Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients

被引:0
|
作者
Shoichi Fujii [1 ]
Mitsuo Tsukamoto [1 ]
Yoshihisa Fukushima [1 ]
Ryu Shimada [1 ]
Koichi Okamoto [1 ]
Takeshi Tsuchiya [1 ]
Keijiro Nozawa [1 ]
Keiji Matsuda [1 ]
Yojiro Hashiguchi [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine
关键词
Laparoscopic surgery; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Colorectal cancer; Elderly patient;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.34 [];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
AIM: To verify the safety and validity of laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer in elderly patients.METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed of a systematic search of studies on an electronic database. Studies that compared laparoscopic colectomy(LAC) in elderly colorectal cancer patients with open colectomy(OC) were retrieved, and their short and long-term outcomes compared. Elderly people were defined as 65 years old or more. Inclusion criteria were set at: Resection of colorectal cancer, comparison between laparoscopic and OC and no significant difference in backgrounds between groups.RESULTS: Fifteen studies were identified for analysis. LAC was performed on 1436 patients, and OC performed on 1810 patients. In analyses of short-term outcomes, operation time for LAC was longer than for OC(mean difference = 34.4162, 95%CI: 17.8473-50.9851, P < 0.0001). The following clinical parameters were lower in LAC than in OC: Amount of estimated blood loss(mean difference =-93.3738, 95%CI:-132.3437 to-54.4039, P < 0.0001), overall morbidity(OR = 0.5427, 95%CI: 0.4425-0.6655, P < 0.0001), incisional surgical site infection(OR = 0.6262, 95%CI: 0.4310-0.9097, P = 0.0140), bowel obstruction and ileus(OR = 0.6248, 95%CI: 0.4519-0.8638, P = 0.0044) and cardiovascular complications(OR = 0.4767, 95%CI: 0.2805-0.8101, P = 0.0062). In analyses of long-term outcomes(median follow-up period: 36.4 mo in LAC, 34.3 mo in OC), there was no significant difference in overall survival(mean difference = 0.8321, 95%CI: 0.5331-1.2990, P = 0.4187) and disease specific survival(mean difference = 1.0254, 95%CI: 0.6707-1.5675, P = 0.9209). There was also no significant difference in the number of dissected lymph nodes(mean difference =-0.1360, 95%CI:-4.0553-3.7833, P = 0.9458).CONCLUSION: LAC in elderly colorectal cancer patients had benefits in short-term outcomes compared with OC except operation time. The long-term outcomes and oncological clearance of LAC were similar to that of OC. These results support the assertion that LAC is an effective procedure for elderly patients with colorectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 582
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients
    Fujii, Shoichi
    Tsukamoto, Mitsuo
    Fukushima, Yoshihisa
    Shimada, Ryu
    Okamoto, Koichi
    Tsuchiya, Takeshi
    Nozawa, Keijiro
    Matsuda, Keiji
    Hashiguchi, Yojiro
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 8 (07) : 573 - 582
  • [2] Colorectal cancer surgery in the very elderly patient: a systematic review of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection
    Devoto, Laurence
    Celentano, Valerio
    Cohen, Richard
    Khan, Jim
    Chand, Manish
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (09) : 1237 - 1242
  • [3] Colorectal cancer surgery in the very elderly patient: a systematic review of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection
    Laurence Devoto
    Valerio Celentano
    Richard Cohen
    Jim Khan
    Manish Chand
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2017, 32 : 1237 - 1242
  • [4] Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer
    Reza, M. M.
    Blasco, J. A.
    Andradas, E.
    Cantero, R.
    Mayol, J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (08) : 921 - 928
  • [5] Laparoscopic vs open Surgery in colorectal Cancer
    Reibetanz, J.
    Germer, C. -T.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2013, 84 (03): : 234 - 234
  • [6] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for elderly patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of matched studies
    Luo, Weimin
    Wu, Mengyuan
    Chen, Yanling
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 92 (09) : 2003 - 2017
  • [7] Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review
    Simmonds, P
    Best, L
    Baughan, C
    Buchanan, R
    Davis, C
    Fentiman, I
    George, S
    Gosney, M
    Northover, J
    Williams, C
    Amato, A
    Arbman, G
    Arenal, JJ
    Barillari, P
    Benhamiche-Bouvier, AM
    Bjerkeset, T
    Braun, L
    Carlsen, E
    Coco, C
    Fielding, LP
    Franklin, ME
    Hermanek, P
    de la Fuente, FH
    Hohenberger, W
    Kingston, RD
    Komborozos, VA
    Lau, WY
    Marks, CG
    Navarro-Pomares, A
    Pigot, F
    Carraro, PS
    Smith, J
    Stamatakis, JD
    Sugihara, K
    Tagliacozzo, S
    Tartter, P
    Verschueren, RCJ
    Violi, V
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 (9234): : 968 - 974
  • [8] Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery for elderly patients
    Murata, K.
    Tomimaru, Y.
    Ide, Y.
    Okada, K.
    Ohta, H.
    Maruyama, K.
    Yokouchi, H.
    Kinuta, M.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (05) : 730 - 731
  • [9] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the older person: A systematic review
    Moug, S. J.
    McCarthy, K.
    Coode-Bate, J.
    Stechman, M. J.
    Hewitt, J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2015, 4 (03): : 311 - 318
  • [10] Is laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Beneficial for Elderly Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Seishima, Ryo
    Okabayashi, Koji
    Hasegawa, Hirotoshi
    Tsuruta, Masashi
    Shigeta, Kohei
    Matsui, Shimpei
    Yamada, Toru
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (04) : 756 - 765