Combined pectoralis II block and transversus thoracic plane block compared to erector spinae plane block for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy: A randomized clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Abedalmohsen, Abualauon M. [1 ,4 ]
Mohammed, Abdelrahman H. [1 ]
Bakri, Mohamed H. [1 ]
Othman, Ahmed H. [2 ]
Osman, Mohammed A. [3 ]
Wahba, Ola M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Assiut Univ, Fac Med, Intens Care & Pain Management, Asyut, Egypt
[2] Assiut Univ, South Egypt Canc Inst, Intens Care & Pain Management, Asyut, Egypt
[3] Assiut Univ, Fac Med, Dept Clin Pathol, Asyut, Egypt
[4] Assiut Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesia, Intens Care & Pain Management, Asyut 71515, Egypt
来源
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA | 2023年 / 39卷 / 01期
关键词
ESPB; PECSII-TTP; morphine consumption; mult-imodal analgesia; PECS II; ULTRASOUND;
D O I
10.1080/11101849.2023.2287892
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: About 30% of Egyptian females had breast cancer. Surgery is a cornerstone of the treatment plan. New fascial plane block techniques enhance recovery and improve intra-operative and post-operative pain control.Aim of the study: Effect of combined pectoralis II plus transversus thoracic plane blocks (PECS II- TTP) versus erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on post-operative morphine consumption, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels 24 hours after surgery.Methods: Sixty-four female patients 18-60 years of age, ASA I or II were divided into two equal groups (32 patients each). Group (P) received a combination of PECS II and TTP blocks (injection of 10 ml 0.25% bupivacaine between pectoralis major (PM) and minor (Pm) muscles and 10 ml between the Pm and serratus anterior (Sa) muscles) at the third or the fourth rib, then 10 ml and the internal inter-costal muscles and the transversus thoracic muscle. Group (E) received ESPB (30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine injected deep to the erector spinae muscle at the transverse process of the fifth thoracic vertebrae).Results: Morphine consumption was significantly lower in group (E) throughout the 24 hours period of post-operative follow-up (0.93 +/- 0.63 vs. 2.13 +/- 0.42 (mg); p = 0.03). Both groups had comparable time till the first analgesic request (p = 0.23). There was statistically non-significant difference between the two groups regarding the numeric rating scale (NRS) (P > 0.05), and post-operative IL6 either at baseline (10.03 +/- 4.09 vs. 10.73 +/- 3.54; p = 0.48) or at 24 hours after surgery (239.01 +/- 122.11 vs. 278.08 +/- 151.29; p = 0.30). Both groups had non-significant difference regarding post-operative nausea and vomiting.Conclusion: ESPB is as effective as PECS II-TTP with lower morphine consumption in the first 24 hours and comparable NRS, time to first analgesic request, and interleukin-6 levels. Both blocks were safe without any major complications.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 928
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Erector spinae plane block an effective block for post-operative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy
    Singh, Swati
    Chowdhary, Neeraj Kumar
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 62 (02) : 148 - 150
  • [2] Comparison of efficacy of Erector Spinae plane block and Transversus Abdominus plane block for post-operative analgesia in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
    Srivastava, Divya
    Singh, Tapas K.
    Sahu, Sandeep
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2022, 134 : 682 - 685
  • [3] Hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine for erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Cao, Xue
    Bao, Malian
    Ma, Yuhua
    Ren, Jie
    Ma, Weiwei
    Bao, Yongli
    Ma, Changfei
    Sui, Xin
    Nie, Yongzhen
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (26)
  • [4] Assessment of ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block for early post-operative analgesia for modified radical mastectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
    Kumar, Prashant
    Singh, Anu
    Sharma, Jyoti
    Parshad, Sanjeev
    Johar, Sanjay
    Kaur, Kiranpreet
    [J]. MEDICAL GAS RESEARCH, 2024, 14 (04): : 201 - 205
  • [5] Serratus anterior plane block (posterior approach) versus erector spinae plane block in modified radical mastectomy; A randomized comparative trial
    Wagih Gamal, Bakinam
    Abo- Ollo, Magda Mohamed
    Alamrawy, Wessam Zakaria
    Hozien, Adel Ibrahim
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 40 (01): : 160 - 170
  • [6] Comparison of rhomboid intercostal nerve block, erector spinae plane block and serratus plane block on analgesia for modified radical mastectomy: A prospective randomised controlled trial
    Jiang, Chen-Wei
    Liu, Fen
    Zhou, Qinghe
    Deng, Wei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021,
  • [7] RETRACTED: A combination of an erector spinae plane block and a transversus thoracic muscle plane block for partial mastectomy (Retracted Article)
    Ueshima, Hironobu
    Otake, Hiroshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2019, 54 : 1 - 1
  • [8] The Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Combined with Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wang, Xunxun
    Ran, Guo
    Chen, Xia
    Xie, Cuiyu
    Wang, Jing
    Liu, Xuesheng
    Lu, Yao
    Fang, Weiping
    [J]. PAIN AND THERAPY, 2021, 10 (01) : 475 - 484
  • [9] The Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Combined with Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Xunxun Wang
    Guo Ran
    Xia Chen
    Cuiyu Xie
    Jing Wang
    Xuesheng Liu
    Yao Lu
    Weiping Fang
    [J]. Pain and Therapy, 2021, 10 : 475 - 484
  • [10] A comparison of paravertebral block, erector spinae plane block and the combination of erector spinae plane block and paravertebral block for post-operative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A randomised controlled trial
    Fu, Ze
    Zhang, Yi
    Zhou, Yongjian
    Li, Zhe
    Wang, Kexin
    Li, Hongqing
    Jiang, Wenwen
    Liu, Zimeng
    Cao, Xuezhao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2022, 18 (02) : 241 - 247