamydial vaccines: what do we need, what can we deliver
    Beagley, K. W.
    Wilson, D. P.
    Timms, P.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2010, 86 (01) : 25 - 26
  • [4] What we want to do can drive what we need to learn
    Bateman, H
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2001, 35 (05) : 514 - 514
  • [5] Complexipacity What is it? Do we need it? Can we get it?
    Snyder, David
    ON THE HORIZON, 2010, 18 (01)
  • [6] Ecological transformation of medical rehabilitation: what can we know and what do we need to do?
    Worringen, U.
    Becker, P.
    Reusch, A.
    Kueffner, R.
    Reudelsterz, C.
    Pawel, A.
    Weimann, E.
    REHABILITATION, 2023, 62 (03) : 133 - 139
  • [7] Who Are We, What Can We Do, and What Do We Think? Review on EAP Teacher Development
    Du, Jianying
    Li, Weiping
    Li, Qiong
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2022, 45 (04) : 532 - 550
  • [8] Writing an impactful review article: What do we know and what do we need to know?
    Paul, Justin
    Merchant, Altaf
    Dwivedi, Yogesh K.
    Rose, Gregory
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 133 : 337 - 340
  • [9] The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?
    Paul, Justin
    Criado, Alex Rialp
    INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2020, 29 (04)
  • [10] Influenza as an issue on the agenda of health care workers: What can we do? What do we need?
    McElhaney, Janet
    VACCINE, 2006, 24 (44-46) : 6791 - 6792