On Conversational Implicature and Conventional Implicature

被引:0
|
作者
任方宁 [1 ]
机构
[1] 北京语言大学英语学院
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
H030 [语义学、语用学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
In daily communication, people often intend to convey more than the words they literally utter. The literal, semantic meaning of a sentence can be enriched by its implicit and pragmatic meanings. The term implicature refers to an interpretation of what a speaker didn’t explicitly say but intended to say. Two broad categories of implicatures can be distinguished. On the one hand, there are conversational implicatures of which the scalar implicature is the most widely investigated subtype. On the other hand, there are conventional implicatures which have rarely been experimentally investigated. This paper discusses both types of implicatures from the perspectives of their similarities and differences.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 178+180
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] 含义分类标准评析
    熊学亮
    [J]. 外语教学与研究, 1997, (02) : 2 - 8+81
  • [2] Levinson,Stephen C.Pragmatics. . 1983
  • [3] Grice H P.Logic and conversation. Syntax&Semantics . 1967
  • [4] Kempson R M.Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics. . 1977
  • [5] 规约含义的哲学溯源与争鸣
    冯光武
    [J]. 现代外语, 2008, (02) : 194 - 202
  • [6] Anna Papafragou,Julien Musolino.  Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface[J]. Cognition . 2002 (3)
  • [7] Janssens L.Some implicatures are conversational,but others are conventional:a developmental implicature study. . 2014
  • [8] Potts C.The logic of conventional implicature. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology . 2005
  • [9] 规约含义与会话含义考辨
    王家年
    [J]. 浙江外国语学院学报, 2014, (06) : 1 - 7
  • [10] Gazdar,Gerald.Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. . 1979