Threshold effects of green technology application on sustainable grain production: Evidence from China

被引:20
|
作者
Li, Jingdong [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Qingning [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Reg Sustainable Dev Modeling, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Econ & Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
green technology; grain production; green total factor productivity; influence mechanism; threshold effects; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; RICE PRODUCTION; DEEP PLACEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATIONS; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; NITROGEN-FERTILIZER; AGRICULTURAL SECTOR; CARBON EMISSIONS; STRAW RETURN; YIELD;
D O I
10.3389/fpls.2023.1107970
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Sustainable production is considered as an important approach to solve the dilemma of food insecurity. Green technologies have made contributions to improving food production and reducing environmental pollution. Studying the effects of green technologies on sustainable food production has great significance. The paper started with the influence mechanism of green technology application on the green total factor productivity of grain (GTFPG). With the GTFPG, green technology efficiency change of grain (GECG) and green technical progress change of grain (GTCG) measured, threshold models were constructed to explore the nonlinear impacts of various green technologies on GTFPG and the influence paths. Results indicated that the differences of GTFPG among provinces in China were decreased mainly due to the changes of GTCG, while the regional differences of GECG remained small. The impacts of green technologies had threshold effects that depended on the ecological effects of green technologies in different application stages, and were significantly different in the major and non-major grain producing areas. Meanwhile, significant differences existed in the influence paths of green technologies. In the major grain producing areas, green technologies were more likely to improve GTFPG through the GTCG path; while in the non-major grain producing areas, the GECG path and the GTCG path were both important to improve GTFPG. The differences of green technologies' threshold effects and influence paths in the major and non-major grain producing areas were caused by regional technology preference, resource endowment and technology compatibility. This study emphasizes that the development of green technologies should fully consider the resource endowment and economic development of different regions, as well as the applicability and adoption rate of green technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nonlinear Effects of Agricultural Technology on Sustainable Grain Production in China
    Chen, Bizhen
    Sun, Dehong
    [J]. PROBLEMY EKOROZWOJU, 2024, 19 (02): : 91 - 105
  • [2] Does seed industry innovation in developing countries contribute to sustainable development of grain green production? Evidence from China
    Gong, Siyu
    Wang, Bo
    Yu, Zhigang
    Cui, Zhaoda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 406
  • [3] Carbon reduction effect of agricultural green production technology: A new evidence from China
    Guo, Zhangdong
    Zhang, Xiaoning
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 874
  • [4] Taoism and green technology innovation: evidence from China
    Chen, Xiaohui
    Zhang, Hongwei
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2023,
  • [5] The role of farmers' green values in creation of green innovative intention and green technology adoption behavior: Evidence from farmers grain green production
    Gao, Risheng
    Zhang, Haitao
    Gong, Chunming
    Wu, Zhihua
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [6] Impact of Green Technology Innovation on Green Economy: Evidence from China
    Wang, Chenggang
    Du, Danli
    Liu, Tiansen
    Zhu, Yue
    Yang, Dongxue
    Huang, Yuan
    Meng, Fan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (19)
  • [7] Investigating the Impact of Grain Subsidy Policy on Farmers' Green Production Behavior: Recent Evidence from China
    Pan, Shilei
    Di, Chenhui
    Chandio, Abbas Ali
    Sargani, Ghulam Raza
    Zhang, Huaquan
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [8] Asymmetric effects of heterogeneous environmental standards on green technology innovation: Evidence from China
    Xu, Le
    Yang, Lili
    Li, Ding
    Shao, Shuai
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 117
  • [9] Green Production Management and Innovation Nexus: Evidence from Technology-Based SMEs of China
    Zhou, Lianjie
    Dai, Yuhui
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [10] Impact and threshold effect of Internet technology upgrade on forestry green total factor productivity: Evidence from China
    Wu, Lin
    Zhang, Zhiguang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 271