A comparative life cycle assessment of recycling waste concrete powder into CO2-Capture products

被引:5
|
作者
Kravchenko, Ekaterina [1 ]
Sauerwein, Meike [2 ]
Besklubova, Svetlana [3 ]
Ng, Charles Wang Wai [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Speci, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Div Environm & Sustainabil, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Speci, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Ind & Mfg Syst Engn, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Speci, Peoples R China
关键词
Waste concrete powder; Carbon dioxide emission; Environmental impact; Carbon footprint; Life cycle assessment; PORTLAND-CEMENT; MICROSTRUCTURE; CONSUMPTION; CARBONATION; HYDRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119947
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Waste concrete powder (WCP), a byproduct of construction and demolition (C&D), currently has a low degree of recycling despite its potential for environmentally friendly applications. WCP can serve as a valuable substitute for cement, offering advantages for resource conservation and carbon sequestration. However, there are very few studies that quantitatively assess the environmental impact of incorporating WCP into the circular economy as a secondary material instead of disposing of it. The energy-intensive processing of WCP raises questions about the optimal carbonation time using available equipment. This study aims to fill this knowledge gap by employing carbon footprint and life cycle assessments (LCA) to optimize WCP recycling. Three recycling WCP scenarios are analyzed. The first scenario involved the conversion of WCP into compacts that absorb CO2 during the carbonation process. The results of the first scenario revealed that the optimal carbonation time for WCP compacts was 8 h, during which 42.7 kg CO2-e per tonne of WCP compacts was sequestered. The total global warming potential (GWP) was -4.22 kgCO2-e, indicating a carbon-negative recycling process. In the second and third scenarios, LCA was conducted to compare the use of carbonated and uncarbonated WCP as a partial replacement for cement in concrete. In these scenarios, it was found that uncarbonated WCP is a more effective solution for reducing the carbon footprint of traditional concrete mixes, achieving a significant 16% reduction of GWP when 20% of cement is replaced. Conversely, using carbonated WCP as a partial cement replacement in concrete mixtures shows limited potential for CO2 uptake. The sensitivity analysis reveals that the carbon footprint of the WCP compacts production process is strongly influenced by the electricity supplier used.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of concrete incorporating all concrete recycling products
    Dacić, Amina
    Mester-Szabó, Eszter
    Fenyvesi, Olivér
    Szalay, Zsuzsa
    [J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2024, 21
  • [2] Discrepancies in life cycle assessment applied to concrete waste recycling: A structured review
    Liu, Xiaoyi
    Asghari, Vahid
    Lam, Chor-Man
    Hsu, Shu-Chien
    Xuan, Dongxing
    Angulo, Sergio Cirelli
    John, Vanderley M.
    Basavaraj, Anusha S.
    Gettu, Ravindra
    Xiao, Jianzhuang
    Poon, Chi-Sun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [3] Environmental impacts of three waste concrete recycling strategies for prefabricated components through comparative life cycle assessment
    Jian, Si-Min
    Wu, Bo
    Hu, Nan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 328
  • [4] Recycling waste-derived marble powder for CO2 capture
    Nawar, Azra
    Ghaedi, Hosein
    Ali, Majid
    Zhao, Ming
    Iqbal, Naseem
    Khan, Rashid
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2019, 132 : 214 - 225
  • [5] Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of waste mobile phone recycling in China
    Bian, Jinghong
    Bai, Hongtao
    Li, Wenchao
    Yin, Jianfeng
    Xu, He
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 131 : 209 - 218
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of material footprint in recycling: A case of concrete recycling
    Zhang, Chunbo
    Hu, Mingming
    van der Meide, Marc
    Di Maio, Francesco
    Yang, Xining
    Gao, Xiaofeng
    Li, Kai
    Zhao, Hailong
    Li, Chen
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 155 : 311 - 319
  • [7] A Waste Recycling Method Based on the Life Cycle Analysis of Products
    Yu, Longfei
    Zhu, Shifan
    [J]. MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 2022
  • [8] Screening Life Cycle Analysis of Post Combustion CO2-Capture Technologies - A Comparison of Construction Phase Results
    Troy, Stefanie V.
    Wagner, Hermann-Josef
    [J]. 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 480 - 487
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of waste tire recycling: Upgraded pyrolytic products for new tire production
    Wu, Qijing
    Zhang, Qianqian
    Chen, Xiaoyan
    Song, Guohui
    Xiao, Jun
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 46 : 294 - 309
  • [10] Comparative life cycle assessment to maximize CO2 sequestration of steel slag products
    Li, Lufan
    Jiang, Yi
    Pan, Shu-Yuan
    Ling, Tung-Chai
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2021, 298