The comparison of the efficacy and safety of fractional 1064 nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser and nonablative fractional 1565 nm laser in the treatment of enlarged pores: A prospective split-face study

被引:4
|
作者
Qian, Chunyan [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Yueqi [1 ]
Wu, Yuemeng [1 ]
Yue, Baishuang [1 ]
Yan, Shuxian [1 ]
Lu, Zhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Shanghai Med Coll, Shanghai Inst Dermatol,Dept Dermatol, 12 Wulumuqi Rd, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Suzhou Sci & Technol Town Hosp, Gusu Sch, Dept Dermatol, Suzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
enlarged pores; fractional laser; nonablative laser; pico-second laser; sebum secretion; treatment; DIFFRACTIVE LENS ARRAY; ALEXANDRITE LASER; SKIN PORES; WAVELENGTH;
D O I
10.1002/lsm.23635
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background and ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy and safety of fractional 1064 nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser and nonablative fractional 1565 nm laser in the treatment of enlarged pores. Study Design/Materials and MethodsTwenty patients received five monthly treatments at months 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 and were followed up at months 5, 6, and 7. All patients were treated by fractional 1064 nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser (FxPico) on the left face, and nonablative fractional 1565 nm laser (ResurFx) on the right face as a control. ResultsFor the 19 patients who completed the study, both sides demonstrated significant improvement on pore counts (p < 0.01), while there was no significant difference between the two sides 3 months after the final treatment (p = 0.092). Excellence rate on the FxPico side (57.9%) was significantly better than the ResurFx side (36.8%) (p < 0.05). Sebum secretion and porphyrin value significantly decreased on both sides after five treatments and there was a higher reduction of sebum level on the ResurFx side. There was no difference between the two therapies in terms of overall satisfaction. Pain of treatment for the ResurFx side (average VAS 4.45 +/- 1.60) is significantly higher than that for the FxPico side (average visual analog scale [VAS] 1.48 +/- 1.36) (p < 0.001). Erythema, edema, and petechiae were common adverse effects and were mild to moderate. There was significantly higher incidence of hyperpigmentation for the ResurFx side (52.6%) compared with that for the FxPico side (5.3%) (p < 0.001). ConclusionFractional 1064 nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser and nonablative fractional 1565 nm laser both are effective, efficient, and safe treatment regimens for enlarged pores, while fractional 1064 nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser has better clinical response with less treatment pain, shorter recovery period and much lower induction of hyperpigmentation.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 177
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized split-face, controlled comparison of treatment with 1565-nm nonablative fractional laser for enlarged facial pores
    Yu, W.
    Zhu, J.
    Ma, G.
    Yang, J.
    Qiu, Y.
    Chen, Y.
    Chen, H.
    Jin, Y.
    Yang, X.
    Hu, X.
    Wang, T.
    Chang, L.
    Lin, X.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 178 (04) : E271 - E272
  • [2] Comparison of the 1064-nm picosecond laser with fractionated microlens array and 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser for the treatment of enlarged pores: a randomized, split-face, controlled trial
    Xing Liu
    Rong Zeng
    Yuzhen Liu
    Lifang Guo
    Mengli Zhang
    Huiying Zheng
    Qiuju Wu
    Yiping Ge
    Tong Lin
    [J]. Lasers in Medical Science, 39
  • [3] Comparison of the 1064-nm picosecond laser with fractionated microlens array and 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser for the treatment of enlarged pores: a randomized, split-face, controlled trial
    Liu, Xing
    Zeng, Rong
    Liu, Yuzhen
    Guo, Lifang
    Zhang, Mengli
    Zheng, Huiying
    Wu, Qiuju
    Ge, Yiping
    Lin, Tong
    [J]. LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 39 (01)
  • [4] The Efficacy and Safety of Fractional 1064 nm Nd:YAG Picosecond Laser Combined With Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scar: A Split-Face Study
    Feng, Hao
    Wu, Yuemeng
    Jiang, Min
    Luo, Xiaoqun
    Yan, Shuxian
    Lu, Zhong
    [J]. LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2021, 53 (10) : 1356 - 1363
  • [5] The efficacy and safety of low- versus high-fluence fractional picosecond Nd:YAG 1064-nm laser in the treatment of acne scars: A randomized split-face comparison study
    Lee, Si-Hyung
    Kim, Dong Hyo
    Jo, Seong Jin
    Lim, Youngkyoung
    Lee, Ji Won
    Lee, Jun Hyo
    Kim, Tae Min
    Kim, Seong Rae
    Kang, Jeewoo
    Yoon, Ji Young
    Suh, Dae Hun
    [J]. PHOTODERMATOLOGY PHOTOIMMUNOLOGY & PHOTOMEDICINE, 2024, 40 (01)
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser versus long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser in treating enlarged facial pores
    Ying Wang
    Yuxin Zheng
    Suiqing Cai
    [J]. Lasers in Medical Science, 2022, 37 : 3279 - 3284
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser versus long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser in treating enlarged facial pores
    Wang, Ying
    Zheng, Yuxin
    Cai, Suiqing
    [J]. LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 37 (08) : 3279 - 3284
  • [8] Comparison of the fractionated Nd: YAG 1064-nm picosecond laser with holographic optics and the fractional CO2 laser in atrophic acne scar treatment: a prospective, randomized, split-face study
    Yuan, Yucheng
    He, Yizhen
    Fang, Jing
    Zhang, Mengli
    Wu, Qiuju
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2024,
  • [9] A RANDOMIZED, SPLIT-FACE CLINICAL TRIAL OF THE PICOSECOND FRACTIONAL 1064/523nm Nd: YAG LASER VS THE 1927nm NON-ABLATIVE FRACTIONAL LASER FOR THE TREATMENT OF FACIAL PHOTODAMAGE
    Wu, Douglas
    Goldman, Mitchel P.
    [J]. LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2019, 51 : S28 - S29
  • [10] Split-face comparison of the picosecond 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser using a microlens array and the quasi-long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for treatment of photoaging facial wrinkles and pores in Asians
    Yim, Sunmin
    Lee, Yun Ho
    Choi, Young-Jun
    Kim, Won-Serk
    [J]. LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 35 (04) : 949 - 956