The evolution of the concept of sensory ecology and the influence of behavioral ecology

被引:0
|
作者
Willemart, Rodrigo H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Escola Artes Ciencias & Human, Lab Ecol Sensorial & Comportamento Artropodes LESC, Rua Arlindo Bettio 1000, BR-03828000 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Programa Posgrad Zool, Inst Biociencias, Rua Matao 321,Travessa 1, BR-05508090 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
historical context; behavioral ecology; ethology; mechanism; proximal;
D O I
10.1590/0001-3765202320220302
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The science of sensory ecology formally emerged in the book of Ali (1978), when behavioral ecology was gaining popularity. Until 2020, three main books were written on the subject, in 1992 (Dusenbery 1992), 2001 (Barth & Schmid 2001) and 2013 (Stevens 2013). The definitions of sensory ecology provided by Ali emphasize adaptation, optimality and fitness. These are main concepts of behavioral ecology but the last two are not necessarily fundamentals of sensory ecology. Here I looked at the evolution of the concept of sensory ecology and tried to understand whether there is evidence that the definitions given in 1978 had been influenced by behavioral ecology. I have counted the appearances of these three words (adapt*, optim* and fitness) in these books, divided by the number of words in each book, and compared the numbers to the definitions of sensory ecology given. Authors in Ali"s book often use adaptation but seldom deal with optimality or fitness. I suggest that the appearance of these keywords of behavioral ecology in the definitions of sensory ecology in Ali"s book was maybe a necessity to fit in the paradigms of that time. Sensory ecology was actually mechanistic in 1978 and 1992. Sensory ecology is now both mechanistic and evolutionary.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条