Sex as leisure approach during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impacts on the quantity and quality of sex life

被引:1
|
作者
Berdychevsky, Liza [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Recreat Sport & Tourism, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Family Resiliency Ctr, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Ctr Social & Behav Sci, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Ctr Hlth Aging & Disabil, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Hlth Care Engn Syst Ctr, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[6] Univ Illinois, Discovery Partners Inst, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词
COVID-19; pandemic; sex as leisure; sexual behaviour; sexual desire; sexual satisfaction; OF-LIFE; ASSOCIATIONS; SYMPTOMS; TIME;
D O I
10.1080/02614367.2022.2115113
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic has detrimentally affected people's sex lives. The purpose of this research was to study sex as leisure approach during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impacts on the quantity and quality of people's sex lives. The cross-sectional data were collected using an online survey methodology (N = 675). The results show that, on average, the participants' tendency to view sex as leisure has deteriorated during the pandemic, which is a problematic health risk factor because people's capacity to view sex as leisure was positively related to sexual frequency, desire, quality, diversity, intimacy, and satisfaction during the pandemic. People who strongly believed that sex is leisure prior to the pandemic have preserved this view during the pandemic, which contributed to the resilience of their sex lives. All the decreases in the propensity to view sex as leisure happened among people who held a moderate view of sex as leisure before the pandemic. Socio-demographic factors, adjustment to lockdown, and changes in stress levels have also affected people's sex lives during the pandemic. These results demonstrate that a strong(er) tendency to view sex as leisure can serve as a protective factor against the adverse impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on people's sex life.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 513
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sex as Leisure as a Coping Mechanism with the Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Sex Life
    Berdychevsky, Liza
    [J]. LEISURE SCIENCES, 2022,
  • [2] RESILIENCE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND ITS IMPACTS ON SEX LIFE
    Berdychevsky, Liza
    [J]. INNOVATION IN AGING, 2022, 6 : 199 - 199
  • [3] Sexual leisure and profiles of coping with the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on sex life: Using cluster analysis approach
    Berdychevsky, Liza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEISURE RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [4] Roles of travel and leisure in quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Kang, Sung-Eun
    Hwang, YooHee
    Lee, Choong-Ki
    Park, Yae-Na
    [J]. LEISURE STUDIES, 2022, 41 (03) : 326 - 340
  • [5] The Psychological and Quality of Life Impacts on Women in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Hung, Maria Shuk Yu
    Lam, Stanley Kam Ki
    Chan, Liliane Chui King
    Liu, Sisi Pui Shan
    Chow, Meyrick Chum Ming
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (13)
  • [6] Marriage and quality of life during COVID-19 pandemic
    Purba, Fredrick Dermawan
    Kumalasari, Asteria Devy
    Novianti, Langgersari Elsari
    Kendhawati, Lenny
    Noer, Afra Hafny
    Ninin, Retno Hanggarani
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (09):
  • [7] Quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic in Austria
    Dale, Rachel
    Budimir, Sanja
    Probst, Thomas
    Humer, Elke
    Pieh, Christoph
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [8] Biological sex impacts COVID-19 outcomes
    Klein, Sabra L.
    Dhakal, Santosh
    Ursin, Rebecca L.
    Deshpande, Sharvari
    Sandberg, Kathryn
    Mauvais-Jarvis, Franck
    [J]. PLOS PATHOGENS, 2020, 16 (06)
  • [9] Sex and Gender Disparities in the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Gausman, Jewel
    Langer, Ana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2020, 29 (04) : 465 - 466
  • [10] Paying for Sex During COVID-19 Pandemic: The Experiences of Israeli Men
    Prior, Ayelet
    [J]. SEXUALITY RESEARCH AND SOCIAL POLICY, 2022, 19 (01) : 50 - 62