Visual-cortical enhancement by acoustic distractors: The effects of endogenous spatial attention and visual working memory load

被引:0
|
作者
Cavicchi, Shari [1 ]
De Cesarei, Andrea [1 ]
Valsecchi, Matteo [1 ]
Codispoti, Maurizio [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Psychol, Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum, Dept Psychol, Viale Berti Pichat, I-40127 Bologna, Italy
关键词
Attention; Visual working memory; Distraction; Sound processing; Auditory; -Evoked; Contralateral Occipital Positivity; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; STORAGE; ARTIFACTS; CAPACITY; STIMULI; SALIENT; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108512
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Past work has shown that when a peripheral sound captures our attention, it activates the contralateral visual cortex as revealed by an event-related potential component labelled the auditory-evoked contralateral occipital positivity (ACOP). This cross-modal activation of the visual cortex has been observed even when the sounds were not relevant to the ongoing task (visual or auditory), suggesting that peripheral sounds automatically activate the visual cortex. However, it is unclear whether top-down factors such as visual working memory (VWM) load and endogenous attention, which modulate the impact of task-irrelevant information, may modulate this spatiallyspecific component. Here, we asked participants to perform a lateralized VWM task (change detection), whose performance is supported by both endogenous spatial attention and VWM storage. A peripheral sound that was unrelated to the ongoing task was delivered during the retention interval. The amplitude of sound-elicited ACOP was analyzed as a function of the spatial correspondence with the cued hemifield, and of the memory array setsize. The typical ACOP modulation was observed over parieto-occipital sites in the 280-500 ms time window after sound onset. Its amplitude was not affected by VWM load but was modulated when the location of the sound did not correspond to the hemifield (right or left) that was cued for the change detection task. Our results suggest that sound-elicited activation of visual cortices, as reflected in the ACOP modulation, is unaffected by visual working memory load. However, endogenous spatial attention affects the ACOP, challenging the hypothesis that it reflects an automatic process.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of cholinergic enhancement on visual stimulation, spatial attention, and spatial working memory
    Bentley, P
    Husain, M
    Dolan, RJ
    NEURON, 2004, 41 (06) : 969 - 982
  • [2] The role of working memory load in processing visual distractors
    de Fockert, J
    Rees, G
    Frith, C
    Lavie, N
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, : 89 - 89
  • [3] Filtering performance in visual working memory is improved by reducing early spatial attention to the distractors
    Allon, Ayala S.
    Luria, Roy
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 56 (05)
  • [4] The effects of capacity load and resolution load on visual selective attention during visual working memory
    Li Shouxin
    Che Xiaowei
    Li Yanjiao
    Wang Li
    Chen Kaisheng
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 51 (05) : 527 - 542
  • [5] Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory
    Zhang, Bao
    Zhang, John X.
    Huang, Sai
    Kong, Lingyue
    Wang, Suiping
    VISION RESEARCH, 2011, 51 (23-24) : 2356 - 2361
  • [6] Crossmodal effects of attention: Visual load modulates processing of visual and auditory distractors
    Parks, Nathan A.
    Hilimire, Matthew R.
    Corballis, Paul M.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 44 : S78 - S78
  • [7] Visual Working Memory Load Affects Visual Detection: Attention Resource Competition or Cortical Resource Competition?
    Yao, Nailang
    Guo, Yang
    Gao, Zaifeng
    I-PERCEPTION, 2019, 10 : 137 - 137
  • [8] Working memory load modulates visual selective attention
    O'Kane, G
    Wagner, A
    Tun, P
    Corkin, S
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, : 141 - 141
  • [9] The automatic encoding of distractors into visual working memory through overt, but not covert attention
    Tas, A. Caglar
    Luck, Steven J.
    Hollingworth, Andrew
    VISUAL COGNITION, 2011, 19 (10) : 1331 - 1335
  • [10] Separating the Effects of Visual Working Memory Load and Attentional Zoom on Selective Attention
    Lee, Hyuksu
    Jeong, Su Keun
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2020, 46 (05) : 502 - 511