Injunctive and Descriptive Normative Feedback for College Drinking Prevention: Is the Whole Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts?

被引:9
|
作者
Larimer, Mary E. [1 ]
Graupensperger, Scott [1 ]
Lewis, Melissa A. [2 ]
Cronce, Jessica M. [3 ]
Kilmer, Jason R. [1 ]
Atkins, David C. [1 ]
Lee, Christine M. [1 ]
Garberson, Lisa A. [4 ]
Walter, Theresa [1 ]
Ghaidarov, Tehniat M. [5 ]
Hummer, Justin F. [6 ]
Neighbors, Clayton [7 ]
LaBrie, Joseph W. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, 1959 NE Pacific St,Box 357238, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ North Texas Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Syst, Ft Worth, TX USA
[3] Univ Oregon, Dept Counseling Psychol & Human Serv, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Family Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Loyola Marymount Univ, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90045 USA
[6] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
[7] Univ Houston, Dept Psychol, Houston, TX 77004 USA
关键词
alcohol; descriptive norms; injunctive norms; personalized feedback; young adults; ALCOHOL-CONSUMPTION; HEAVY DRINKING; NORMS; STUDENTS; EFFICACY; INTERVENTIONS; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1037/adb0000893
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Single-component personalized normative feedback (PNF) interventions and multicomponent personalized feedback interventions (PFI) have been shown to reduce alcohol consumption among college students. The present study compared the efficacy of PNF interventions targeting descriptive norms alone (descriptive PNF), injunctive norms alone (injunctive PNF), or their combination (combined PNF), against a multicomponent PFI and an attention control condition. Method: Undergraduates (N = 1,137) across two universities who reported a minimum of one past-month episode of heavy episodic drinking (i.e., 4+/5+ drinks on a single occasion for females/males) completed assessments at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months postintervention. Results: Relative to the attention control, participants in each of the four intervention conditions showed greater reductions in perceived descriptive/injunctive norms, total drinks per week, and alcohol-related consequences. Peak estimated blood alcohol concentration was also reduced in the injunctive PNF, combined PNF, and multicomponent PFI conditions, with the latter two conditions showing an advantage for duration of effects. The multicomponent PFI condition also evidenced greater reductions than the injunctive PNF in descriptive norms at 3-month and injunctive norms at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. No other group comparisons on any outcome were significant. Conclusions: Each intervention has merit for use in college student harm reduction efforts. Single-component or combined PNF could be considered a potential starting point, as PNF is less burdensome than a multicomponent PFI when considering ease and length of delivery. Results can inform optimization of norms-based interventions and guide recommendations on efficacious components for reducing alcohol use and harms on college campuses. Public Health Significance Statement This study examined relative efficacy of four web-based interventions for college student drinking containing normative feedback, all of which showed evidence of efficacy compared to an attention control condition. The three personalized normative feedback interventions (focused individually on descriptive and injunctive norms and their combination) showed relatively comparable efficacy to a comprehensive multicomponent personalized feedback intervention (inclusive of both types of normative feedback and other elements) and may be easier to scale.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 461
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INJUNCTIVE AND DESCRIPTIVE NORMS FEEDBACK FOR COLLEGE DRINKING PREVENTION: IS THE WHOLE GREATER THAN THE SUM OF THE PARTS?
    Larimer, M.
    Lewis, M.
    Lee, C.
    Kilmer, J.
    Atkins, D.
    Neighbors, C.
    LaBrie, J.
    Walter, T.
    Garberson, L.
    Mirza, T.
    Hummer, J.
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2012, 36 : 355A - 355A
  • [2] COMPARISON OF INJUNCTIVE AND DESCRIPTIVE NORMS FEEDBACK FOR COLLEGE DRINKING PREVENTION
    Larimer, M.
    Lewis, M.
    Lee, C.
    Kilmer, J.
    Atkins, D.
    Neighbors, C.
    LaBrie, J.
    Walter, T.
    Garberson, L.
    Mirza, T.
    Hummer, J.
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2012, 36 : 86A - 86A
  • [3] In lifestyle and prevention, the whole is surely greater than the sum of its parts
    Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Nathalia
    Bano, Arjola
    Franco, Oscar H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (12) : 1615 - 1617
  • [4] The whole is greater than the sum of its parts
    Goldsmith, SJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1996, 37 (05) : 711 - 711
  • [5] The Whole Is Greater Than the Sum of its Parts
    Bamberg, Fabian
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2015, 8 (11) : 1282 - 1284
  • [6] Is the Whole Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts?
    Li, Liangyue
    Tong, Hanghang
    Wang, Yong
    Shi, Conglei
    Cao, Nan
    Buchler, Norbou
    [J]. KDD'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2017, : 295 - 304
  • [7] The whole is greater than the sum of its parts
    Fishel, Rhonda S.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (10) : 2431 - 2432
  • [8] IS THE WHOLE GREATER THAN THE SUM OF ITS PARTS
    HANSON, EH
    [J]. EDUCATION, 1962, 83 (01): : 62 - 62
  • [9] Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts?
    L Andrews
    J Duffy
    [J]. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, 10 (Suppl 2)
  • [10] IS THE WHOLE GREATER THAN THE SUM OF ITS PARTS?
    Gandhi, Ashu R.
    Segal, Jose
    Katz, Paul
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 47 (S1): : 79 - 80