Design of effective outpatient sentinel surveillance for COVID-19 decision-making: a modeling study

被引:2
|
作者
Toh, Kok Ben [1 ]
Runge, Manuela [1 ]
Richardson, Reese A. K. [2 ]
Hladish, Thomas J. [3 ,4 ]
Gerardin, Jaline [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Inst Global Hlth, Dept Prevent Med, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Biol, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, Emerging Pathogen Inst, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
COVID-19; Surveillance; Modeling; Public health indicators; CLOSE CONTACTS; TRANSMISSION; VARIANT; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1186/s12879-023-08261-5
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
BackgroundDecision-makers impose COVID-19 mitigations based on public health indicators such as reported cases, which are sensitive to fluctuations in supply and demand for diagnostic testing, and hospital admissions, which lag infections by up to two weeks. Imposing mitigations too early has unnecessary economic costs while imposing too late leads to uncontrolled epidemics with unnecessary cases and deaths. Sentinel surveillance of recently-symptomatic individuals in outpatient testing sites may overcome biases and lags in conventional indicators, but the minimal outpatient sentinel surveillance system needed for reliable trend estimation remains unknown.MethodsWe used a stochastic, compartmental transmission model to evaluate the performance of various surveillance indicators at reliably triggering an alarm in response to, but not before, a step increase in transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The surveillance indicators included hospital admissions, hospital occupancy, and sentinel cases with varying levels of sampling effort capturing 5, 10, 20, 50, or 100% of incident mild cases. We tested 3 levels of transmission increase, 3 population sizes, and conditions of either simultaneous transmission increase or lagged increase in the older population. We compared the indicators' performance at triggering alarm soon after, but not prior, to the transmission increase.ResultsCompared to surveillance based on hospital admissions, outpatient sentinel surveillance that captured at least 20% of incident mild cases could trigger an alarm 2 to 5 days earlier for a mild increase in transmission and 6 days earlier for a moderate or strong increase. Sentinel surveillance triggered fewer false alarms and averted more deaths per day spent in mitigation. When transmission increase in older populations lagged the increase in younger populations by 14 days, sentinel surveillance extended its lead time over hospital admissions by an additional 2 days.ConclusionsSentinel surveillance of mild symptomatic cases can provide more timely and reliable information on changes in transmission to inform decision-makers in an epidemic like COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Design of effective outpatient sentinel surveillance for COVID-19 decision-making: a modeling study
    Kok Ben Toh
    Manuela Runge
    Reese AK Richardson
    Thomas J Hladish
    Jaline Gerardin
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 23
  • [2] Decision-Making in COVID-19 and Frailty
    Moug, Susan
    Carter, Ben
    Myint, Phyo Kyaw
    Hewitt, Jonathan
    McCarthy, Kathryn
    Pearce, Lyndsay
    GERIATRICS, 2020, 5 (02)
  • [3] COVID-19: decision-making in public health
    de Caestecker, Linda
    von Wissmann, Beatrix
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF EDINBURGH, 2021, 51 : S26 - S32
  • [4] COVID-19 AND FAMILY LAW DECISION-MAKING
    Freckelton, Ian
    JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE, 2020, 27 (04) : 846 - 855
  • [5] Effective decision-making in public health organizations: reference to the COVID-19 pandemic
    Liem, Jessica
    Thongpapanl, Narongsak
    Faught, Brent E.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 39 (02) : 159 - 179
  • [6] CoVid-19 Pandemic Trend Modeling and Analysis to Support Resilience Decision-Making
    Duffey, Romney B.
    Zio, Enrico
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2020, 9 (07): : 1 - 13
  • [7] Organizational decision-making during COVID-19: A qualitative analysis of the organizational decision-making system in the United States during COVID-19
    Johnson, Karl
    Biddell, Caitlin B. B.
    Hecht, Hillary K. K.
    Lich, Kristen H. H.
    Swann, Julie
    Delamater, Paul
    Mayorga, Maria
    Ivy, Julie
    Smith, Raymond L. L.
    Patel, Mehul D. D.
    JOURNAL OF CONTINGENCIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT, 2023, 31 (02) : 259 - 272
  • [8] Resident Perspectives on COVID-19 in Psychiatric Decision-Making
    Gallop, Amy
    Graczyk, Matthew R.
    ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 44 (06) : 685 - 686
  • [9] COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy: ambiguity in decision-making
    Jones, Emma
    Neely, Eva
    HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 38 (06)
  • [10] To Vaccinate or Not? Decision-Making in the Time of COVID-19 Vaccines
    Groenewald, Candice
    CULTURAL STUDIES-CRITICAL METHODOLOGIES, 2022, 22 (01): : 89 - 95