Identifying grey-rhino in eminent technologies via patent analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Shelia X.Wei [1 ,2 ]
Helena H.Zhang [3 ]
Howell Y.Wang [1 ,2 ]
Fred Y.Ye [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] School of Information Management, Nanjing University
[2] International Joint Informatics Laboratory, Nanjing University
[3] School of Cultural Heritage and Information Management, Shanghai University
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G255.53 [专利];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose: Following the typical features of the grey-rhino event as predictability and profound influence, we attempt to find a special pattern called the grey-rhino in eminent technologies via patent analysis.Design/methodology/approach: We propose to combine triadic patent families and technology life cycle to define the grey-rhino model. Firstly, we design the indicator rhinoindex Rh = ST/SP and descriptor sequence {Rh}, where ST and SP are the accumulative number of triadic patent families and all patent families respectively for a specific technology.Secondly, according to the two typical features of the grey-rhino event, a grey-rhino is defined as a technology that meets both qualitative and quantitative conditions. Qualitatively, this technology has a profound influence. Quantitatively, in the emerging stage, Rh ≥ Rae, where Rae is the average level of the proportion of triadic patent families. Finally, this model is verified in three datasets, namely Encyclopedia Britannica’s list for the greatest inventions(EB technologies for short), MIT breakthrough technologies(MIT technologies) and Derwent Manual Code technologies(MAN technologies).Findings: The result shows that there are 64.71% EB technologies and 50.00% MIT technologies meeting the quantitative standard of the grey-rhino model, but only 14.71%MAN technologies fit the quantitative standard. This falling trend indicates the quantitative standard of the grey-rhino model is reasonable. EB technologies and MIT technologies have profound influence on society, which means they satisfy the qualitative standard of the greyrhino model. Hence, 64.71% EB technologies and 50.00% MIT technologies are grey-rhinos.In 14.71% MAN technologies meeting the quantitative standard, we make some qualitative judgments and deem U11-A01A, U12-A01A1A, and W01-A01A as grey-rhino technologies.In addition, grey-rhinos and non-grey-rhinos have some differences. Rh values of grey-rhinos have a downward trend, while Rh values of non-grey-rhinos have a contrary trend. Rh values of grey-rhinos are scattered relatively in the early stage and centralize gradually, but nongrey-rhinos do not have this feature.Research limitations: There are four main limitations. First, if a technology satisfies the quantitative standard of the model, it is likely to be a grey-rhino but expert judgments are necessary. Second, we don’t know why it will be eminent, which involves technical contents.Thirdly, we did not consider the China National Intellectual Property Administration(CNIPA)and the German Patent and Trademark Office(DPMA) which also play important roles in worldwide patents, so we hope to expand our study to the CNIPA and the DPMA. Furthermore,we did not compare the rhino-index with other patent indicators.Practical implications: If a technology meets the quantitative standard, this can be seen as early warning signals and the technology may become a grey-rhino in the future, which can catch people’s attention in the emerging stage and make people seize the technical opportunity early.Originality/value: We define and verify a new pattern called the grey-rhino model in eminent technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 71
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying grey-rhino in eminent technologies via patent analysis
    Wei, Shelia X.
    Zhang, Helena H.
    Wang, Howell Y.
    Ye, Fred Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DATA AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2023, : 47 - 71
  • [2] Identifying grey-rhino in eminent technologies via patent analysis
    Shelia XWei
    Helena HZhang
    Howell YWang
    Fred YYe
    [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2023, 8 (01) : 47 - 71
  • [3] On a Patent Analysis Method for Identifying Core Technologies
    Kim, Chulhyun
    Seol, Hyeonju
    [J]. INTELLIGENT DECISION TECHNOLOGIES (IDT'2012), VOL 2, 2012, 16 : 441 - 448
  • [4] Identifying and monitoring emerging blockchain technologies using patent analysis
    Tseng, Fang-Mei
    Liu, Jiaying
    Gil, Eunice Ina N. Palma
    Lu, Louis Y. Y.
    [J]. WORLD PATENT INFORMATION, 2023, 75
  • [5] On a patent analysis method for identifying the core technologies of metro in china
    Long, Mei
    Ma, Tieju
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIVIL ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION 2015, 2016, 30 : 1701 - 1707
  • [6] Analysis of Patent Trends on the CCUS Technologies
    Kim, Jung-min
    Kim, Seong-Yong
    Bae, Junhee
    Shinn, Young-Jae
    Ahn, Eunyoung
    Lee, Jae-Wook
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2020, 53 (04): : 491 - 504
  • [7] Hypericum species: An analysis on the patent technologies
    Meirelles, Gabriela de Carvalho
    Bridi, Henrique
    von Poser, Gilsane Lino
    Nemitz, Marina Cardoso
    [J]. FITOTERAPIA, 2019, 139
  • [8] Patent Analysis on Geophysical Prospecting Technologies
    Lee, Jae-Wook
    Cho, Seong-Jun
    Son, Jeong-Sul
    Kim, Chang-Ryol
    Park, Sam-Gyu
    Kim, Jung-Ho
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2008, 41 (05): : 635 - 644
  • [9] Patent Network Analysis for Identifying Technological Evolution: A Case Study of China's Artificial Intelligence Technologies
    Huang, Lu
    Miao, Wen
    Zhang, Yi
    Yu, Huizhu
    Wang, Kangrui
    [J]. 2017 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (PICMET), 2017,
  • [10] Identifying Emerging Technologies with Smart Patent Indicators: The Example of Smart Houses
    Guderian, Carsten C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2019, 16 (02)