The impact of encoding-retrieval perceptual differences on the retrieval-divided attention effect

被引:0
|
作者
Lin, Xin [1 ]
Wu, Mei [2 ]
Meng, Yingfang [1 ]
Zheng, Siqi [3 ]
Huang, Fajie [4 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Inst Educ, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Med Univ, Sch Hlth, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Implicit memory; Retrieval-DA effect; Perceptual inconsistency; MEMORY; EXPLICIT;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-024-05850-8
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous research has identified asymmetry between implicit encoding and retrieval processes, wherein the priming effect is disrupted by retrieval interference, termed the 'retrieval divided attention (retrieval-DA) effect'. Additionally, numerous studies have indicated that the priming effect is sensitive to variations in the presentation format of stimuli between the encoding and retrieval phases. Given this context, the current study investigated the origins of the 'retrieval-DA effect' by manipulating the perceptual presentation of stimuli. We employed a dual-task paradigm, utilizing an odd-even decision task as the distractor task and a lexical decision task as the memory task. Results from Experiment 1 revealed the presence of the 'retrieval-DA effect' when the dual task was executed during retrieval, irrespective of the consistency of stimuli between the encoding and retrieval phases. In Experiment 2, by intensifying the disparity in stimuli presentation between encoding and retrieval through positional adjustments of the distracting stimulus, we observed that the retrieval-DA effect persisted even amidst heightened perceptual inconsistency. We propose that the retrieval-DA effect on implicit memory arises from competition for attentional resources elicited by dual-task operations, rather than the perceptual disparities in stimuli presentation between encoding and retrieval.
引用
收藏
页码:20496 / 20504
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of divided attention at encoding on neural processing at retrieval
    Corkin, S
    Kensinger, E
    Clarke, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, : 111 - 112
  • [2] Divided attention and the encoding effects of retrieval
    Buchin, Zachary L.
    Mulligan, Neil W.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 72 (10): : 2474 - 2494
  • [3] ENCODING AND RETRIEVAL DEFICITS IN DIVIDED ATTENTION
    HESS, TM
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 1980, 20 (05): : 124 - 124
  • [4] The encoding-retrieval relationship: retrieval as mental simulation
    Kent, Christopher
    Lamberts, Koen
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2008, 12 (03) : 92 - 98
  • [5] The myth of the encoding-retrieval match
    Nairne, JS
    [J]. MEMORY, 2002, 10 (5-6) : 389 - 395
  • [6] Effects of divided attention on memory encoding and retrieval
    Craik, F
    Naveh-Benjamin, M
    Guez, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 39 (5-6) : 348 - 348
  • [7] The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: The resiliency of retrieval processes
    Naveh-Benjamin, M
    Craik, FIM
    Perretta, JG
    Tonev, ST
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 53 (03): : 609 - 625
  • [8] Testing the myth of the encoding-retrieval match
    Goh, Winston D.
    Lu, Sharon H. X.
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2012, 40 (01) : 28 - 39
  • [9] Effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval: Further data
    Fergus I. M. Craik
    Eldar Eftekhari
    Malcolm A. Binns
    [J]. Memory & Cognition, 2018, 46 : 1263 - 1277
  • [10] Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval
    Weeks, Jennifer C.
    Hasher, Lynn
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2017, 24 (04) : 1268 - 1273