The role of transport infrastructure in economic growth: Empirical evidence in the UK

被引:22
|
作者
Zhang, Yijia [1 ]
Cheng, Lu [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Management, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] UCL, Bartlett Sch Sustainable Construct, London WC1E 7HB, England
关键词
Transport infrastructure; Economic growth; VECM; Granger causality test; PRODUCTIVITY; HIGHWAY; EUROPE; IMPACT; INDIA; AGGLOMERATION; PERFORMANCE; CONSUMPTION; INDUSTRIAL; PROJECT;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.01.017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since 2015, the United Kingdom (UK) has increased its investment in transportation infrastructure to compensate for years of underinvestment in comparison with peer countries. It is of critical importance to evaluate the effect of these recent investments, as well as historical ones, on economic development, both theoretically and empirically, to provide guidance on future infrastructure investment. However, few research looks into such policy adjustment on economic growth in the UK. To fill this gap, this paper investigates the relationship between transport infrastructure development and economic growth in the UK from different time spans. Principal component analysis (PCA) is used to construct a comprehensive measure of transport infrastructure development. This paper then applies Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) to investigate both long-run and short-run relationships between transport infrastructure development and economic growth from 1970 to 2017 in the UK. Empirical results suggest that transportation infrastructure has a long-run promotive effect on economic development. However, in the short run, this effect turns out to be significantly negative. The analysis of this paper indicates differentiated roles that the UK's transport infrastructure played in economic growth, which should be considered in future policy design of achieving economic sustainability in the UK.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 233
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Empirical Analysis on the Relationship between Transport Infrastructure and Economic Growth in Tianjin
    Meng, Xiaozhe
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE, PTS 1-3, 2013, 253-255 : 278 - 281
  • [2] Transport infrastructure and regional economic growth: evidence from China
    Hong, Junjie
    Chu, Zhaofang
    Wang, Qiang
    TRANSPORTATION, 2011, 38 (05) : 737 - 752
  • [3] Transport infrastructure and regional economic growth: evidence from China
    Junjie Hong
    Zhaofang Chu
    Qiang Wang
    Transportation, 2011, 38 : 737 - 752
  • [4] The role of public and private transport infrastructure capital in economic growth. Evidence from Pakistan
    Batool, Irem
    Goldmann, Kathrin
    RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS, 2021, 88
  • [5] The Impact of Logistics and Infrastructure on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam
    Chi Dieu Thi Nguyen
    Bao Thai Luong
    Huong Lan Thi Hoang
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2021, 8 (06): : 21 - 28
  • [6] The impact of transportation infrastructure on economic growth: empirical evidence from Pakistan
    Mohmand, Yasir Tariq
    Wang, Aihu
    Saeed, Abubakr
    TRANSPORTATION LETTERS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 2017, 9 (02): : 63 - 69
  • [7] Empirical Evidence from EU-28 Countries on Resilient Transport Infrastructure Systems and Sustainable Economic Growth
    Gherghina, Stefan Cristian
    Onofrei, Mihaela
    Vintila, Georgeta
    Armeanu, Daniel Stefan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (08)
  • [8] Globalization and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence on the Role of Complementarities
    Samimi, Parisa
    Jenatabadi, Hashem Salarzadeh
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04):
  • [9] Transport infrastructure, spatial spillover and economic growth: Evidence from China
    Zhang, Xueliang
    FRONTIERS OF ECONOMICS IN CHINA, 2008, 3 (04) : 585 - 597
  • [10] Do transport infrastructure spillovers matter for economic growth? Evidence on road and railway transport infrastructure in Iranian provinces
    Shabani, Zahra Dehghan
    Safaie, Sima
    REGIONAL SCIENCE POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2018, 10 (01): : 49 - 63