The environmental occurrence, fate, and risks of 25 endocrine disruptors in Slovenian waters

被引:0
|
作者
Grobin, Andrej [1 ]
Roskar, Robert [1 ]
Trontelj, Jurij [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Pharm, Askerceva Cesta 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
关键词
Endocrine disruptors; WWTP; Surface waters; Risk assessment; Environmental occurrence; TREATMENT PLANTS; RIVER; REMOVAL; CONTAMINANTS; PROGESTINS; MECHANISMS; MIXTURES; EXPOSURE; ANALOGS; FISH;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167245
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Natural hormones, synthetic steroids and bisphenols are among the most active endocrine disruptors (EDs) in the aquatic environment, with great potential for causing adverse effects in aquatic organisms and humans. In this study, a focused group of 25 potent estrogenic and other ED compounds were simultaneously measured in wastewaters (WWs) and receiving surface waters (SWs) before and after wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), where their removal efficiency was also estimated. Up to 16 of 25 EDs were successfully quantified in SWs and WWs, with bisphenols BPS, BPA, and BPF together with estriol and chlormadinone being the most prevalent with the highest measured concentrations of up to 35 mu g/L in WWs and 400 ng/L in SWs. High load and insufficient removal of these substances by WWTPs lead to a significant increase in their concentrations in the receiving SWs downstream, while other sources could be responsible for an important portion of river contamination with EDs. Removal efficiency was very good for most EDs, although only from 0 to 44 % for E2, which shows a need for the improvement of current removal techniques. E2 and EE2 contribute the most to the alarmingly high risks of the total ED estrogenic potential, with the value increased by 36 % in SWs downstream from WWTPs, and the RQ value for the total estrogenic potential in individual SW samples being three orders of magnitude higher than that representing high risk. An additional comprehensive multi-parameter risk assessment determined high risk quotient and priority index values for BPA, E2, BPS and E1 with values of up to 450 in SWs. Our results show a focused insight into the risks associated with an important group of EDs and the role of WWTPs, while further highlighting the importance of regular monitoring of the environmental occurrence and risks of a focused range of EDs.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endocrine disruptors. Occurrence, risks and methods for determination
    Szewczynska, Malgorzata
    Dobrzynska, Elzbieta
    PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2018, 97 (02): : 230 - 237
  • [2] Environmental fate of phenolic endocrine disruptors: field and laboratory studies
    Giger, Walter
    Gabriel, Frederic L. P.
    Jonkers, Niels
    Wettstein, Felix E.
    Kohler, Hans-Peter E.
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2009, 367 (1904): : 3941 - 3963
  • [3] Endocrine disruptors: Can biological effects and environmental risks be predicted?
    Witorsch, RJ
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 36 (01) : 118 - 130
  • [4] Organic Synthetic Environmental Endocrine Disruptors: Structural Classes and Metabolic Fate
    Schmidt, Jan
    Masic, Lucija Peterlin
    ACTA CHIMICA SLOVENICA, 2012, 59 (04) : 722 - 738
  • [5] Antiandrogens as environmental endocrine disruptors
    Kelce, WR
    Gray, LE
    Wilson, EM
    REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 1998, 10 (01) : 105 - 111
  • [6] Environmental endocrine disruptors.
    Iguchi, T
    NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, 1998, 64 (05) : 899 - 900
  • [7] Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors in South Korean surface, drinking, and waste waters
    Kim, Sang D.
    Cho, Jaeweon
    Kim, In S.
    Vanderford, Brett J.
    Snyder, Shane A.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2007, 41 (05) : 1013 - 1021
  • [8] Environmental Endocrine Disruptors and Endometriosis
    Rumph, Jelonia T.
    Stephens, Victoria R.
    Archibong, Anthony E.
    Osteen, Kevin G.
    Bruner-Tran, Kaylon L.
    ANIMAL MODELS FOR ENDOMETRIOSIS: EVOLUTION, UTILITY AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE, 2020, 232 : 57 - 78
  • [9] Environmental chemicals as endocrine disruptors
    Carpenter, David O.
    Sly, Peter D.
    REVIEWS ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 31 (04) : 399 - 399
  • [10] Environmental endocrine disruptors and fertility
    Gaspari, L.
    Paris, F.
    Soyer-Gobillard, M-O
    Kalfa, N.
    Sultan, C.
    Hamamah, S.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2022, 50 (05): : 402 - 408