Diagnostic value of WB-DWI versus 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of multiple myeloma

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Bei [1 ]
Zhang, Li [1 ]
Bian, Bingyang [1 ]
Lin, Fang [1 ]
Zhu, Zining [1 ]
Wang, Jiping [1 ]
机构
[1] First Hosp Jilin Univ, Dept Radiol, Changchun, Peoples R China
关键词
F-18-FDG PET/CT; ADC value; diagnosis; imaging; multiple myeloma; WB-DWI; INVOLVEMENT; TOMOGRAPHY; MRI;
D O I
10.4103/ijc.IJC_1129_20
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (WB-DWI) is commonly used for the detection of multiple myeloma (MM). Comparative data on the efficiency of WB-DWI compared with F-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (F-18-FDG PET/CT) to detect MM is limited. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center study of 22 patients with MM enrolled from January 2018 to December 2019. All patients underwent WB-DWI and F-18-FDG PET/CT. Pathological and clinical manifestations, as well as radiologic follow-up, were used for diagnosis. The overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of both methods were compared. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of MM lesions and false-positive lesions were estimated. Results: A total of 214 MM bone lesions were evaluated. There was no significant difference in the accuracy of WB-DWI and PET/CT (86.92 versus 88.32%). Though WB-DWI had a higher sensitivity (99.26% versus84.56%) and PET-CT had a higher specificity (96.10% versus 64.56%), these differences were not statistically significant. There was a statistically significant difference in PPV (83.33% versus 96.64%) and NPV (98.08% versus 77.89%) of WB-DWI and PET/CT, respectively. The ADC value for MM lesions was significantly lower than that for false-positive lesions (P < 0.001). Receiver operating curve analysis showed that the AUC was 0.846, and when the cut-off value was 0.745 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, the sensitivity and specificity were 86.3 and 83.4%, respectively, which distinguished MM lesions from non-MM lesions. Conclusion: WB-DWI and PET-CT scans have similar overall accuracy for detecting MM lesions. The higher PPV of PET-CT and NPV of WB-DWI make them complementary imaging modalities. The ADC value for MM lesions is significantly lower than that for false-positive lesions. An ADC cutoff value of 0.745 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s results in sensitivity and specificity of 86.3 and 83.4%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 309
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma
    Niu, Xiaobo
    JOURNAL OF LABELLED COMPOUNDS & RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS, 2019, 62 : S486 - S487
  • [2] Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Comparison to Bone Scintigraphy, CT and 18F-FDG PET for the Detection of Bone Metastasis
    Liu, Ning-Bo
    Zhu, Lei
    Li, Ming-Huan
    Sun, Xiao-Rong
    Hu, Man
    Huo, Zong-Wei
    Xu, Wen-Gui
    Yu, Jin-Ming
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2013, 14 (06) : 3647 - 3652
  • [3] Diagnostic Value Of 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging In Patients With Multipl Myeloma
    Telci, U.
    Semirgin, S. Ucak
    Sahin, M.
    Basoglu, T.
    Mayis, Ondokuz
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2017, 44 : S733 - S733
  • [4] Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma
    Guo, Yue-Hong
    Liu, Ai-Jun
    Huang, Jing-Wei
    Wang, Li
    Yang, Min-Fu
    ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 2024, 103 (10) : 4145 - 4153
  • [5] WB-DWI MRI Scanning Outperforms FDG PET-CT for the Assessment of Myeloma Disease Burden
    Pawlyn, Charlotte
    Kaiser, Martin F.
    Fowkes, Lucy
    Jones, John R.
    Davies, Faith E.
    Morgan, Gareth J.
    Collins, David
    Sharma, Bhupinder
    Riddell, Angela
    Messiou, Christina
    BLOOD, 2015, 126 (23)
  • [6] Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in infective endocarditis
    Anton-Vazquez, Vanesa
    Cannata, Antonio
    Amin-Youssef, George
    Watson, Samuel
    Fife, Amanda
    Mulholland, Nicola
    Gunning, Margaret
    Papachristids, Alexandros
    MacCarthy, Phil
    Baghai, Max
    Deshpande, Ranjit
    Khan, Habib
    Byrne, Jonathan
    Dworakowski, Rafal
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 111 (06) : 673 - 679
  • [7] Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in infective endocarditis
    Vanesa Anton-Vazquez
    Antonio Cannata
    George Amin-Youssef
    Samuel Watson
    Amanda Fife
    Nicola Mulholland
    Margaret Gunning
    Alexandros Papachristidis
    Phil MacCarthy
    Max Baghai
    Ranjit Deshpande
    Habib Khan
    Jonathan Byrne
    Rafal Dworakowski
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2022, 111 : 673 - 679
  • [8] Diagnostic value of F-18 FDG PET-CT imaging in multiple myeloma
    Canbaz, F.
    Usta, Y.
    Yapici, O.
    Turgut, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 : S697 - S698
  • [9] Differential diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in pulmonary carcinoids versus hamartomas
    Zhao, Juan
    Wang, Huoqiang
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 : S41 - S46
  • [10] 18F-FDG Versus Non-FDG PET Tracers in Multiple Myeloma
    Hemrom, Angel
    Tupalli, Avinash
    Alavi, Abass
    Kumar, Rakesh
    PET CLINICS, 2022, 17 (03) : 415 - 430