Iterative geostatistical seismic inversion with rock-physics constraints for permeability prediction

被引:6
|
作者
Miele, Roberto [1 ]
Grana, Dario [2 ]
Varella, Luiz Eduardo Seabra [3 ]
Barreto, Bernardo Viola [3 ]
Azevedo, Leonardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, CERENA, DER, Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Wyoming, Sch Energy Resources, Dept Geol & Geophys, Laramie, WY USA
[3] PETROBRAS EXP, GEO, TGEO, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
ELASTIC WAVES; FLUID; PROPAGATION; POROSITY;
D O I
10.1190/geo2022-0352.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Accurate prediction of the spatial distribution of subsurface permeability is a fundamental task in reservoir characterization and monitoring studies for hydrocarbon production and CO2 geologic storage. Predicting permeability over large areas is challenging, due to their high variability and spatial anisotropy. Common approaches for modeling permeability generally involve deterministic calculations from porosity using precali-brated rock-physics models (RPMs) or geostatistical cosimula-tion methods that reproduce observed experimental porosity -permeability relationships. Instead, we have predicted per-meability from seismic data using an iterative geostatistical seis-mic inversion method that combines the advantages of rock -physics and geostatistical modeling methods. First, we simulate facies through 1D vertical Markov chain simulations. Then,permeability, porosity, and acoustic impedance are sequentially generated and conditioned to the previously simulated facies model. An RPM is used to evaluate the misfit between the per-meability predictions obtained from geostatistical cosimulation at the well locations and well-log values computed from the acoustic impedance. The residuals of the misfit function are used as conditioning constraints in the stochastic update of the models in the subsequent iteration. The outcome of our methodology is a set of multiple geostatistical realizations of facies, permeability, porosity, and acoustic impedance condi-tioned to seismic data and constrained by an RPM. We first il-lustrate the method on a synthetic 1D example and compare it to a traditional geostatistical inversion approach. We then apply our inversion to a 3D real data set to assess the methodology performance with scarce conditioning data and in the presence of noise.
引用
收藏
页码:M105 / M117
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Probabilistic seismic inversion based on rock-physics models
    Spikes, Kyle
    Mukerji, Tapan
    Dvorkin, Jack
    Mavko, Gary
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2007, 72 (05) : R87 - R97
  • [2] Improving seismic QP estimation using rock-physics constraints
    Shen Y.
    Dvorkin J.
    Li Y.
    [J]. Geophysics, 2018, 83 (03): : MR187 - MR198
  • [3] Improving seismic QP estimation using rock-physics constraints
    Shen, Yi
    Dvorkin, Jack
    Li, Yunyue
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 83 (03) : MR187 - MR198
  • [4] Bayesian linearized rock-physics inversion
    Grana, Dario
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 81 (06) : D625 - D641
  • [5] Geophysical joint inversion based on mixed structural and rock-physics coupling constraints
    Zhang, Rongzhe
    Li, Tonglin
    Liu, Cai
    He, Haoyuan
    Huang, Xingguo
    Vatankah, Saeed
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2023, 88 (02) : K27 - K37
  • [6] Rock-physics and seismic-inversion based reservoir characterization of the Haynesville Shale
    Jiang, Meijuan
    Spikes, Kyle T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 13 (03) : 220 - 233
  • [7] Geostatistical rock physics AVA inversion
    Azevedo, Leonardo
    Grana, Dario
    Amaro, Catarina
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 216 (03) : 1728 - 1739
  • [8] Rock-physics templates based on seismic Q
    Picotti, Stefano
    Carcione, Jose M.
    Ba, Jing
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 84 (01) : MR13 - MR23
  • [9] Rock-physics templates based on seismic Q
    Picotti S.
    Carcione J.M.
    Ba J.
    [J]. Geophysics, 2019, 84 (01): : MR13 - MR23
  • [10] Probabilistic seismic inversion for reservoir fracture and petrophysical parameters driven by rock-physics models
    Pan XinPeng
    Zhang GuangZhi
    Yin XingYao
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2018, 61 (02): : 683 - 696