Interpretable high-stakes decision support system for credit default forecasting

被引:2
|
作者
Sun, Weixin [1 ]
Zhang, Xuantao [2 ]
Li, Minghao [1 ]
Wang, Yong [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Dongbei Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat, Dalian 116023, Peoples R China
[2] Dongbei Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Dalian 116023, Peoples R China
[3] Dalian Municipal Res Inst Publ Hlth, Dalian 116037, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
High-stakes decision forecasting; Credit default forecasting; Interpretable machine learning; Imbalanced datasets; Resampling methods; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122825
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Methods for forecasting credit default have long been research focus for financial institutions. In this study, we propose an interpretable high-stakes decision support system for credit default forecasting called CDFS. Because of the high-stake nature of credit default prediction, the proposed CDFS adheres to the principle of "people in the loop." The proposed CDFS comprises six modules: data processing, feature selection, data balancing, forecasting, evaluation, and interpretation. A feature selection method (permutation importance method), nine resampling methods, and six high-performance forecasting methods were employed in the proposed CDFS. The China Taiwan credit card default dataset and South Germany credit dataset were used to test the interpretability and predictive performance of the proposed CDFS. Experiments showed that the feature selection and data balancing modules of the CDFS effectively improve the prediction performance. A comparison with traditional logistic regression models demonstrated that the CDFS can provide decision-makers with satisfactory explanations for prediction results. In summary, the CDFS proposed in this study exhibited excellent predictive performance and satisfactory interpretability. This study contributes to improving the accuracy of credit default forecasting and reducing credit risk in financial institutions.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-stakes testing and the default philosophy of education
    Gunzenhauser, MG
    THEORY INTO PRACTICE, 2003, 42 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [2] It's Easy to Play Defense with Such a High-Stakes Decision
    Alziari, Lucien
    HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 2022, 100 (1-2) : 20 - 21
  • [3] Introduction to high-stakes IS risk and decision-making minitrack
    Port, Dan
    Wilf, Joel
    Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2019, 2019-January
  • [4] THE SCIENCE OF CHOOSING THE RIGHT DECISION THRESHOLD IN HIGH-STAKES DIAGNOSTICS
    SWETS, JA
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1992, 47 (04) : 522 - 532
  • [5] Introduction to High-Stakes IS Risk and Decision-Making Minitrack
    Port, Dan
    Wilf, Joel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 52ND ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2019, : 7352 - 7352
  • [6] Put to the Test Understanding Differences in Support for High-Stakes Testing
    Lay, J. Celeste
    Stokes-Brown, Atiya Kai
    AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2009, 37 (03) : 429 - 448
  • [7] Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Making
    Veale, Michael
    Van Kleek, Max
    Binns, Reuben
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2018), 2018,
  • [8] Sibyl: Explaining Machine Learning Models for High-Stakes Decision Making
    Zytek, Alexandra
    Liu, Dongyu
    Vaithianathan, Rhema
    Veeramachaneni, Kalyan
    EXTENDED ABSTRACTS OF THE 2021 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI'21), 2021,
  • [9] Rater Training to Support High-Stakes Simulation-Based Assessments
    Feldman, Moshe
    Lazzara, Elizabeth H.
    Vanderbilt, Allison A.
    DiazGranados, Deborah
    JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2012, 32 (04) : 279 - 286
  • [10] High-stakes examination policies and transformation of the Turkish education system
    Caner, H. Ayse
    Bayhan, Sezen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 79